Laboratory for Cellular and Molecular Thyroid Research, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
J Nucl Med. 2020 Feb;61(2):177-182. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.227652. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
V600E and promoter mutations, particularly their genetic duet, are well known to be associated with poor clinical outcomes of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). Loss of radioactive iodine (RAI) avidity in recurrent PTC is a major cause of treatment failure and hence poor clinical outcomes. This study investigated the role of mutation patterns in loss of RAI avidity in recurrent PTC. This was a retrospective study of the relationship between loss of RAI avidity in structural recurrent PTC and the genotype patterns of V600E and promoter mutations in 164 patients (104 women and 60 men) with a median age of 50 y (interquartile range, 35-62 y). The overall prevalence of RAI avidity loss in recurrent PTC was 62.8% (103/164). When the cohort was divided into mutation and wild-type groups, the RAI avidity loss was 80.4% versus 33.9% ( < 0.001) in V600E versus wild-type patients, with an adjusted odds ratio of 7.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.24-16.27), and 89.4% versus 52.1% ( < 0.001) in mutation versus wild-type patients, with an adjusted odds ratio of 6.89 (95% CI, 2.28-25.66). When the cohort was divided into 4 genotypes, the RAI avidity loss was 70.3% (45/64), 55.6% (5/9), and 97.4% (37/38) in patients with V600E alone, mutation alone, and the genetic duet of coexisting and mutations, versus 30.2% (16/53) in patients with neither mutation ( < 0.001, = 0.251, and < 0.001, respectively). These corresponded to odds ratios of 5.39 (95% CI, 2.31-13.13), 2.84 (95% CI, 0.53-16.32), and 81.04 (95% CI, 11.67-3559.83), respectively. The synergy index was 13.28 (95% CI, 1.54-114.46; = 0.019) between V600E and mutation in cooperatively affecting RAI avidity. A similar genotype-associated expression pattern was observed for thyroid iodide-handling genes. V600E alone and, particularly, coexisting V600E and promoter mutations are strongly associated with loss of RAI avidity and impairment of the iodide-metabolizing machinery in recurrent PTC, showing a robust predictive value for failure of RAI treatment of PTC.
V600E 和启动子突变,尤其是它们的遗传双重突变,与甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)的不良临床结局密切相关。PTC 复发时失去放射性碘(RAI)摄取能力是治疗失败和临床结局不佳的主要原因。本研究探讨了突变模式在 PTC 复发时 RAI 摄取能力丧失中的作用。这是一项关于 164 例(104 例女性和 60 例男性)结构复发 PTC 中 RAI 摄取能力丧失与 V600E 和启动子突变基因型模式之间关系的回顾性研究,中位年龄为 50 岁(四分位距,35-62 岁)。复发 PTC 中 RAI 摄取能力丧失的总体患病率为 62.8%(103/164)。当将队列分为突变型和野生型组时,V600E 突变型患者的 RAI 摄取能力丧失率为 80.4%,而野生型患者为 33.9%(<0.001),调整后的优势比为 7.11(95%可信区间[CI],3.24-16.27),突变型患者为 89.4%,野生型患者为 52.1%(<0.001),调整后的优势比为 6.89(95%CI,2.28-25.66)。当将队列分为 4 种基因型时,V600E 单独、突变单独和共存的突变双重突变的患者中 RAI 摄取能力丧失率分别为 70.3%(45/64)、55.6%(5/9)和 97.4%(37/38),而既无突变也无突变的患者中 RAI 摄取能力丧失率为 30.2%(16/53)(<0.001,=0.251,<0.001)。这相应的优势比分别为 5.39(95%CI,2.31-13.13)、2.84(95%CI,0.53-16.32)和 81.04(95%CI,11.67-3559.83)。V600E 和突变之间的协同指数为 13.28(95%CI,1.54-114.46;=0.019),共同影响 RAI 摄取能力。在甲状腺碘处理基因中观察到类似的与基因型相关的表达模式。V600E 单独存在,特别是共存的 V600E 和启动子突变与 RAI 摄取能力丧失和 PTC 碘代谢机制受损密切相关,对 PTC 的 RAI 治疗失败具有较强的预测价值。