• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于离散选择实验的方案:了解患者在管理慢性非癌症疼痛方面对药物的偏好。

A protocol for a discrete choice experiment: understanding patient medicine preferences for managing chronic non-cancer pain.

机构信息

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 2;9(8):e027153. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027153.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027153
PMID:31377695
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6687015/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

High rates of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP), concerns about adverse effects including dependence among those prescribed potent pain medicines, the recent evidence supporting active rather than passive management strategies and a lack of funding for holistic programme have resulted in challenges around decision making for treatment among clinicians and their patients. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are one way of assessing and valuing treatment preferences. Here, we outline a protocol for a study that assesses patient preferences for CNCP treatment.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A final list of attributes (and their levels) for the DCE was generated using a detailed iterative process. This included a literature review, a focus group and individual interviews with those with CNCP and clinicians who treat people with CNCP. From this process a list of attributes was obtained. Following a review by study investigators including pain and addiction specialists, pharmacists and epidemiologists, the final list of attributes was selected (number of medications, risk of addiction, side effects, pain interference, activity goals, source of information on pain, provider of pain care and out-of-pocket costs). Specialised software was used to construct an experimental design for the survey. The survey will be administered to two groups of participants, those from a longitudinal cohort of patients receiving opioids for CNCP and a convenience sample of patients recruited through Australia's leading pain advocacy body (Painaustralia) and their social media and website. The data from the two participant groups will be initially analysed separately, as their demographic and clinical characteristics may differ substantially (in terms of age, duration of pain and current treatment modality). Mixed logit and latent class analysis will be used to explore heterogeneity of responses.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval was obtained from the University of New South Wales Sydney Human Ethics committee HC16511 (for the focus group discussions, the one-on-one interviews and online survey) and HC16916 (for the cohort). A lay summary will be made available on the National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre website and Painaustralia's website. Peer review papers will be submitted, and it is expected the results will be presented at relevant pain management conferences nationally and internationally. These results will also be used to improve understanding of treatment goals between clinicians and those with CNCP.

摘要

简介

慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)发生率高,人们对包括依赖在内的不良影响感到担忧,近期有证据支持积极而非被动的管理策略,以及缺乏全面计划的资金,这些都导致临床医生及其患者在治疗决策方面面临挑战。离散选择实验(DCE)是评估和衡量治疗偏好的一种方法。在这里,我们概述了一项评估 CNCP 治疗患者偏好的研究方案。

方法和分析

使用详细的迭代过程生成 DCE 的最终属性(及其水平)列表。这包括文献综述、与 CNCP 患者和治疗此类患者的临床医生进行的焦点小组和个人访谈。从这个过程中获得了属性列表。经过包括疼痛和成瘾专家、药剂师和流行病学家在内的研究调查人员的审查后,选择了最终的属性列表(药物数量、成瘾风险、副作用、疼痛干扰、活动目标、疼痛信息来源、疼痛护理提供者和自付费用)。专门的软件用于构建调查的实验设计。该调查将分两个组进行,一组来自接受阿片类药物治疗 CNCP 的纵向队列患者,另一组来自通过澳大利亚领先的疼痛倡导组织(Painaustralia)及其社交媒体和网站招募的便利样本患者。这两个组的参与者的数据将单独进行初步分析,因为他们的人口统计学和临床特征可能有很大差异(在年龄、疼痛持续时间和当前治疗方式方面)。混合对数和潜在类别分析将用于探索反应的异质性。

伦理和传播

新南威尔士大学悉尼人类伦理委员会已批准该研究(用于焦点小组讨论、一对一访谈和在线调查)和 HC16916(用于队列)。国家药物和酒精研究中心网站和 Painaustralia 网站上将提供通俗易懂的摘要。将提交同行评审论文,并预计将在全国和国际相关疼痛管理会议上介绍研究结果。这些结果还将用于改善临床医生和 CNCP 患者之间对治疗目标的理解。

相似文献

1
A protocol for a discrete choice experiment: understanding patient medicine preferences for managing chronic non-cancer pain.用于离散选择实验的方案:了解患者在管理慢性非癌症疼痛方面对药物的偏好。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 2;9(8):e027153. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027153.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Prescriber decision-making on antithrombotic therapy after endovascular intervention for peripheral artery disease: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment.经皮腔内血管介入治疗外周动脉疾病后抗血栓治疗的决策者选择:一项离散选择实验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 20;14(3):e079668. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079668.
4
Chronic pain patients' treatment preferences: a discrete-choice experiment.慢性疼痛患者的治疗偏好:离散选择实验。
Eur J Health Econ. 2015 Jul;16(6):613-28. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0614-4. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
5
Assessment of the societal and individual preferences for fertility treatment in Australia: study protocol for stated preference discrete choice experiments.澳大利亚社会和个人对生育治疗的偏好评估:基于陈述偏好离散选择实验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 14;8(2):e020509. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020509.
6
Preferences of people with mild cognitive impairment for physical activity interventions in China: protocol for a discrete choice experiment study.轻度认知障碍患者对中国身体活动干预措施的偏好:一项离散选择实验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 14;12(10):e064153. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064153.
7
Preferences for ARV-based HIV prevention methods among men and women, adolescent girls and female sex workers in Gauteng Province, South Africa: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment.南非豪登省男性、女性、少女及女性性工作者对基于抗逆转录病毒药物的艾滋病毒预防方法的偏好:一项离散选择实验方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 27;6(6):e010682. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010682.
8
Public, medical professionals' and patients' preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: study protocol for discrete choice experiments.公众、医学专业人员和患者对移植供体器官分配的偏好:离散选择实验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 17;8(10):e026040. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026040.
9
Preferences for accessing sexual health services among middle-aged and older adults in the UK: a study protocol for a discrete choice experiment using mixed methods.英国中年和老年人获取性健康服务的偏好:一项使用混合方法的离散选择实验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 8;13(5):e066783. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066783.
10
Patient preferences for osteoarthritis pain and chronic low back pain treatments in the United States: a discrete-choice experiment.美国患者对骨关节炎疼痛和慢性下腰痛治疗的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2020 Sep;28(9):1202-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
What family policies do Iranian couples prefer for childbearing? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment.伊朗夫妇在生育方面倾向于哪些家庭政策?来自离散选择实验的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 28;25(1):821. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21938-7.
2
What do Iranians value most when choosing a hospital? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment.伊朗人在选择医院时最看重什么?来自离散选择实验的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 17;19(10):e0293241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293241. eCollection 2024.
3
Understanding the preferences of young women in self-sampling interventions for sexually transmitted infection diagnosis: a discrete choice experimental protocol.了解年轻女性对性传播感染诊断自我采样干预措施的偏好:一项离散选择实验方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 24;14(9):e082981. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082981.
4
Societal Preferences for Meningococcal B Vaccination in Children: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Spain.西班牙儿童对B型脑膜炎球菌疫苗接种的社会偏好:一项离散选择实验
Infect Dis Ther. 2023 Jan;12(1):157-175. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00708-7. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
5
Importance of attributes and willingness to pay for oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation in China: A discrete choice experiment.中国房颤患者对口服抗凝药物治疗的属性和支付意愿的重要性:一项离散选择实验。
PLoS Med. 2021 Aug 26;18(8):e1003730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003730. eCollection 2021 Aug.
6
Patient Preferences to Assess Value IN Gene Therapies: Protocol Development for the PAVING Study in Hemophilia.评估基因疗法价值的患者偏好:血友病PAVING研究的方案制定
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 9;8:595797. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.595797. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Discrete Choice Experiments: A Guide to Model Specification, Estimation and Software.离散选择实验:模型设定、估计与软件指南
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Jul;35(7):697-716. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0506-4.
2
CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain - United States, 2016.美国 2016 年慢性疼痛阿片类药物处方指南。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016 Mar 18;65(1):1-49. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1.
3
Health service utilisation by people living with chronic non-cancer pain: findings from the Pain and Opioids IN Treatment (POINT) study.慢性非癌性疼痛患者的医疗服务利用情况:疼痛与阿片类药物治疗(POINT)研究的结果
Aust Health Rev. 2016 Nov;40(5):490-499. doi: 10.1071/AH15047.
4
Acupuncture or low frequency infrared treatment for low back pain in Chinese patients: a discrete choice experiment.针刺疗法或低频红外线疗法治疗中国患者的腰痛:一项离散选择实验
PLoS One. 2015 May 28;10(5):e0126912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126912. eCollection 2015.
5
Rates of opioid misuse, abuse, and addiction in chronic pain: a systematic review and data synthesis.慢性疼痛中阿片类药物滥用、误用及成瘾率:一项系统评价与数据综合分析
Pain. 2015 Apr;156(4):569-576. doi: 10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460357.01998.f1.
6
Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide.医疗保健中离散选择实验的样本量要求:实用指南。
Patient. 2015 Oct;8(5):373-84. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0118-z.
7
The prevalence and correlates of chronic pain and suicidality in a nationally representative sample.全国代表性样本中慢性疼痛与自杀倾向的患病率及其相关因素
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;49(9):803-11. doi: 10.1177/0004867415569795. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
8
The Pain and Opioids IN Treatment study: characteristics of a cohort using opioids to manage chronic non-cancer pain.疼痛与阿片类药物治疗研究:使用阿片类药物管理慢性非癌性疼痛的队列特征
Pain. 2015 Feb;156(2):231-242. doi: 10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460303.63948.8e.
9
National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop: the role of opioids in the treatment of chronic pain.美国国立卫生研究院预防途径研讨会:阿片类药物在慢性疼痛治疗中的作用。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb 17;162(4):295-300. doi: 10.7326/M14-2775.
10
The effectiveness and risks of long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review for a National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop.长期阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的效果和风险:美国国立卫生研究院预防途径研讨会的系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb 17;162(4):276-86. doi: 10.7326/M14-2559.