• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

寻求刺激在面对面欺凌和网络欺凌中的差异作用:考虑感知到的情境属性

Sensation Seeking's Differential Role in Face-to-Face and Cyberbullying: Taking Perceived Contextual Properties Into Account.

作者信息

Graf Daniel, Yanagida Takuya, Spiel Christiane

机构信息

Department of Applied Psychology, Work, Education and Economy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 16;10:1572. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01572. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01572
PMID:31379651
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6646735/
Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated a relationship between sensation seeking and aggression. However, few studies have examined the relationships between sensation seeking and face-to-face and cyberbullying. The few existing studies assessed sensation seeking with items partly referring to antisocial behavior. This could have led to tautological findings. Moreover, contextual properties that could account for differences between bullying contexts (face-to-face, cyberspace) were neglected. Therefore, the first goal of this study was to investigate the relationships between sensation seeking and face-to-face and cyberbullying in a way that avoids tautological findings. Thus, sensation seeking was operationalized as a motivational disposition encompassing the dimensions "need for stimulation" and "avoidance of rest." Furthermore, students' perceptions of the contextual properties of the face-to-face and cyber context and their relevance for the relationships between the dimensions of sensation seeking and face-to-face and cyberbullying were examined. A total of 523 students ( = 17.83; = 2.13; ♀ = 37.4%) from four vocational schools answered online questionnaires on face-to-face and cyberbullying involvement, perceived contextual properties, and the two dimensions of sensation seeking during regular school hours. Structural equation modeling revealed positive associations between need for stimulation and both forms of bullying. Avoidance of rest, however, was positively related to cyberbullying only. The differences in all regression slopes between contexts were statistically significant. That is, the positive associations with the two dimensions of sensation seeking were stronger for cyberbullying than for face-to-face bullying. Dependent -tests revealed differences in students' perceptions of contextual properties between contexts (face-to-face, cyberspace). Nevertheless, no significant relationships between either dimension of sensation seeking and either form of bullying were moderated by any perceived contextual property. Our results demonstrate sensation seeking's greater role in cyberbullying and confirm differences in perceived contextual properties between the face-to-face and cyber context. Furthermore, the fact that no perceived contextual property moderated the significant relationships between the dimensions of sensation seeking and face-to-face or cyberbullying shows the relatively greater role of a single person factor compared to single contextual properties.

摘要

多项研究表明了寻求刺激与攻击性之间的关系。然而,很少有研究考察寻求刺激与面对面欺凌和网络欺凌之间的关系。现有的少数研究在评估寻求刺激时,所使用的项目部分涉及反社会行为。这可能导致同义反复的结果。此外,能够解释欺凌情境(面对面、网络空间)之间差异的情境属性被忽视了。因此,本研究的首要目标是以避免同义反复结果的方式,调查寻求刺激与面对面欺凌和网络欺凌之间的关系。因此,寻求刺激被定义为一种动机倾向,包括“对刺激的需求”和“对休息的回避”两个维度。此外,还考察了学生对面对面和网络情境的情境属性的认知,以及它们在寻求刺激维度与面对面和网络欺凌关系中的相关性。来自四所职业学校的523名学生(平均年龄=17.83岁;标准差=2.13;女生占37.4%)在正常上课时间回答了关于面对面和网络欺凌参与情况、感知到的情境属性以及寻求刺激的两个维度的在线问卷。结构方程模型显示,对刺激的需求与两种形式的欺凌之间均存在正相关。然而,对休息的回避仅与网络欺凌呈正相关。不同情境下所有回归斜率的差异具有统计学意义。也就是说,与寻求刺激的两个维度的正相关在网络欺凌中比在面对面欺凌中更强。相关样本t检验揭示了学生对不同情境(面对面、网络空间)的情境属性认知存在差异。然而,寻求刺激的任何一个维度与任何一种形式的欺凌之间,均未因任何感知到的情境属性而产生显著的调节关系。我们的研究结果表明寻求刺激在网络欺凌中发挥着更大的作用,并证实了面对面和网络情境在感知到的情境属性方面存在差异。此外,没有任何感知到的情境属性调节寻求刺激维度与面对面或网络欺凌之间的显著关系,这表明与单一情境属性相比,单一的个人因素发挥着相对更大的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc8e/6646735/f9a729af3f98/fpsyg-10-01572-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc8e/6646735/f9a729af3f98/fpsyg-10-01572-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc8e/6646735/f9a729af3f98/fpsyg-10-01572-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Sensation Seeking's Differential Role in Face-to-Face and Cyberbullying: Taking Perceived Contextual Properties Into Account.寻求刺激在面对面欺凌和网络欺凌中的差异作用:考虑感知到的情境属性
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 16;10:1572. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01572. eCollection 2019.
2
Does Sensation Seeking Lead to Adolescents' Cyberbullying Perpetration? The Mediating Role of Moral Disengagement and The Moderating Role of Perceived Social Support.感觉寻求是否会导致青少年实施网络欺凌?道德脱离的中介作用和感知社会支持的调节作用。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Dec;55(6):1724-1735. doi: 10.1007/s10578-023-01527-8. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
3
School Leadership and Cyberbullying-A Multilevel Analysis.学校领导力与网络欺凌——多层次分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 15;14(10):1226. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101226.
4
Triarchic Model Traits as Predictors of Bullying and Cyberbullying in Adolescence.三因素人格特质对青少年欺凌和网络欺凌的预测作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Mar;37(5-6):NP3242-NP3268. doi: 10.1177/0886260520934448. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
5
Is being a victim of bullying or cyberbullying in secondary school associated with subsequent risk-taking behavior in adolescence? A longitudinal study in secondary schools.在中学阶段遭受欺凌或网络欺凌是否会增加青少年时期的冒险行为?一项中学的纵向研究。
J Adolesc. 2022 Jun;94(4):611-627. doi: 10.1002/jad.12050. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
6
The role of personal and perceived peer norms in bullying and sexual harassment perpetration.个人和感知到的同伴规范在欺凌和性骚扰中的作用。
Sch Psychol. 2022 May;37(3):236-247. doi: 10.1037/spq0000498. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
7
Cyberbullying and School Bullying Are Related to Additive Adverse Effects among Adolescents.网络欺凌和校园欺凌与青少年的累加不良影响有关。
Psychopathology. 2023;56(1-2):127-137. doi: 10.1159/000523992. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
8
Trends in Cyberbullying and School Bullying Victimization in a Regional Census of High School Students, 2006-2012.2006 - 2012年高中生区域普查中的网络欺凌和校园欺凌受害情况趋势
J Sch Health. 2015 Sep;85(9):611-20. doi: 10.1111/josh.12290.
9
Analysis of the Explanatory Variables of the Differences in Perceptions of Cyberbullying: A Role-Based-Model Approach.网络欺凌认知差异的解释变量分析:基于角色模型的方法
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Mar;36(5-6):NP3388-NP3408. doi: 10.1177/0886260518772108. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
10
Longitudinal impact of the Cyber Friendly Schools program on adolescents' cyberbullying behavior.网络友好学校项目对青少年网络欺凌行为的纵向影响。
Aggress Behav. 2016 Mar-Apr;42(2):166-80. doi: 10.1002/ab.21609. Epub 2015 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Impacts of message sensation value and message appeal on viewer responses to YouTube anti-bullying videos.信息感知价值和信息吸引力对观众对YouTube反欺凌视频反应的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 24;15(1):10149. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92462-2.
2
Gender differences in teenager bullying dynamics and predictors of peer-to-peer intimidation.青少年欺凌行为动态及同伴间恐吓行为预测因素中的性别差异。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 16;9(9):e20243. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20243. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Approach versus Avoidance: A Self-Regulatory Perspective on Hypocrisy Induction in Anti-Cyberbullying CSR Campaigns.

本文引用的文献

1
Bullying: Recent Developments.欺凌:最新进展
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2004 Sep;9(3):98-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-3588.2004.00089.x.
2
Proximal and Distal Effects of Sensation Seeking and Parenting Environments on Alcohol Use Trajectories from Early Adolescence to Early Adulthood.感觉寻求和养育环境对青少年早期到成年早期饮酒轨迹的近端和远端影响。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Oct;47(10):2206-2219. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0874-x. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
3
Essential Oil of Japanese Cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) Wood Increases Salivary Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate Levels after Monotonous Work.
趋近与回避:反网络欺凌企业社会责任活动中伪善诱导的自我调节视角
J Bus Ethics. 2023 Mar 2:1-20. doi: 10.1007/s10551-023-05369-1.
4
The Role of Parents and Peers in Cyberbullying Perpetration: Comparison among Arab and Jewish and Youth in Israel.父母和同伴在网络欺凌行为中的作用:以色列阿拉伯、犹太青少年的比较
Child Indic Res. 2023;16(2):717-737. doi: 10.1007/s12187-022-09986-6. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
5
The Association between Appetitive Aggression and Social Media Addiction Mediated by Cyberbullying: The Moderating Role of Inclusive Norms.暴食攻击性与社交媒体成瘾的关系:网络欺凌的中介作用和包容规范的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 12;19(16):9956. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169956.
6
A tool for investigating the differential functions of aggressive behavior in the face-to-face and cyber context: Extending the Cyber-Aggression Typology Questionnaire.一种用于研究面对面和网络环境下攻击性行为差异功能的工具:扩展网络攻击行为类型问卷。
Aggress Behav. 2020 Sep;46(5):380-390. doi: 10.1002/ab.21894. Epub 2020 May 7.
日本柳杉木材精油可提高单调工作后的唾液硫酸脱氢表雄酮水平。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jan 21;14(1):97. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14010097.
4
Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory.HEXACO人格量表的心理测量特性。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2004 Apr 1;39(2):329-58. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8.
5
A systematic review and content analysis of bullying and cyber-bullying measurement strategies.欺凌与网络欺凌测量策略的系统评价与内容分析
Aggress Violent Behav. 2014 Jul-Aug;19(4):423-434. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2014.06.008.
6
Online Moral Disengagement, Cyberbullying, and Cyber-Aggression.网络道德脱离、网络欺凌和网络攻击。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015 Jul;18(7):400-5. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0670.
7
Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth.数字时代的欺凌行为:对青少年网络欺凌研究的批判性回顾和元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Jul;140(4):1073-137. doi: 10.1037/a0035618. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
8
The relationship between young adults' beliefs about anonymity and subsequent cyber aggression.年轻人对匿名的看法与随后的网络攻击之间的关系。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Dec;16(12):858-62. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2013.0009. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
9
Toward a conceptual model of motive and self-control in cyber-aggression: rage, revenge, reward, and recreation.迈向网络攻击中动机和自我控制的概念模型:愤怒、报复、奖励和娱乐。
J Youth Adolesc. 2013 May;42(5):751-71. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9936-2. Epub 2013 Mar 23.
10
School bullying: development and some important challenges.校园欺凌:发展与一些重要挑战
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:751-80. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185516. Epub 2013 Jan 3.