• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

夫妻双方共同应对阿尔茨海默病早期阶段:将痴呆的行为和心理症状与生活满意度联系起来。

Dyadic Ambivalence in Couples Managing Early-Stage Alzheimer's Disease: Linking Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia to Life Satisfaction.

机构信息

Department of Human Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.

Department of Human Development and Family Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Sep 1;79(9). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae130.

DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbae130
PMID:39079009
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11344209/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Caring for a spouse with Alzheimer's disease (AD) can elicit considerable distress but there are also positive moments. A growing body of work has examined caregivers' ambivalence in the care relationship and linked it to negative caregiver outcomes such as depression, but dyadic assessments of both parties' perspectives are missing. We examined ambivalence in both people with AD and their spousal caregivers, seeking to identify the correlates and well-being outcomes of such ambivalence in this unique context.

METHODS

Participants included 72 couples managing early-stage AD. People with AD and spousal caregivers independently self-reported positive and negative relationship qualities (used to indirectly calculate their ambivalence) and life satisfaction. Caregivers reported both partners' demographic characteristics and their spouses' behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), focusing on memory-related behaviors and psychological symptoms.

RESULTS

Path analyses revealed that the number and frequency of psychological symptoms in people with AD were positively associated with their own and caregivers' ambivalence. Caregivers' distress ratings of memory-related behaviors and psychological symptoms were positively associated with their ambivalence. Greater ambivalence was associated with lower life satisfaction in both spouses. BPSD directly affected both spouses' life satisfaction but there were also indirect effects via ambivalence.

DISCUSSION

This study utilizes a dyadic approach to assess ambivalence in dementia care. Findings reveal the conflicting emotions that couples experience as they cope with early-stage AD, identify sources of such ambivalence, and shed light on the development of dyadic interventions that can promote positive outcomes in both partners.

摘要

目的

照顾患有阿尔茨海默病(AD)的配偶会引起相当大的痛苦,但也有积极的时刻。越来越多的研究已经检查了照顾者在照顾关系中的矛盾心理,并将其与抑郁等负面照顾者结果联系起来,但缺乏对双方观点的对偶评估。我们在 AD 患者及其配偶照顾者中检查了矛盾心理,试图确定在这种特殊情况下这种矛盾心理的相关性和幸福感结果。

方法

参与者包括 72 对管理早期 AD 的夫妇。AD 患者和配偶照顾者分别自我报告积极和消极的关系质量(用于间接计算他们的矛盾心理)以及生活满意度。照顾者报告了双方的人口统计学特征以及他们配偶的行为和心理症状的痴呆症(BPSD),重点关注记忆相关的行为和心理症状。

结果

路径分析显示,AD 患者的心理症状数量和频率与他们自己和照顾者的矛盾心理呈正相关。照顾者对记忆相关行为和心理症状的困扰评分与他们的矛盾心理呈正相关。配偶的矛盾心理越大,生活满意度越低。BPSD 直接影响配偶双方的生活满意度,但也通过矛盾心理产生间接影响。

讨论

本研究采用对偶方法评估痴呆症护理中的矛盾心理。研究结果揭示了夫妻在应对早期 AD 时所经历的矛盾情绪,确定了这种矛盾心理的来源,并阐明了可以促进双方积极结果的对偶干预措施的发展。

相似文献

1
Dyadic Ambivalence in Couples Managing Early-Stage Alzheimer's Disease: Linking Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia to Life Satisfaction.夫妻双方共同应对阿尔茨海默病早期阶段:将痴呆的行为和心理症状与生活满意度联系起来。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Sep 1;79(9). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae130.
2
Empathy and support exchanges in couples coping with early-stage Alzheimer's disease.夫妻应对早发性老年痴呆症过程中的同理心和支持交流。
Aging Ment Health. 2024 Jul;28(7):995-1002. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2024.2326958. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Felt Age and Its Psychological Correlates in Dementia Spousal Caregiving Dyads: Findings From the IDEAL Programme.痴呆症配偶照顾者对偶中的感觉年龄及其心理相关性:来自 IDEAL 计划的结果。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Aug 1;79(8). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae105.
5
A systematic review of spousal couple-based intervention studies for couples coping with cancer: direction for the development of interventions.一项针对应对癌症的夫妻的基于配偶伴侣的干预研究的系统评价:干预措施的发展方向
Psychooncology. 2014 Jul;23(7):731-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.3535. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
6
The differential role of spousal collaboration on pain reactivity to daily stressors in older couples with and without multiple chronic conditions.配偶协作在患有和未患有多种慢性病的老年夫妇中对日常应激源疼痛反应的差异作用。
Ann Behav Med. 2025 Jan 4;59(1). doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaf045.
7
Informal caregivers' burden and chronic pain in older adults: a dyadic study unveiling the correlation and its impact.老年人非正式照料者的负担与慢性疼痛:一项揭示相关性及其影响的二元研究
Pain Manag. 2025 Mar;15(3):123-130. doi: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2467614. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
8
The Relationship Between Dyadic Coping and Mental Health in Stroke Survivors and Their Spouse Caregivers: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Model.中风幸存者及其配偶照顾者的二元应对与心理健康之间的关系:一种行为者-伙伴相互依赖模型
J Clin Nurs. 2025 Jul;34(7):2806-2816. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17478. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
9
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
10
Understanding the patient-spouse communication experience during chemotherapy for gastric cancer based on the couple's adaptation to cancer intimacy model: a directed content analysis.基于夫妻对癌症亲密关系模型的适应,理解胃癌化疗期间患者与配偶的沟通体验:一项定向内容分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 14;33(7):578. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09516-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Life satisfaction among persons living with dementia and those without dementia.痴呆症患者和非痴呆症患者的生活满意度。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Apr;71(4):1105-1116. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18174. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
2
Cross-cultural analysis of the role of ambivalent feelings for understanding caregivers' depressive symptoms.矛盾情感在理解照顾者抑郁症状中作用的跨文化分析
Aging Ment Health. 2023 Jul-Aug;27(7):1307-1312. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2116407. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
3
Neuropsychiatric or Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD): Focus on Prevalence and Natural History in Alzheimer's Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia.痴呆的神经精神或行为及心理症状(BPSD):聚焦于阿尔茨海默病和额颞叶痴呆的患病率及自然病程
Front Neurol. 2022 Jun 24;13:832199. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.832199. eCollection 2022.
4
Challenges and opportunities in conducting research with older adults with dementia during COVID-19 and beyond.在新冠疫情期间及之后对患有痴呆症的老年人进行研究的挑战与机遇。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 May;70(5):1306-1313. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17750. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
5
Caregiving Burden Among Caregivers of People With Dementia Through the Lens of Intersectionality.从交叉性视角看痴呆症患者照顾者的照顾负担。
Gerontologist. 2022 May 26;62(5):650-661. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab146.
6
Mothers' Functional Limitations and Relationship Quality With Adult Children: Exploring the Moderating Roles of Race and Gender.母亲的功能限制及与成年子女的关系质量:探究种族和性别的调节作用
Res Aging. 2022 May-Jun;44(5-6):414-425. doi: 10.1177/01640275211044834. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
7
Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia Due to AD: Relation With Disease Stage and Cognitive Deficits.阿尔茨海默病所致轻度认知障碍和痴呆中的神经精神症状:与疾病阶段和认知缺陷的关系。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 17;12:707580. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.707580. eCollection 2021.
8
Effectiveness of caregiver non-pharmacological interventions for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: An updated meta-analysis.照料者非药物干预对痴呆患者行为和心理症状的有效性:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Ageing Res Rev. 2021 Nov;71:101448. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101448. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
9
Stress, cognitive fusion and comorbid depressive and anxiety symptomatology in dementia caregivers.痴呆症照顾者的压力、认知融合与共病抑郁和焦虑症状。
Psychol Aging. 2021 Aug;36(5):667-676. doi: 10.1037/pag0000624.
10
Assessment of Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Timeliness and Comprehensiveness of Dementia Diagnosis in California.加利福尼亚州痴呆症诊断及时性和全面性的种族/民族差异评估。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Jun 1;78(6):657-665. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0399.