Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, United States of America; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, United States of America; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, United States of America; Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, United States of America; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, United States of America.
Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, United States of America; Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, United States of America.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Nov;63:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.07.017. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
Functional MRI (fMRI) signals are robustly detectable in white matter (WM) but they have been largely ignored in the fMRI literature. Their nature, interpretation, and relevance as potential indicators of brain function remain under explored and even controversial. Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) contrast has for over 25 years been exploited for detecting localized neural activity in the cortex using fMRI. While BOLD signals have been reliably detected in grey matter (GM) in a very large number of studies, such signals have rarely been reported from WM. However, it is clear from our own and other studies that although BOLD effects are weaker in WM, using appropriate detection and analysis methods they are robustly detectable both in response to stimuli and in a resting state. BOLD fluctuations in a resting state exhibit similar temporal and spectral profiles in both GM and WM, and their relative low frequency (0.01-0.1 Hz) signal powers are comparable. They also vary with baseline neural activity e.g. as induced by different levels of anesthesia, and alter in response to a stimulus. In previous work we reported that BOLD signals in WM in a resting state exhibit anisotropic temporal correlations with neighboring voxels. On the basis of these findings, we derived functional correlation tensors that quantify the correlational anisotropy in WM BOLD signals. We found that, along many WM tracts, the directional preferences of these functional correlation tensors in a resting state are grossly consistent with those revealed by diffusion tensors, and that external stimuli tend to enhance visualization of specific and relevant fiber pathways. These findings support the proposition that variations in WM BOLD signals represent tract-specific responses to neural activity. We have more recently shown that sensory stimulations induce explicit BOLD responses along parts of the projection fiber pathways, and that task-related BOLD changes in WM occur synchronously with the temporal pattern of stimuli. WM tracts also show a transient signal response following short stimuli analogous to but different from the hemodynamic response function (HRF) characteristic of GM. Thus there is converging and compelling evidence that WM exhibits both resting state fluctuations and stimulus-evoked BOLD signals very similar (albeit weaker) to those in GM. A number of studies from other laboratories have also reported reliable observations of WM activations. Detection of BOLD signals in WM has been enhanced by using specialized tasks or modified data analysis methods. In this mini-review we report summaries of some of our recent studies that provide evidence that BOLD signals in WM are related to brain functional activity and deserve greater attention by the neuroimaging community.
功能磁共振成像 (fMRI) 信号在白质 (WM) 中是可以可靠检测到的,但在 fMRI 文献中却被大量忽略。它们的性质、解释以及作为大脑功能潜在指标的相关性仍在探索之中,甚至存在争议。在过去的 25 年中,血氧水平依赖 (BOLD) 对比一直被用于通过 fMRI 检测皮质中的局部神经活动。虽然在大量研究中已经可靠地检测到 GM 中的 BOLD 信号,但很少有研究报告 WM 中的 BOLD 信号。然而,从我们自己和其他研究中可以清楚地看出,尽管 WM 中的 BOLD 效应较弱,但使用适当的检测和分析方法,无论是在刺激反应中还是在静息状态下,都可以可靠地检测到。静息状态下的 BOLD 波动在 GM 和 WM 中都具有相似的时间和频谱特征,它们的相对低频(0.01-0.1 Hz)信号功率相当。它们还随基线神经活动而变化,例如,受不同麻醉水平的影响,并随刺激而改变。在之前的工作中,我们报告了静息状态下 WM 中的 BOLD 信号与相邻体素具有各向异性的时间相关性。基于这些发现,我们推导出了量化 WM BOLD 信号相关各向异性的功能相关张量。我们发现,在许多 WM 束中,这些功能相关张量在静息状态下的方向偏好与扩散张量所揭示的大致一致,并且外部刺激往往会增强对特定和相关纤维通路的可视化。这些发现支持这样的假设,即 WM BOLD 信号的变化代表对神经活动的束特异性反应。我们最近还表明,感觉刺激会沿着投射纤维通路的一部分诱导明确的 BOLD 反应,并且 WM 中的与任务相关的 BOLD 变化与刺激的时间模式同步发生。WM 束在受到类似于但不同于 GM 中特征性的血流动力学反应函数 (HRF) 的短刺激后也会出现短暂的信号响应。因此,有越来越多的证据表明 WM 既表现出静息状态波动,也表现出与 GM 非常相似(尽管较弱)的刺激诱发 BOLD 信号。其他实验室的一些研究也报告了可靠的 WM 激活观察结果。通过使用专门的任务或修改数据分析方法,可以增强对 WM 中的 BOLD 信号的检测。在这个简短的综述中,我们报告了我们最近的一些研究的摘要,这些研究提供了证据表明 WM 中的 BOLD 信号与大脑功能活动有关,值得神经影像学界给予更多关注。