Suppr超能文献

埃塞俄比亚西北部费莱格·希沃特专科医院器械助产相关的产妇并发症:一项回顾性横断面研究。

Maternal complication related to instrumental delivery at Felege Hiwot Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Biru Shimeles, Addisu Dagne, Kassa Simachew, Animen Simachew

机构信息

Department of Midwifery, College Of Medicine and Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.

Department of Midwifery, College Of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2019 Aug 5;12(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4530-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to determine proportion and risk factors for maternal complication related to forceps and vacuum delivery among mother who gave birth at Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (FHCSH).

RESULTS

Records of 406 mothers managed with instrumental vaginal delivery were reviewed and 97% of the reviewed card had complete documentation. The proportion of maternal complications related to instrumental delivery was 12.1%. A major complication of forceps assisted delivery was 2nd-degree perineal tear (7.4%), 3rd-degree perineal tear (1.5%), cervical tear (1.5%) and episiotomy extension (1%). However, the complication of vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery was only cervical tear (0.5%) and episiotomy extension (0.5%). Episiotomy during instrumental delivery reduce maternal complication by 86% [AOR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.07-0.3]. Forceps assisted vaginal delivery had 3.4 times more risk for maternal complication compared to vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery [AOR = 3.4, 95% CI 1.08-10.67] and the same is true for primiparity that primipara women who gave birth by the help of instrument had 3.5 times more risk for maternal complication compared to a multipara women [AOR = 3.5, 95% CI 1.26-9.98].

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定在费莱格·希沃特综合专科医院(FHCSH)分娩的母亲中,与产钳和真空吸引助产相关的孕产妇并发症的比例及危险因素。

结果

对406例接受器械助产的母亲的记录进行了回顾,97%的被审查病历有完整记录。器械助产相关的孕产妇并发症比例为12.1%。产钳助产的主要并发症为二度会阴裂伤(7.4%)、三度会阴裂伤(1.5%)、宫颈裂伤(1.5%)和会阴切开延长(1%)。然而,真空吸引助产的并发症仅为宫颈裂伤(0.5%)和会阴切开延长(0.5%)。器械助产时行会阴切开可使孕产妇并发症减少86%[调整后比值比(AOR)=0.14,95%置信区间(CI)0.07 - 0.3]。与真空吸引助产相比,产钳助产导致孕产妇并发症的风险高3.4倍[AOR = 3.4,95% CI 1.08 - 10.67],初产妇也是如此,即借助器械分娩的初产妇发生孕产妇并发症的风险比经产妇高3.5倍[AOR = 3.5,95% CI 1.26 - 9.98]。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
A comparative study of feto-maternal outcome in instrumental vaginal delivery.阴道助产分娩中母婴结局的比较研究
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2011 Dec;61(6):663-6. doi: 10.1007/s13224-011-0119-3. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
5
Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery.阴道助产器械的选择
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Nov 10(11):CD005455. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005455.pub2.
6
Operative vaginal deliveries in Zaria, Nigeria.尼日利亚扎里亚的手术阴道分娩
Ann Afr Med. 2009 Apr-Jun;8(2):95-9. doi: 10.4103/1596-3519.56236.
7
Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery.真空辅助阴道分娩。
Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Winter;2(1):5-17.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验