Rolon-Arroyo Benjamin, Oosterhoff Benjamin, Layne Christopher M, Steinberg Alan M, Pynoos Robert S, Kaplow Julie B
University of California, Los Angeles.
Montana State University, Bozeman.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;59(3):434-443. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
Children and adolescents who experience potentially traumatic events are at risk for developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Although psychometrically sound measures are now available to assess these youths, brief tools are currently needed for screening purposes. Two studies were conducted to develop and validate the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-5-Brief Form (RI-5-BF).
Study 1 used item response theory models to derive the RI-5-BF from the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-5 and assess its internal consistency using a sample of 486 trauma-exposed youths (mean age = 13.32 years, SD = 2.90) recruited through a practice research network. Study 2 used receiver operating characteristic analyses and diagnostic efficiency statistics to assess the discriminant-groups validity and clinical utility of the RI-5-BF in identifying children at different levels of PTSD risk using a sample of 41 treatment-seeking youths (mean age = 12.44 years, SD = 2.99).
In study 1, item response theory models identified the 11 most informative items across their respective subscales. The RI-5-BF exhibited excellent internal consistency in both studies (α > .93). In study 2, receiver operating characteristic analyses indicated that an RI-5-BF score of 21 maximized sensitivity and specificity. Moreover, diagnostic likelihood ratios across multiple levels of scores provided support for the measure's clinical utility in identifying different levels of PTSD risk.
These findings provide support for both the psychometric properties of the RI-5-BF as a brief screening measure for PTSD in children and adolescents and its utility for identifying youths meriting further assessment and consideration for treatment.
经历潜在创伤性事件的儿童和青少年有患创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的风险。尽管现在有心理测量学上可靠的方法来评估这些青少年,但目前仍需要简短的工具用于筛查目的。进行了两项研究来开发和验证《DSM-5简版加州大学洛杉矶分校PTSD反应指数》(RI-5-BF)。
研究1使用项目反应理论模型从《DSM-5加州大学洛杉矶分校PTSD反应指数》中推导RI-5-BF,并使用通过实践研究网络招募的486名遭受创伤的青少年样本(平均年龄 = 13.32岁,标准差 = 2.90)评估其内部一致性。研究2使用受试者工作特征分析和诊断效率统计,以41名寻求治疗的青少年样本(平均年龄 = 12.44岁,标准差 = 2.99)评估RI-5-BF在识别不同PTSD风险水平儿童方面的判别组效度和临床效用。
在研究1中,项目反应理论模型在各自的子量表中确定了11个信息量最大的项目。RI-5-BF在两项研究中均表现出出色的内部一致性(α >.93)。在研究2中,受试者工作特征分析表明,RI-5-BF得分为21时灵敏度和特异性最高。此外,多个分数水平的诊断似然比为该测量方法在识别不同PTSD风险水平方面的临床效用提供了支持。
这些发现为RI-5-BF作为儿童和青少年PTSD简短筛查测量方法的心理测量特性及其在识别值得进一步评估和考虑治疗的青少年方面的效用提供了支持。