Laboratory of Retinal Neurochemistry and Experimental Ophthalmology, Department of Human Biochemistry, School of Medicine/CEFyBO, University of Buenos Aires/CONICET, Paraguay 2155, 5°P, (1121),, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mol Neurobiol. 2020 Jan;57(1):435-449. doi: 10.1007/s12035-019-01715-5. Epub 2019 Aug 3.
Enriched environment (EE) protects the retina from adult rats against ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury; however, how the components of EE contribute to the recovery after retinal ischemic damage remains unclear. We analyzed the contribution of social, cognitive, and visual stimulation on functional and histological alterations induced by I/R. Male Wistar rats were submitted to unilateral ischemia by increasing intraocular pressure to 120 mmHg for 40 min. After ischemia, animals were housed in the following conditions: standard environment (SE), enriched environment (EE), novelty environment (NE), standard social environment (SoE), standard visual environment (SVE), or visual environment (VE). In another set of experiments, rats were submitted to bilateral ischemia and housed in SE or EE. At 2 weeks post-ischemia, rats were subjected to electroretinography and histological analysis. EE (but not SoE or NE) afforded functional and histological protection against unilateral ischemia. EE did not induce protection in animals submitted to bilateral ischemia. VE protected retinal function and histology and increased retinal BDNF levels, while a TrkB receptor antagonist prevented the protective effect of VE against I/R damage. In animals submitted to unilateral ischemia, EE and VE induced an increase in c-fos immunoreactivity in the ipsi and contralateral superior colliculus, whereas in animals submitted to bilateral ischemia, no changes in c-fos-immunoreactivity were observed in either superior colliculus from EE-housed animals. These results support that visual stimulation could be a potent stimulus for driving retinal protection in adult rats through a BDNF/TrkB-dependent mechanism, likely involving the superior colliculus.
丰富环境(EE)可保护成年大鼠的视网膜免受缺血/再灌注(I/R)损伤;然而,EE 的组成部分如何有助于视网膜缺血性损伤后的恢复尚不清楚。我们分析了社会、认知和视觉刺激对 I/R 引起的功能和组织学改变的贡献。雄性 Wistar 大鼠通过将眼内压升高至 120 mmHg 持续 40 min 来实现单侧缺血。缺血后,动物被安置在以下环境中:标准环境(SE)、丰富环境(EE)、新奇环境(NE)、标准社交环境(SoE)、标准视觉环境(SVE)或视觉环境(VE)。在另一组实验中,大鼠接受双侧缺血并被安置在 SE 或 EE 中。在缺血后 2 周,对大鼠进行视网膜电图和组织学分析。EE(但不是 SoE 或 NE)对单侧缺血提供了功能和组织学保护。EE 并未诱导双侧缺血动物的保护作用。VE 保护视网膜功能和组织学,并增加视网膜 BDNF 水平,而 TrkB 受体拮抗剂可阻止 VE 对 I/R 损伤的保护作用。在接受单侧缺血的动物中,EE 和 VE 诱导同侧和对侧上丘中 c-fos 免疫反应性增加,而在接受双侧缺血的动物中,EE 饲养的动物的上丘中未观察到 c-fos 免疫反应性的变化。这些结果支持视觉刺激可能是通过 BDNF/TrkB 依赖机制驱动成年大鼠视网膜保护的有效刺激,可能涉及上丘。