Center for Family Research, University of Georgia.
Department of Psychology, University of Georgia.
J Fam Psychol. 2020 Mar;34(2):196-203. doi: 10.1037/fam0000583. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
This study examines the ways in which collecting data from individuals versus couples affects the characteristics of the resulting sample in basic research studies of romantic relationships. From a nationally representative sample of 1,294 individuals in a serious romantic relationship, approximately half of whom were randomly selected to invite their partner to participate in the study, we compare relationship, individual, and demographic characteristics among 3 groups: individuals randomized to invite their partner and whose partner participated in the study, individuals randomized to invite their partner but whose partner did not participate, and individuals who were not randomized to invite their partner. Results indicated that individuals whose partner participated reported the highest levels of relationship and individual well-being relative to comparison groups, as well as individuals who participated alone despite being asked to invite their partner, reported the lowest levels of relationship and individual well-being relative to comparison groups. Effect size magnitudes indicated the strongest group differences with respect to relationship variables, particularly cognitive appraisals of overall relationship stability and satisfaction. Implications for romantic relationship research and study design are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究考察了从个体和夫妻双方收集数据的方式如何影响浪漫关系基础研究中样本的特征。我们从一个全国代表性的 1294 名处于认真恋爱关系中的个体样本中选取了大约一半的个体进行随机抽样,邀请他们的伴侣参与研究,比较了 3 组人群的关系、个体和人口统计学特征:随机邀请伴侣并邀请成功的个体、随机邀请伴侣但伴侣未参与的个体、以及未被邀请伴侣的个体。结果表明,相对于对照组,其伴侣参与研究的个体报告的关系和个体幸福感水平最高,而尽管被要求邀请伴侣但实际并未邀请的个体报告的关系和个体幸福感水平最低。与对照组相比,效应量大小表明关系变量存在最强的组间差异,特别是对整体关系稳定性和满意度的认知评价。对浪漫关系研究和研究设计的启示进行了讨论。(APA,2020,所有权利保留)。