• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用二维超声矢量流成像优化三维无散度流场重建

Optimization of 3-D Divergence-Free Flow Field Reconstruction Using 2-D Ultrasound Vector Flow Imaging.

作者信息

Zhou Xinhuan, Vincent Peter, Zhou Xiaowei, Leow Chee Hau, Tang Meng-Xing

机构信息

Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.

Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019 Nov;45(11):3042-3055. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.06.402. Epub 2019 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.06.402
PMID:31378550
Abstract

3-D blood vector flow imaging is of great value in understanding and detecting cardiovascular diseases. Currently, 3-D ultrasound vector flow imaging requires 2-D matrix probes, which are expensive and suffer from suboptimal image quality. Our recent study proposed an interpolation algorithm to obtain a divergence-free reconstruction of the 3-D flow field from 2-D velocities obtained by high-frame-rate ultrasound particle imaging velocimetry (High Frame Rate echo-Particle Imaging Velocimetry, also known as HFR Ultrasound Imaging Velocimetry (UIV)), using a 1-D array transducer. The aim of this work was to significantly improve the accuracy and reduce the time-to-solution of our previous approach, thereby paving the way for clinical translation. More specifically, accuracy was improved by optimising the divergence-free basis to reduce Runge phenomena near domain boundaries, and time-to-solution was reduced by demonstrating that under certain conditions, the resulting system could be solved using widely available and highly optimised generalised minimum residual algorithms. To initially illustrate the utility of the approach, coarse 2-D subsamplings of an analytical unsteady Womersely flow solution and a steady helical flow solution obtained using computational fluid dynamics were used successfully to reconstruct full flow solutions, with 0.82% and 4.8% average relative errors in the velocity field, respectively. Subsequently, multiplane 2-D velocity fields were obtained through HFR UIV for a straight-tube phantom and a carotid bifurcation phantom, from which full 3-D flow fields were reconstructed. These were then compared with flow fields obtained via computational fluid dynamics in each of the two configurations, and average relative errors of 6.01% and 12.8% in the velocity field were obtained. These results reflect 15%-75% improvements in accuracy and 53- to 874-fold acceleration of reconstruction speeds for the four cases, compared with the previous divergence-free flow reconstruction method. In conclusion, the proposed method provides an effective and fast method to reconstruct 3-D flow in arteries using a 1-D array transducer.

摘要

三维血流矢量成像在理解和检测心血管疾病方面具有重要价值。目前,三维超声矢量血流成像需要二维矩阵探头,这类探头价格昂贵且图像质量欠佳。我们最近的研究提出了一种插值算法,该算法利用一维阵列换能器,从高帧率超声粒子图像测速技术(高帧率回波粒子图像测速技术,也称为HFR超声成像测速技术(UIV))获取的二维速度中,获得三维流场的无散度重建。这项工作的目的是显著提高我们之前方法的准确性并减少求解时间,从而为临床转化铺平道路。更具体地说,通过优化无散度基以减少域边界附近的龙格现象来提高准确性,通过证明在某些条件下,可以使用广泛可用且高度优化的广义最小残差算法来求解所得系统,从而减少求解时间。为了初步说明该方法的实用性,使用计算流体动力学获得的解析非定常沃默斯利流解和定常螺旋流解的粗二维子采样成功重建了全流解,速度场的平均相对误差分别为0.82%和4.8%。随后,通过HFR UIV获得了直管模型和颈动脉分叉模型的多平面二维速度场,并从中重建了全三维流场。然后将这些结果与在两种配置下通过计算流体动力学获得的流场进行比较,速度场的平均相对误差分别为6.01%和12.8%。与之前的无散度流重建方法相比,这些结果表明这四种情况的准确性提高了15%-75%,重建速度加快了53至874倍。总之,所提出的方法提供了一种使用一维阵列换能器重建动脉三维血流的有效且快速的方法。

相似文献

1
Optimization of 3-D Divergence-Free Flow Field Reconstruction Using 2-D Ultrasound Vector Flow Imaging.使用二维超声矢量流成像优化三维无散度流场重建
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019 Nov;45(11):3042-3055. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.06.402. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
2
3-D Flow Reconstruction Using Divergence-Free Interpolation of Multiple 2-D Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Particle Imaging Velocimetry Measurements.使用多幅二维对比增强超声粒子成像测速测量值的无散插值进行 3-D 流重建。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019 Mar;45(3):795-810. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.10.031. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
3
3-D Velocity and Volume Flow Measurement In Vivo Using Speckle Decorrelation and 2-D High-Frame-Rate Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.利用散斑相关和二维高速帧频对比增强超声技术在体测量三维速度和容积流量。
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2018 Dec;65(12):2233-2244. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2850535. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
4
Spatio-Temporal Flow and Wall Shear Stress Mapping Based on Incoherent Ensemble-Correlation of Ultrafast Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Images.基于超快对比增强超声图像非相干总体相关性的时空流与壁面切应力映射
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018 Jan;44(1):134-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.08.930. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
5
Ultrasound imaging velocimetry: effect of beam sweeping on velocity estimation.超声成像速度测量:波束扫描对速度估计的影响。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013 Sep;39(9):1672-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
6
Complex flow patterns in a real-size intracranial aneurysm phantom: phase contrast MRI compared with particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.真实尺寸颅内动脉瘤模型中的复杂流型:相位对比 MRI 与粒子图像测速和计算流体动力学比较。
NMR Biomed. 2012 Jan;25(1):14-26. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1706. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
7
Echo particle image velocimetry.回声粒子图像测速技术
J Vis Exp. 2012 Dec 27(70):4265. doi: 10.3791/4265.
8
Meshfree simulations of ultrasound vector flow imaging using smoothed particle hydrodynamics.基于光滑粒子流体动力学的超声向量流成像的无网格模拟。
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Oct 17;63(20):205011. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aae3c3.
9
A simulation environment for validating ultrasonic blood flow and vessel wall imaging based on fluid-structure interaction simulations: ultrasonic assessment of arterial distension and wall shear rate.基于流固耦合模拟的超声血流和血管壁成像验证的仿真环境:动脉扩张和壁切率的超声评估。
Med Phys. 2010 Aug;37(8):4318-30. doi: 10.1118/1.3462592.
10
Accelerating 4D flow MRI by exploiting vector field divergence regularization.利用矢量场散度正则化加速四维流动磁共振成像
Magn Reson Med. 2016 Jan;75(1):115-25. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25563. Epub 2015 Feb 13.