Hoorens Isabelle, Vossaert Katrien, Lanssens Sven, Dierckxsens Laurence, Argenziano Giuseppe, Brochez Lieve
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Ghent, Belgium.
Private Practice, Maldegem, Belgium.
Dermatol Pract Concept. 2019 Jul 31;9(3):200-206. doi: 10.5826/dpc.0903a05. eCollection 2019 Jul.
The use of dermoscopy improves the diagnosis of skin cancer significantly in trained dermatologists. However, to evaluate its cost-effectiveness in daily practice, not only sensitivity but also the excision rate is important.
We examined the diagnostic accuracy of cases from a true population-based sample scored by general dermatologists.
One hundred twenty-six dermatologists were randomly assigned to 145 digital cases of lesions detected at a skin cancer screening. This resulted in 4,655 case evaluations using a web application. Accuracy of diagnosis and treatment was correlated with the histological diagnosis or expert opinion.
The larger portion (89.7%) of the participating dermatologists reported using their dermatoscope daily. The odds of making a correct diagnosis of melanoma using dermoscopy was 5.38 compared with naked-eye examination (NEE). Dermoscopy increased sensitivity for skin cancer diagnosis from 70.6% to 84.6%, but this was associated with a small but significant decrease in specificity of 3.5%. To detect 1 skin cancer, 5.23 lesions had to be biopsied/excised in this sample and this was not significantly improved by dermoscopic evaluation. Dermoscopy significantly increased the confidence about making a correct diagnosis, especially in seborrheic keratosis, Bowen disease, and melanoma.
Dermoscopy significantly improved diagnostic accuracy, the sensitivity of skin cancer detection, and the confidence in diagnosis especially for seborrheic keratosis, Bowen disease, and melanoma. However, this finding was not reflected in a significant reduction in the number needed to excise in this sample.
在训练有素的皮肤科医生中,皮肤镜检查的使用显著提高了皮肤癌的诊断水平。然而,要评估其在日常实践中的成本效益,不仅敏感性很重要,切除率也很重要。
我们检查了由普通皮肤科医生对基于真实人群样本的病例进行评分的诊断准确性。
126名皮肤科医生被随机分配到145例在皮肤癌筛查中检测到的数字病变病例。这导致使用网络应用程序进行了4655次病例评估。诊断和治疗的准确性与组织学诊断或专家意见相关。
大部分(89.7%)参与的皮肤科医生报告每天使用皮肤镜。与肉眼检查(NEE)相比,使用皮肤镜正确诊断黑色素瘤的几率为5.38。皮肤镜检查将皮肤癌诊断的敏感性从70.6%提高到84.6%,但这与特异性小幅但显著下降3.5%相关。在该样本中,要检测出1例皮肤癌,必须对5.23个病变进行活检/切除,皮肤镜评估并未显著改善这一情况。皮肤镜显著提高了做出正确诊断的信心(尤其是在脂溢性角化病、鲍温病和黑色素瘤方面)。
皮肤镜显著提高了诊断准确性、皮肤癌检测的敏感性以及诊断信心,尤其是对脂溢性角化病、鲍温病和黑色素瘤。然而,这一发现并未在该样本中切除所需数量的显著减少中得到体现。