Suppr超能文献

肥胖儿童和青少年代谢综合征预测中体脂指数和身体成分指标:哪个更好?

Indexes of adiposity and body composition in the prediction of metabolic syndrome in obese children and adolescents: Which is the best?

机构信息

Marienklinik, Bolzano, Italy.

Observatory for Health Provincial Government South Tyrol, Italy.

出版信息

Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Nov;29(11):1189-1196. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jun 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

There is no agreement about which index of adiposity and/or body composition is the most accurate in identifying the metabolic syndrome (METS). The aim of our study was to compare the accuracy of the different indexes in order to recognize the most reliable.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated 1332 obese children and adolescents (778 females and 554 males), aged 14.4 ± 1.8 yrs, Body Mass Index (BMI) standard deviation scores (SDS) 2.99 ± 0.55, followed at the Istituto Auxologico Italiano, a tertiary center for childhood obesity. For each subject the following indexes were assessed: BMI, BMI SDS, Fat-Free Mass Index (FFMI), Fat Mass Index (FMI), Tri-Ponderal Mass Index (TMI), Waist-to-Height ratio (WtHR) and a new one, the Body Mass Fat Index (BMFI), which normalizes the BMI for percentage of body fat and the waist circumference. Thereafter we calculated for each index a threshold value for age and sex, in order to compare their accuracy, sensitivity and specificity in identifying the METS. There was a good correlation among indexes (p < 0.0001 for all). However, when the area under the curve (AUC) was compared, some of them, in particular the BMFI and the BMI, performed better than the other ones, although the differences were small.

CONCLUSIONS

BMI, which neither considers body composition nor fat distribution, performs as good as other indexes, and should therefore be the preferred one, also because of the easiness of its calculation.

摘要

背景与目的

目前尚无共识表明哪种肥胖指数和/或身体成分指标最能准确识别代谢综合征(METS)。本研究旨在比较不同指标的准确性,以识别最可靠的指标。

方法与结果

我们评估了 1332 名肥胖儿童和青少年(778 名女性和 554 名男性),年龄为 14.4±1.8 岁,体重指数(BMI)标准差评分(SDS)为 2.99±0.55,在意大利儿童肥胖综合研究所接受随访,这是一个儿童肥胖的三级中心。对于每个受试者,评估了以下指标:BMI、BMI SDS、去脂体重指数(FFMI)、脂肪质量指数(FMI)、三磅重指数(TMI)、腰高比(WtHR)和一个新的指标,即身体脂肪质量指数(BMFI),它对 BMI 进行了体脂百分比和腰围的标准化。然后,我们为每个指数计算了一个年龄和性别的阈值值,以比较它们在识别 METS 方面的准确性、敏感性和特异性。所有指数之间均存在良好的相关性(p<0.0001)。然而,当比较曲线下面积(AUC)时,其中一些指数,特别是 BMFI 和 BMI,表现优于其他指数,尽管差异较小。

结论

BMI 既不考虑身体成分也不考虑脂肪分布,其表现与其他指数一样好,因此应该是首选指数,也因为其计算相对简单。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验