Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daejeon St.Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Dec;27(12):3989-3996. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05641-w. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
To evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of medial row anchor insertion between 90° or 45° (deadman) angle in the suture-bridge rotator cuff repair of medium-to-large rotator cuff tears.
This retrospective analysis included 113 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic suture-bridge repair for medium-to-large rotator cuff tears (mean tear size: 2.8 × 2.3 cm) between 2010 and 2013. The patients were divided into two groups: group I (53 patients) and group II (60 patients) involving 90° and 45° medial row anchors, respectively. The conventional lateral row anchors were inserted in the suture-bridge repair. The clinical outcomes at 2 years and radiological outcomes including re-tear or footprint coverage (anteroposterior length and mediolateral width) of the repaired tendon using postoperative MRI were evaluated.
Clinical outcome scores were significantly improved in both groups. However, Group I (90° anchor insertion group) showed better clinical scores without the difference of range of motion. The postoperative MRI revealed enlarged footprint coverage with 90° medial row anchor. The repaired footprint cuff size (mediolateral width) in the coronal plane MRI showed a statistically significant difference (45°: 19 mm vs. 90°: 24 mm) (p < 0.05).
Enhanced clinical outcomes and additional anatomical footprint coverage (coronal width of repaired tendon) in the suture-bridge repair are obtained with the 90° medial row anchors compared with the 45° medial row anchors. These findings would guide clinical application of 90° medial row anchor insertion for further medialization in the medium-to-large rotator cuff tears.
Level III (retrospective comparative trial).
评估在中等至大型肩袖撕裂的缝合桥修复中,以 90°或 45°(死锁)角插入内侧排锚钉的临床和影像学结果。
本回顾性分析纳入 2010 年至 2013 年间接受关节镜下缝合桥修复的 113 例连续中等至大型肩袖撕裂患者(平均撕裂大小:2.8×2.3cm)。患者分为两组:I 组(53 例)和 II 组(60 例),分别涉及 90°和 45°的内侧排锚钉。常规外侧排锚钉被插入缝合桥修复中。使用术后 MRI 评估 2 年时的临床结果和包括再撕裂或修复肌腱的足迹覆盖(前后长度和内外宽度)的影像学结果。
两组的临床结果评分均显著改善。然而,I 组(90°锚钉插入组)的临床评分更好,而运动范围没有差异。术后 MRI 显示使用 90°内侧排锚钉后足迹覆盖增大。冠状面 MRI 显示修复的足迹肩袖大小(内外宽度)存在统计学差异(45°:19mm 比 90°:24mm)(p<0.05)。
与 45°内侧排锚钉相比,90°内侧排锚钉在缝合桥修复中可获得更好的临床效果和额外的解剖足迹覆盖(修复肌腱的冠状宽度)。这些发现将指导 90°内侧排锚钉插入在中等至大型肩袖撕裂中进一步内侧化的临床应用。
III 级(回顾性比较试验)。