Veterans Affairs Capitol Health Care Network (VISN 5).
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2020 Jun;43(2):106-110. doi: 10.1037/prj0000385. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
The negative impacts of stigma on mental health treatment initiation are well established, but the relationship of stigma to proactive engagement in mental health treatment (e.g., actively working toward therapy goals) is largely unexamined. This study examined the relationship between mental health treatment engagement and stigma experiences, discrimination experiences, and internalized stigma among adults with serious mental illness. Age, race, gender, and education were tested as moderators of the relationships between stigma-related variables and treatment engagement.
Data were collected from 167 adults with serious mental illnesses who were receiving services at 5 psychosocial rehabilitation programs. Treatment engagement was assessed by participants' primary mental health care providers, using the Service Engagement Scale. The relationship between treatment engagement, stigma, and discrimination as well as potential demographic moderators were tested with Pearson's correlations and multiple linear regressions.
Treatment engagement was not correlated with experiences of stigma, experiences of discrimination, or application of stigmatizing beliefs to self. Gender, race, and age were not significant moderators but education was. Experiences of stigma were associated with greater treatment engagement in those with a higher level of education ( = .007), whereas application of stigma to one's self was associated with poorer treatment engagement in those with a higher level of education ( = .005).
Among individuals with higher levels of education, efforts to prevent internalization of public stigma may be crucial to promote proactive mental health treatment. Replication studies are needed to confirm these findings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
污名对心理健康治疗启动的负面影响已得到充分证实,但污名与积极参与心理健康治疗(例如,积极努力实现治疗目标)之间的关系在很大程度上尚未得到检验。本研究考察了严重精神疾病成年人的心理健康治疗参与度与污名体验、歧视体验和内化污名之间的关系。检验了年龄、种族、性别和教育在污名相关变量与治疗参与度之间的关系中的调节作用。
本研究的数据来自 167 名正在 5 个心理社会康复项目中接受服务的严重精神疾病成年人。使用服务参与量表评估参与者的主要精神卫生保健提供者的治疗参与度。使用 Pearson 相关系数和多元线性回归检验治疗参与度、污名和歧视与潜在人口统计学调节因素之间的关系。
治疗参与度与污名体验、歧视体验或将污名化信念应用于自身无关。性别、种族和年龄不是显著的调节因素,但教育是。在教育程度较高的个体中,污名体验与更高的治疗参与度相关( =.007),而将污名应用于自身与教育程度较高的个体中较差的治疗参与度相关( =.005)。
在教育程度较高的个体中,努力防止公众污名的内化可能对于促进积极的心理健康治疗至关重要。需要进行复制研究来证实这些发现。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。