Department of Ecology, Environment and Evolution, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia; Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; Research Centre for Future Landscapes, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia; School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton Campus, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Department of Wildlife Conservation and Science, Zoos Victoria, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; School of BioSciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
Curr Biol. 2019 Aug 19;29(16):2711-2717.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.064. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
Reduced fitness as a result of inbreeding is a major threat facing many species of conservation concern [1-4]. However, few case studies for assessing the magnitude of inbreeding depression in the wild means that its relative importance as a risk factor for population persistence remains under-appreciated [5]. The increasing availability and affordability of genomic technologies provide new opportunities to address knowledge gaps around the magnitude and manifestation of inbreeding depression in wild populations [6-12]. Here, we combine over three decades of individual lifetime reproductive data and genomic data to estimate the relative lifetime and short-term fitness costs of both being inbred and engaging in inbreeding in the last wild population (<250 individuals remaining) of an iconic and critically endangered bird: the helmeted honeyeater Lichenostomus melanops cassidix. The magnitude of inbreeding depression was substantial: the mean predicted lifetime reproductive success of the most inbred (homozygosity = 0.82) individuals was on average 87%-90% lower than that of the least inbred (homozygosity = 0.75). For individual reproductive events and lifetime measures, we provide rare empirical evidence that pairing with a genetically dissimilar individual can reduce fitness costs associated with being an inbred individual. By comparing lifetime and short-term fitness measures, we demonstrate how short-term measures of reproductive success that are associated with only weak signatures of inbreeding depression can still underlie stronger lifetime effects. Our study represents a valuable case study, highlighting the critical importance of inbreeding depression as a factor influencing the immediate viability of populations in threatened species management.
由于近亲繁殖导致的适应能力下降是许多受到保护的物种面临的主要威胁[1-4]。然而,评估野外近亲繁殖程度的案例研究很少,这意味着其作为种群持续存在的风险因素的相对重要性仍未得到充分认识[5]。基因组技术的可用性和可负担性不断提高,为解决野生种群中近亲繁殖程度和表现的知识差距提供了新的机会[6-12]。在这里,我们结合了三十多年的个体终身繁殖数据和基因组数据,来估计在一个标志性的、极度濒危鸟类的最后一个野生种群(<250 只个体)中,处于近亲繁殖状态和进行近亲繁殖的相对终身和短期适应度成本:盔花蜜鸟 Lichenostomus melanops cassidix。近亲繁殖的衰退程度相当大:最近亲繁殖个体(杂合度=0.82)的平均预测终身繁殖成功率比最不近亲繁殖个体(杂合度=0.75)低 87%-90%。对于个体繁殖事件和终身指标,我们提供了罕见的实证证据,表明与遗传上不同的个体配对可以降低与近亲繁殖个体相关的适应度成本。通过比较终身和短期适应度指标,我们展示了与近亲繁殖程度相关的短期繁殖成功率指标如何仍然存在更强的终身影响。我们的研究代表了一个有价值的案例研究,突出了近亲繁殖衰退作为影响受威胁物种管理中种群即时生存能力的一个因素的关键重要性。