• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在具有全国代表性的荷兰浪漫伴侣样本中,寻求帮助步骤的患病率及预测因素。

Prevalence and predictors of help-seeking steps in a nationally representative Dutch sample of romantic couples.

作者信息

Conradi Henk Jan, Noordhof Arjen, Kamphuis Jan H

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Fam Process. 2025 Mar;64(1):e13074. doi: 10.1111/famp.13074. Epub 2024 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1111/famp.13074
PMID:39472288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11786145/
Abstract

Couples appear to frequently experience relationship problems, yet estimates of the prevalence and prediction of three distinct help-seeking steps, (1) recognition of serious relationship dissatisfaction, (2) considering help, and (3) receiving relationship help, are unknown for representative population samples. This is unfortunate as such knowledge may inform policy makers in the development of strategies to motivate couples to seek help. The prevalence of these steps along with reasons for not acquiring help was studied in a representative population sample of 1014 Dutch heterosexual couples. Multilevel Actor-Partner Interdependence Modeling (APIM) analyses estimated the extent to which static socio-demographic factors were predictive of help-seeking behaviors. Of all partners, 28.6% reported having ever been seriously dissatisfied with their relationship (step 1), of which 86.2% had told their partner they were dissatisfied, on average 1.5 years after onset of the dissatisfaction. Of the seriously dissatisfied partners 36.4% considered professional relationship help (step 2) and 19.5% eventually received help (step 3), on average 3.7 years after the onset of dissatisfaction. Of these, 88.5% consulted a (couple) therapist. Main reasons for not acquiring help were that "things got better" (48.8%) and "the partner did not want relationship help" (35.4%), whereas financial considerations and shame were rarely endorsed. Although serious relationship dissatisfaction was common (i.e., 40.1% of all couples consisted of at least one partner who was ever dissatified), few couples sought help and they did so rather late. Waxing and waning of dissatisfaction often guided the decision to not seek help. Women and younger partners were more proactive in help-seeking. Marital status, having children, and education were largely unrelated to help-seeking.

摘要

伴侣似乎经常会遇到关系问题,但对于具有代表性的人群样本而言,三种不同的寻求帮助步骤(1. 认识到严重的关系不满;2. 考虑寻求帮助;3. 接受关系帮助)的发生率和预测因素尚不清楚。这很遗憾,因为此类信息可能会为政策制定者制定激励伴侣寻求帮助的策略提供参考。我们在1014对荷兰异性恋伴侣的代表性人群样本中研究了这些步骤的发生率以及未寻求帮助的原因。多层次的行为者-伴侣相互依赖模型(APIM)分析估计了静态社会人口学因素对寻求帮助行为的预测程度。在所有伴侣中,28.6%的人报告曾对他们的关系感到严重不满(步骤1),其中86.2%的人在不满开始平均1.5年后告诉了伴侣他们的不满。在严重不满的伴侣中,36.4%的人考虑寻求专业的关系帮助(步骤2),19.5%的人最终接受了帮助(步骤3),平均在不满开始3.7年后。其中,88.5%的人咨询了(夫妻)治疗师。未寻求帮助的主要原因是“情况好转了”(48.8%)和“伴侣不希望寻求关系帮助”(35.4%),而经济考虑和羞耻感很少被提及。尽管严重的关系不满很常见(即40.1%的夫妻中至少有一方曾感到不满),但很少有夫妻寻求帮助,而且他们寻求帮助的时间相当晚。不满情绪的起伏往往影响了不寻求帮助的决定。女性和年轻伴侣在寻求帮助方面更积极主动。婚姻状况、是否有孩子和教育程度在很大程度上与寻求帮助无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866a/11786145/0eb1abab3589/FAMP-64-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866a/11786145/0eb1abab3589/FAMP-64-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/866a/11786145/0eb1abab3589/FAMP-64-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Prevalence and predictors of help-seeking steps in a nationally representative Dutch sample of romantic couples.在具有全国代表性的荷兰浪漫伴侣样本中,寻求帮助步骤的患病率及预测因素。
Fam Process. 2025 Mar;64(1):e13074. doi: 10.1111/famp.13074. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
2
Associations between body dissatisfaction and relationship functioning among same-sex female couples: An actor-partner interdependence model.同性伴侣中身体不满与关系功能的关系:一种主体间相互依赖模型。
J Fam Psychol. 2022 Aug;36(5):780-790. doi: 10.1037/fam0000945. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
3
Relationships between body image, sexual satisfaction, and relationship quality in romantic couples.浪漫伴侣中的体像、性满足与关系质量之间的关系。
J Fam Psychol. 2018 Jun;32(4):466-474. doi: 10.1037/fam0000407. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
4
Sexual dysfunction, depression, and marital dissatisfaction among Brazilian couples.巴西夫妇的性功能障碍、抑郁和婚姻不满。
J Sex Med. 2023 Feb 27;20(3):260-268. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdac004.
5
Profiles of Low-Income Help-Seeking Couples and Implications for Intervention Gains: A Couple-Centered Approach.低收入求助夫妇的特征及对干预效果的启示:以夫妇为中心的方法。
Behav Ther. 2024 May;55(3):443-456. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2023.08.002. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
6
Identifying Informal Help-Seeking Patterns in African American Couples.识别非裔美国夫妇寻求非正式帮助的模式。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2025 Apr;51(2):e70008. doi: 10.1111/jmft.70008.
7
Companionship goals and marital goal concordance contribute to relationship satisfaction partly through dyadic coping in dating couples.陪伴目标和婚姻目标的一致性部分通过情侣间的二元应对方式,对关系满意度产生影响。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2024 Nov;37(6):685-698. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2024.2338107. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
8
Association between help-seeking and motivation for completing a couple relationship education program across service modality.寻求帮助与完成夫妻关系教育计划的动机之间的关联,按服务模式划分。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2024 Oct;50(4):899-914. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12733. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
9
Marijuana use by intimate partners: Does discrepant use impair relationship functioning?伴侣间大麻使用:不一致的使用会损害关系功能吗?
Psychol Addict Behav. 2018 Jun;32(4):475-484. doi: 10.1037/adb0000357. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
10
The Significance of the Female Orgasm: A Nationally Representative, Dyadic Study of Newlyweds' Orgasm Experience.女性性高潮的意义:一项针对新婚夫妇性高潮体验的全国代表性对偶研究。
J Sex Med. 2018 Aug;15(8):1140-1148. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.05.018. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

本文引用的文献

1
How long do people wait before seeking couples therapy? A research note.人们在寻求夫妻治疗之前会等待多长时间?一篇研究简报。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2021 Oct;47(4):882-890. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12479. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
2
The path to couples therapy: A descriptive analysis on a Veteran sample.夫妻治疗之路:对退伍军人样本的描述性分析。
Couple Family Psychol. 2020 Jun;9(2):73-89. doi: 10.1037/cfp0000135.
3
Meta-analysis of couple therapy: Effects across outcomes, designs, timeframes, and other moderators.元分析夫妻治疗:结果、设计、时间框架和其他调节因素的影响。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Jul;88(7):583-596. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000514.
4
"Will you complete this survey too?" Differences between individual versus dyadic samples in relationship research.“你也会完成这份调查吗?”关系研究中个体样本与对偶样本的差异。
J Fam Psychol. 2020 Mar;34(2):196-203. doi: 10.1037/fam0000583. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
5
Barriers and facilitators of relationship help-seeking among low-income couples.低收入夫妇寻求关系帮助的障碍和促进因素。
J Fam Psychol. 2019 Mar;33(2):234-239. doi: 10.1037/fam0000485. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
6
Relationship Help-Seeking in a Danish Population Sample.丹麦人群样本中的寻求关系帮助。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2019 Jul;45(3):380-394. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12347. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
7
Effectiveness of the 'Hold me Tight' Relationship Enhancement Program in a Self-referred and a Clinician-referred Sample: An Emotionally Focused Couples Therapy-Based Approach.“抱紧我”关系强化方案对自我推荐和临床推荐样本的有效性:一种基于情绪聚焦夫妻治疗的方法。
Fam Process. 2018 Sep;57(3):613-628. doi: 10.1111/famp.12305. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
8
Unique Characteristics of Cohabiters Seeking Therapy.寻求治疗的同居者的独特特征。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2017 Jan;43(1):115-130. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12169. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
9
Research on the treatment of couple distress.夫妻困境治疗研究。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2012 Jan;38(1):145-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00249.x. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
10
A socio-emotional approach to couple therapy: linking social context and couple interaction.一种社会情感的伴侣治疗方法:将社会背景和伴侣互动联系起来。
Fam Process. 2010 Sep;49(3):369-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2010.01328.x.