Suppr超能文献

八旬老人的非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术经验:75至80岁患者与≥80岁患者围手术期事件及长期生存率的比较

OPCAB experience in octogenarians: A comparison of perioperative events and long-term survival between patients aged 75 to 80 years and patients aged ≥80 years.

作者信息

Zhang Guodong, Gao Qing, Chen Shenglong, Chen Yu

机构信息

Cardiac Surgery Department, Peking University People's Hospital, Bejing, China.

出版信息

J Card Surg. 2019 Oct;34(10):948-956. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14154. Epub 2019 Aug 2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The advantages of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) in octogenarians are still undetermined.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected the data of 338 patients aged ≥75 with at least two coronary-artery diseases who underwent OPCAB. Then, the two groups were divided into follow-up survival and follow-up death subgroups. The baseline and perioperative data were compared for the younger and octogenarian groups, as well as for the subgroups. Moreover, long-term survival rates in the follow-up survival and follow-up death subgroups were compared; a Cox regression model was built to explore the independent risk factors that influence long-term survival.

RESULTS

NYNA ≥ III (39.4% vs 23.2%, P = .006), AMI (45.1% vs 24.3%, P = .001), and three diseased vessels with LM disease (38.0% vs 25.8%, P = .043) were more prevalent among octogenarians. Octogenarians required more intraoperative (11.3% vs 0.40%, P = .000) and postoperative (9.9% vs 2.2%, P = .003) IABP insertions and more ventilation time (P = .053), and they spent a longer time in the ICU (174.1 ± 34.9 vs 81.0 ± 6.4 hours, P = .010), had a longer total hospital stay (32.7 ± 3.1 vs 24.6 ± 0.8 days, P = .015), and had a longer postoperative hospital stay (20.5 ± 2.5 vs 14.5 ± 0.7 days, P = .021); however, fewer LIMA grafts were used among octogenarians (71.8% vs 90.3%, P = .000). The mortality and the postoperative complications between the two groups were similar. Long-term survival at 1, 5, and 10 years were satisfactory at 98.4 vs 91.5%, 89.7 vs 82.8%, and 61.1 vs 52.1% for the younger group and the octogenarians, respectively (P = .440). The Cox regression analysis results suggest that malignant ventricular arrhythmias (HR 4.058, CI, 1.760-9.358, P = .001; HR 7.256, CI, 2.112-24.932, P = .001) and reintubation (HR 3.593, CI, 1.646-7.845, P = .001; HR 4.252, CI, 1.797-10.060, P = .001) were independent risk factors that affect the long-term survival in both overall OPCAB patients and in the younger patient group.

CONCLUSIONS

OPCAB can be safely performed, with acceptable operative mortality and complication rates and satisfactory survival outcomes. The Cox regression analysis results demonstrated that malignant ventricular arrhythmia and reintubation were independent risk factors that affect long-term survival in both overall OPCAB patients and in the younger group of patients.

摘要

引言

非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)在八旬老人中的优势仍未确定。

方法

我们回顾性收集了338例年龄≥75岁、患有至少两种冠状动脉疾病且接受OPCAB的患者的数据。然后,将两组分为随访生存亚组和随访死亡亚组。比较了年轻组和八旬老人组以及各亚组的基线和围手术期数据。此外,比较了随访生存亚组和随访死亡亚组的长期生存率;建立Cox回归模型以探索影响长期生存的独立危险因素。

结果

纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级≥III级(39.4%对23.2%,P = 0.006)、急性心肌梗死(AMI,45.1%对24.3%,P = 0.001)以及三支血管病变合并左主干病变(38.0%对25.8%,P = 0.043)在八旬老人中更为普遍。八旬老人术中(11.3%对0.40%,P = 0.000)和术后(9.9%对2.2%,P = 0.003)主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)置入需求更多,通气时间更长(P = 0.053),在重症监护病房(ICU)停留时间更长(174.1±34.9小时对81.0±6.4小时,P = 0.010),总住院时间更长(32.7±3.1天对24.6±0.8天,P = 0.015),术后住院时间更长(20.5±2.5天对14.5±0.7天,P = 0.021);然而,八旬老人使用左乳内动脉(LIMA)移植物较少(71.8%对90.3%,P = 0.000)。两组之间的死亡率和术后并发症相似。年轻组和八旬老人组在1年、5年和10年的长期生存率分别为98.4%对91.5%、89.7%对82.8%和61.1%对52.1%,结果令人满意(P = 0.440)。Cox回归分析结果表明,恶性室性心律失常(HR 4.058,CI,1.760 - 9.358,P = 0.001;HR 7.256,CI,2.112 - 24.932,P = 0.001)和再次插管(HR 3.593,CI,1.646 - 7.845,P = 0.001;HR 4.252,CI,1.797 - 10.060,P = 0.001)是影响总体OPCAB患者和年轻患者组长期生存的独立危险因素。

结论

OPCAB可以安全进行,手术死亡率和并发症发生率可接受,生存结果令人满意。Cox回归分析结果表明,恶性室性心律失常和再次插管是影响总体OPCAB患者和年轻患者组长期生存的独立危险因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验