Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Jan;39(1):127-134. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04713-z. Epub 2019 Aug 3.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common type of inflammatory arthritis leading to joint damage and physical disability. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are considered a common comorbidity in patients with RA. However, the mechanism underlying its pathogenesis is not definitively explained. Endothelial dysfunction caused by impaired nitric oxide synthesis is an early indicator of cardiovascular disease. Asymmetric and symmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA and SDMA, respectively) the inhibitors of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS) have emerged as novel CVD risk factor determiners. Concerning the unmet need to identify a salutary biomarker for CVD prediction, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the serum/plasma ADMA and SDMA levels in RA patients compared with the healthy controls. A thorough literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify all studies reporting ADMA and/or SDMA levels in RA patients compared with healthy controls. The quality of studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Pooled standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as the effect size in this study. We also conducted stratified analysis based on assay methods and median age of the participants. Fourteen articles were included. The pooled serum/plasma levels of ADMA were higher in RA patients compared with those of healthy controls (SMD = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.49 to 1.55); However, no statistical differences between RA patients and healthy controls in serum/plasma SDMA levels was seen (SMD = 0.57, 95% CI = -0.21 to 1.36). Subgroup analyses suggested that participants aged > 50 years had higher levels of ADMA rather than controls and the measurement method was a source of heterogeneity for ADMA. According to the results of this meta-analysis, ADMA measurement but not SDMA, can be useful for assessment of endothelial dysfunction as a predictor of CVD risk in RA patients. Prospero registration number: CRD42019121126.
类风湿关节炎(RA)是导致关节损伤和身体残疾的最常见炎症性关节炎类型。心血管疾病(CVD)被认为是 RA 患者的常见合并症。然而,其发病机制尚不完全清楚。一氧化氮合酶合成受损导致的内皮功能障碍是心血管疾病的早期指标。非对称和对称二甲基精氨酸(ADMA 和 SDMA)是内皮一氧化氮合酶(NOS)的抑制剂,已成为新的 CVD 风险因素决定因素。鉴于需要确定用于 CVD 预测的有益生物标志物,本荟萃分析的目的是评估 RA 患者与健康对照组之间的血清/血浆 ADMA 和 SDMA 水平。在 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar 中进行了全面的文献检索,以确定所有报告 RA 患者与健康对照组之间 ADMA 和/或 SDMA 水平的研究。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估研究质量。本研究使用标准均数差(SMD)和 95%置信区间(CI)作为效应量。我们还根据测定方法和参与者的中位年龄进行了分层分析。共纳入 14 篇文章。与健康对照组相比,RA 患者的血清/血浆 ADMA 水平更高(SMD=1.02,95%CI=0.49 至 1.55);然而,RA 患者与健康对照组的血清/血浆 SDMA 水平无统计学差异(SMD=0.57,95%CI=-0.21 至 1.36)。亚组分析表明,年龄>50 岁的参与者 ADMA 水平高于对照组,且测量方法是 ADMA 异质性的来源。根据本荟萃分析的结果,ADMA 测量而不是 SDMA 测量可用于评估内皮功能障碍,作为 RA 患者 CVD 风险的预测指标。前瞻性注册号:CRD42019121126。