• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美敦力Freestyle在主动脉瓣感染中的应用:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配分析。

Use of the Medtronic Freestyle for aortic valve infection: A retrospective propensity score matched analysis.

作者信息

Easo Jerry, Szczechowicz Marcin, Hoelzl Philipp, Horst Michael, Eichstaedt Harald, Zhigalov Konstantin, Mashhour Ahmed, Weymann Alexander, Dapunt Otto E

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, European Medical School Oldenburg-Groningen, University Clinic Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, HELIOS Hospital Siegburg, Siegburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Card Surg. 2019 Oct;34(10):957-964. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14176. Epub 2019 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1111/jocs.14176
PMID:31376235
Abstract

BACKGROUNDS

Aortic valve and prosthetic valve endocarditis present a challenging subgroup of patients at high risk. We analyzed our experience using the Medtronic Freestyle in full root technique for the treatment of these cases over 18-year time period.

METHODS

We investigated the endocarditis subgroup from our cohort of 971 patients and compared results against other valve types with propensity score matching implementing nearest neighbor method. T-test, χ test, logistic regression, and Cox regression were performed.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients from the Freestyle group (FS) were matched against 54 patients from a cohort of 376 aortic valve/root endocarditis patients treated by other valve types (non-FS). Hospital mortality was 9/54 (16.7%) in the FS vs 13/54 (24.1%) in the non-FS group (P = .33). Variables age (P = .003) and renal impairment (P = .026) had an impact on mortality according to Cox regression analysis for early results. Variables with significant risk for long-term mortality included postoperative renal impairment (P = .0001) and multiorgan failure (P = .0001). Recurrent infection was low (1.8% for FS and 3.7% for non-FS group), and freedom from reoperation was 97.2%. Use of the Medtronic Freestyle was no significant risk factor for long-term mortality.

CONCLUSION

The Freestyle stentless xenograft is a viable alternative for treatment of valve/root and prosthetic endocarditis. In our experience, it showed good postoperative performance with low rate of reinfection while having an acceptable operative risk-profile for this high-risk cohort.

摘要

背景

主动脉瓣及人工瓣膜心内膜炎是高危患者中具有挑战性的亚组。我们分析了在18年期间使用美敦力Freestyle全根部技术治疗这些病例的经验。

方法

我们在971例患者队列中调查了心内膜炎亚组,并通过倾向评分匹配法(采用最近邻法)将结果与其他瓣膜类型进行比较。进行了t检验、χ检验、逻辑回归和Cox回归分析。

结果

Freestyle组(FS)的54例患者与376例接受其他瓣膜类型治疗的主动脉瓣/根部心内膜炎患者队列中的54例患者进行匹配(非FS)。FS组的医院死亡率为9/54(16.7%),非FS组为13/54(24.1%)(P = 0.33)。根据早期结果的Cox回归分析,变量年龄(P = 0.003)和肾功能损害(P = 0.026)对死亡率有影响。具有长期死亡显著风险的变量包括术后肾功能损害(P = 0.0001)和多器官功能衰竭(P = 0.0001)。再感染率较低(FS组为1.8%,非FS组为3.7%),再次手术的无事件生存率为97.2%。使用美敦力Freestyle不是长期死亡的显著危险因素。

结论

Freestyle无支架异种移植物是治疗瓣膜/根部及人工瓣膜心内膜炎的可行替代方案。根据我们的经验,它术后表现良好,再感染率低,同时对于这个高危队列具有可接受的手术风险概况。

相似文献

1
Use of the Medtronic Freestyle for aortic valve infection: A retrospective propensity score matched analysis.美敦力Freestyle在主动脉瓣感染中的应用:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配分析。
J Card Surg. 2019 Oct;34(10):957-964. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14176. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
2
Stentless Root Replacement versus Tissue Valves in Infective Endocarditis - A Propensity-Score Matched Study.无支架瓣环重建与组织瓣膜在感染性心内膜炎中的应用:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Aug 1;35(4):411-419. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0267.
3
Medtronic Freestyle aortic bioprosthesis: a potential option for haemodialysis patients†.美敦力自由式主动脉生物假体:血液透析患者的一个潜在选择†
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Apr;22(4):459-63; discussion 463-4. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv388. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
4
Ten-year experience with stentless aortic valves: full-root versus subcoronary implantation.无支架主动脉瓣十年经验:全根部植入与冠状动脉下植入
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Feb;85(2):445-52; discussion 452-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.10.015.
5
Long Term Outcomes of Freestyle Stentless Aortic Bioprosthesis: A Single Center Experience.自由式无支架主动脉生物假体的长期疗效:单中心经验
Heart Surg Forum. 2020 Feb 10;23(1):E034-E038. doi: 10.1532/hsf.2661.
6
Eight-year results of Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis in the aortic position: a single-center study of 500 patients.主动脉位置的Freestyle无支架生物假体八年结果:500例患者的单中心研究
J Heart Valve Dis. 2006 Mar;15(2):247-52.
7
Freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis is a suitable alternative for aortic root replacement in elderly patients: a propensity score study.经皮主动脉瓣置换术治疗老年退行性主动脉瓣狭窄伴中重度二尖瓣反流的临床效果
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Oct;94(4):1185-90. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
8
Long-term results of Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis in the aortic position: a single-center prospective cohort of 500 patients.主动脉位置的Freestyle无支架生物假体的长期结果:500例患者的单中心前瞻性队列研究
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;148(5):1903-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.063. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
9
Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.八十岁老人单纯主动脉瓣置换术采用全胸骨切开术与右前小切口开胸术的比较:一项倾向匹配研究†
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;20(6):732-41; discussion 741. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv030. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
10
Benefits and medium-term outcome of the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless aortic prosthesis in cases of acute bacterial endocarditis.索林Pericarbon Freedom无支架主动脉瓣膜假体在急性细菌性心内膜炎病例中的益处及中期结果。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Oct;23(4):593-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw176. Epub 2016 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Geometric changes in aortic root replacement using Freestyle prosthesis.使用 Freestyle 假体进行主动脉根部置换的几何变化。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jul 28;16(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01583-y.
2
Stentless Root Replacement versus Tissue Valves in Infective Endocarditis - A Propensity-Score Matched Study.无支架瓣环重建与组织瓣膜在感染性心内膜炎中的应用:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Aug 1;35(4):411-419. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0267.
3
Surgical treatment of infective endocarditis in the era of minimally invasive cardiac surgery and transcatheter approach: an editorial.
微创心脏手术和经导管治疗时代感染性心内膜炎的外科治疗:一篇社论
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Mar;12(3):140-142. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.01.59.