Suppr超能文献

体重指数、腹部肥胖、体重增加与尿失禁风险:前瞻性研究的系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。

Body mass index, abdominal fatness, weight gain and the risk of urinary incontinence: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Department of Nutrition, Bjørknes University College, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BJOG. 2019 Nov;126(12):1424-1433. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15897.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adiposity has been associated with elevated risk of urinary incontinence in epidemiological studies; however, the strength of the association has differed between studies.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic literature review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies on adiposity and risk of urinary incontinence.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched PubMed and Embase databases up to 19 July 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Prospective cohort studies were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked for accuracy by a second reviewer. Summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random effects models.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-four prospective studies were included. The summary RR per 5 kg/m increment in body mass index (BMI) was 1.20 (95% CI 1.16-1.25, I  = 62%, n = 11) for population-based studies and 1.19 (95% CI 1.08-1.30, I = 87.1%, n = 8) for pregnancy-based studies, 1.18 (95% CI 1.14-1.22, I = 0%, n = 2) per 10 cm increase in waist circumference and 1.34 (95% CI 1.11-1.62, I = 90%, n = 2) per 10 kg of weight gain. Although the test for nonlinearity was significant for BMI, P = 0.04, the association was approximately linear. For subtypes of urinary incontinence the summary RR per 5 BMI units was 1.45 (95% CI 1.25-1.68, I = 85%, n = 3) for frequent incontinence, 1.52 (95% CI 1.37-1.68, I = 34%, n = 4) for severe incontinence, 1.33 (95% CI 1.26-1.41, I  = 0%, n = 8) for stress incontinence, 1.26 (95% CI 1.14-1.40, I  = 70%, n = 7) for urge incontinence, and 1.52 (95% CI 1.36-1.69, I = 0%, n = 3) for mixed incontinence.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest excess weight may increase risk of urinary incontinence.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Overweight and obesity increase the risk of urinary incontinence.

摘要

背景

流行病学研究表明肥胖与尿失禁风险升高相关;然而,不同研究之间的关联强度有所不同。

目的

对前瞻性研究中肥胖与尿失禁风险的关系进行系统文献回顾和剂量-反应荟萃分析。

检索策略

我们检索了截至 2017 年 7 月 19 日的 PubMed 和 Embase 数据库。

选择标准

包括前瞻性队列研究。

数据收集和分析

由一名审查员提取数据,另一名审查员检查准确性。使用随机效应模型计算汇总相对风险 (RR) 和 95%置信区间 (CI)。

主要结果

纳入了 24 项前瞻性研究。体重指数 (BMI) 每增加 5kg/m2,人群研究的汇总 RR 为 1.20(95%CI 1.16-1.25,I = 62%,n = 11),妊娠研究为 1.19(95%CI 1.08-1.30,I = 87.1%,n = 8),腰围每增加 10cm 的汇总 RR 为 1.18(95%CI 1.14-1.22,I = 0%,n = 2),体重增加 10kg 的 RR 为 1.34(95%CI 1.11-1.62,I = 90%,n = 2)。尽管 BMI 的非线性检验具有统计学意义(P = 0.04),但这种关联近似线性。对于尿失禁的亚型,每增加 5 个 BMI 单位的汇总 RR 为频繁性尿失禁 1.45(95%CI 1.25-1.68,I = 85%,n = 3),重度尿失禁 1.52(95%CI 1.37-1.68,I = 34%,n = 4),压力性尿失禁 1.33(95%CI 1.26-1.41,I = 0%,n = 8),急迫性尿失禁 1.26(95%CI 1.14-1.40,I = 70%,n = 7),混合性尿失禁 1.52(95%CI 1.36-1.69,I = 0%,n = 3)。

结论

这些结果表明超重和肥胖可能会增加尿失禁的风险。

推文摘要

超重和肥胖会增加尿失禁的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验