• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects of cryolipolysis on lower abdomen fat thickness of healthy women and patient satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial.冷冻溶脂对健康女性和患者满意度的下腹部脂肪厚度的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2020 Sep-Oct;24(5):441-448. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
2
Assessment of the Efficacy of Cryolipolysis on Abdominal Fat Deposits: A Prospective Study.评估冷冻溶脂术对腹部脂肪沉积的疗效:一项前瞻性研究。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Dec;47(6):2679-2686. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03369-0. Epub 2023 May 3.
3
The efficacy of cryolipolysis treatment on arms and inner thighs.冷冻溶脂治疗手臂和大腿内侧的疗效。
Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Nov;30(8):2165-9. doi: 10.1007/s10103-015-1781-y. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
4
Non-invasive cryolipolysis to reduce subcutaneous fat in the arms.非侵入性冷冻溶脂术减少手臂皮下脂肪。
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2016 Jun;18(3):126-9. doi: 10.3109/14764172.2015.1114644. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
5
Effects of cryolipolysis on abdominal adiposity of women.冷冻溶脂术对女性腹部肥胖的影响。
Cryo Letters. 2017 Sep/Oct;38(5):379-386.
6
A randomized double-blind trial evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of topical body treatment with TriHex Technology combined with abdomen cryolipolysis or radiofrequency procedures.一项评估采用TriHex技术联合腹部冷冻溶脂或射频治疗进行局部身体治疗的疗效和耐受性的随机双盲试验。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Mar;19(3):677-681. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13294. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
7
Cryolipolysis for Noninvasive Contouring of the Periumbilical Abdomen With a Nonvacuum Conformable-Surface Applicator.非真空贴合式表面敷贴器行冷冻溶脂术非侵入性重塑脐周腹部。
Dermatol Surg. 2019 Sep;45(9):1185-1190. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001802.
8
Active Heating following Cryolipolysis Reduces Efficacy and Side Effects: A Randomized Split-Body Trial.冷冻溶脂后主动加热会降低疗效并增加副作用:一项随机分组自身对照试验。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Nov 1;152(5):965-975. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010366. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
9
Cryolipolysis conformable-surface applicator for nonsurgical fat reduction in lateral thighs.用于外侧大腿非手术减脂的冷冻溶脂贴合表面涂抹器。
Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Jan;35(1):66-71. doi: 10.1093/asj/sju024.
10
Safety and efficacy of cryolipolysis for non-invasive reduction of submental fat.冷冻溶脂术用于无创减少颏下脂肪的安全性和有效性。
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Jan;48(1):3-13. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22440. Epub 2015 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Therapeutic Ultrasound and Aussie Current With High-Intensity Interval Training on Abdominal Adiposity in Young Adults With Overweight and Obesity: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.治疗性超声和澳大利亚电流联合高强度间歇训练对超重和肥胖青年成年人腹部肥胖的影响:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jul 11;14:e71829. doi: 10.2196/71829.
2
The Clinical Impact of Different Cryolipolysis Protocols: An Integrative Review.不同冷冻溶脂方案的临床影响:一项综合综述。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 May 2. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-04864-2.
3
Cryolipolysis and associated health outcomes, adverse events, and satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.冷冻溶脂术及相关健康结局、不良事件和满意度:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Obes Rev. 2025 Aug;26(8):e13925. doi: 10.1111/obr.13925. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
4
Invited Discussion on: Assessment of the Efficacy of Cryolipolysis on Abdominal Fat Deposits: A Prospective Study.特邀讨论:冷冻溶脂术对腹部脂肪沉积效果的评估:一项前瞻性研究
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Dec;47(6):2687-2689. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03424-w. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
5
Assessment of the Efficacy of Cryolipolysis on Abdominal Fat Deposits: A Prospective Study.评估冷冻溶脂术对腹部脂肪沉积的疗效:一项前瞻性研究。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Dec;47(6):2679-2686. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03369-0. Epub 2023 May 3.
6
Cryolipolysis on More than One Body Area Increases Lipid Peroxidation without Changing Lipid Profile and Inflammatory Markers.对多个身体部位进行冷冻溶脂会增加脂质过氧化,而不改变血脂水平和炎症标志物。
Biology (Basel). 2022 Nov 23;11(12):1690. doi: 10.3390/biology11121690.

本文引用的文献

1
Noninvasive submental fat reduction using colder cryolipolysis.使用更低温的冷冻溶脂术进行无创颏下脂肪减少。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017 Dec;16(4):460-465. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12383. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
2
Cryolipolysis for Nonsurgical Reduction of Fat in the Lateral Chest Wall Post-Mastectomy.冷冻溶脂术用于非手术减少乳房切除术后胸壁外侧的脂肪。
Aesthet Surg J. 2017 Jun 1;37(6):715-722. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw250.
3
Prototype CoolCup cryolipolysis applicator with over 40% reduced treatment time demonstrates equivalent safety and efficacy with greater patient preference.CoolCup冷冻溶脂治疗器原型,治疗时间缩短40%以上,安全性和疗效相当,患者更青睐。
Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Jan;49(1):63-68. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22550. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
4
Cryolipolysis versus laser lipolysis on adolescent abdominal adiposity.冷冻溶脂术与激光溶脂术治疗青少年腹部肥胖的比较
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Apr;48(4):365-70. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22475. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
5
The need to redefine age- and gender-specific overweight and obese body mass index cutoff points.重新定义特定年龄和性别的超重及肥胖体重指数切点的必要性。
Nutr Diabetes. 2015 Nov 30;5(11):e186. doi: 10.1038/nutd.2015.36.
6
Ultrasound cavitation versus cryolipolysis for non-invasive body contouring.超声空化与冷冻溶脂用于非侵入性身体塑形
Australas J Dermatol. 2016 Nov;57(4):288-293. doi: 10.1111/ajd.12386. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
7
The Safety and Efficacy of Cryolipolysis: A Systematic Review of Available Literature.冷冻溶脂术的安全性与有效性:现有文献的系统评价
Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Sep;35(7):830-6. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv039. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
8
Cryolipolysis for fat reduction and body contouring: safety and efficacy of current treatment paradigms.冷冻溶脂用于减脂和身体塑形:当前治疗模式的安全性和有效性
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):1581-1590. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001236.
9
Non-invasive subcutaneous fat reduction: a review.非侵入性皮下脂肪减少:综述。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Sep;29(9):1679-88. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12994. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
10
Cryolipolysis conformable-surface applicator for nonsurgical fat reduction in lateral thighs.用于外侧大腿非手术减脂的冷冻溶脂贴合表面涂抹器。
Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Jan;35(1):66-71. doi: 10.1093/asj/sju024.

冷冻溶脂对健康女性和患者满意度的下腹部脂肪厚度的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Effects of cryolipolysis on lower abdomen fat thickness of healthy women and patient satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Sáude de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Department of Basic Health Sciences, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Sáude de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Phys Ther. 2020 Sep-Oct;24(5):441-448. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.bjpt.2019.07.005
PMID:31375459
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7563801/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effects of cryolipolysis on the fat thickness of the lower abdomen of healthy women and patient's satisfaction.

METHODS

Design and setting: a randomized controlled trial, with concealed allocation and blinded assessor.

PARTICIPANTS

34 healthy women between 18 and 48 years, skinfold in the lower abdomen ≥3cm, BMI between 18.5 and 27kg/m, low level of physical activity, and no contraindication to cryolipolysis were allocated to intervention group (IG, n=17) or control group (CG, n=17).

INTERVENTIONS

The IG received one session of cryolipolysis with -10°C of temperature for 50min. The CG was not submitted to any kind of intervention. Both groups did the evaluation protocols at baseline, 30, 60 and 90 days after the intervention.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

fat thickness was measured by ultrasonography (US), skinfold (SF) and abdominal circumference (AC1 and AC2).

RESULTS

No significant differences between the IG and CG were demonstrated at any evaluation at any time of follow up for the variables US (30 days: 0.05cm (95%CI: -0.12; 0.22), 60 days: 0.05cm (95%CI: -0.11; 0.20) and 90 days: 0.04cm (95%CI: -0.7; 0.25)), SF (30 days: -0.09cm (95%CI: -0.25; 0.08), 60 days: -0.14cm (95%CI: -0.36; 0.09) and 90 days: -0.001cm (95%CI: -0.237; 0.234)), AC1 (30 days: 0.42cm (95%CI: -1.1; 1.9), 60 days: -0.1cm (95%CI: -1.74; 1.54) and 90 days: -0.007cm (-1.9; 1.9)) and AC2 (30 days: 0.183cm (95%CI: -0.84; 1.20), 60 days: -0.13cm (95%CI: -1.61; 1.35) and 90 days: -0.31cm (95%CI: -1.61; 1.00)).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study showed that a single application of the utilized protocol of cryolipolysis does not produce any significant effect on fat thickness of the lower abdomen of healthy women.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03160976 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03160976). Contribution of the Paper: the study is one of the first studies in the literature with methodological rigor to report an unfavorable result for localized abdominal fat treatment with a single session of cryolipolysis.

摘要

目的

分析冷冻溶脂对健康女性下腹脂肪厚度的影响及患者满意度。

方法

设计和设置:一项随机对照试验,采用隐藏分组和盲法评估。

参与者

34 名 18 至 48 岁的健康女性,下腹皮褶厚度≥3cm,BMI 为 18.5 至 27kg/m,低水平体力活动,无冷冻溶脂禁忌证,被分为干预组(IG,n=17)或对照组(CG,n=17)。

干预措施

IG 接受一次 -10°C 的冷冻溶脂治疗,持续 50min。CG 未接受任何干预。两组均在干预前、30、60 和 90 天进行评估方案。

主要观察指标

脂肪厚度通过超声(US)、皮褶(SF)和腹围(AC1 和 AC2)测量。

结果

在任何随访时间点,IG 和 CG 在 US(30 天:0.05cm(95%CI:-0.12;0.22)、60 天:0.05cm(95%CI:-0.11;0.20)和 90 天:0.04cm(95%CI:-0.7;0.25))、SF(30 天:-0.09cm(95%CI:-0.25;0.08)、60 天:-0.14cm(95%CI:-0.36;0.09)和 90 天:-0.001cm(95%CI:-0.237;0.234))、AC1(30 天:0.42cm(95%CI:-1.1;1.9)、60 天:-0.1cm(95%CI:-1.74;1.54)和 90 天:-0.007cm(-1.9;1.9))和 AC2(30 天:0.183cm(95%CI:-0.84;1.20)、60 天:-0.13cm(95%CI:-1.61;1.35)和 90 天:-0.31cm(95%CI:-1.61;1.00))方面均无显著差异。

结论

本研究表明,单次应用所使用的冷冻溶脂方案对健康女性下腹脂肪厚度没有显著影响。

临床试验注册号

NCT03160976(https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03160976)。

本文贡献

该研究是文献中首批采用严格方法报告单次冷冻溶脂治疗局部腹部脂肪不利结果的研究之一。