Herring Matthew J, White Melissa, Braman Jonathan P
Orthopaedic Trauma Institute (OTI), San Francisco General Hospital, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jul 29;7(7):2325967119859518. doi: 10.1177/2325967119859518. eCollection 2019 Jul.
Rotator cuff tears are common injuries that are reliably treated with arthroscopic repair, producing good to excellent results. The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) index is a validated disease-specific instrument used to assess patient outcomes; however, no study to date has correlated WORC index with treatment failure.
To evaluate the WORC index as a predictor for successful treatment in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. An additional purpose was to identify patient and tear characteristics associated with risk of treatment failure.
Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.
This study reviewed a total of 500 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Patient charts were reviewed for treatment failures, defined as persistent or recurrent shoulder pain or weakness, leading to further workup and identification of a failure to heal or recurrent tear by magnetic resonance imaging. Patient demographic and comorbidity data were gathered and correlated with risk of failure. All patients completed WORC questionnaires, and scores were correlated with risk of treatment failure.
There were 28 (5.6%) treatment failures at a median 28 weeks (SD, 42 weeks) postoperatively. Patients claiming workers' compensation were 3.21 times more likely (odds ratio; = .018) to fail treatment. Posterior interval tears (those including infraspinatus) were 3.14 times more likely ( = .01) to fail than anterior interval tears. Tear size was associated with treatment failure; the odds of failure was 3.24 for a 2-tendon tear and 5.83 for a 3-tendon tear ( = .03). Tears involving the nondominant arm were associated with an increased risk of failure by a factor of 3.04 (95% CI, 1.01-9.11; = .047). A WORC score ≥80 was associated with a 95% probability of treatment success at 1 year.
After arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, patients with WORC scores ≥80 at 1 year have a 95% probability of successful treatment and likely do not benefit from continued follow-up visits. Furthermore, several risk factors were identified that may influence outcomes after rotator cuff repair, including workers' compensation, location of tear, tear size, and hand dominance.
肩袖损伤是常见损伤,关节镜修复治疗效果可靠,能产生良好至优异的结果。西 Ontario 肩袖(WORC)指数是一种经过验证的针对特定疾病的工具,用于评估患者预后;然而,迄今为止尚无研究将 WORC 指数与治疗失败相关联。
评估 WORC 指数作为关节镜下肩袖修复成功治疗的预测指标。另一个目的是确定与治疗失败风险相关的患者和撕裂特征。
病例对照研究;证据等级,3 级。
本研究回顾了总共 500 例行关节镜下肩袖修复且至少随访 2 年的患者。查阅患者病历以确定治疗失败情况,治疗失败定义为持续或复发性肩部疼痛或无力,导致进一步检查并通过磁共振成像确定愈合失败或复发性撕裂。收集患者人口统计学和合并症数据,并与失败风险相关联。所有患者均完成 WORC 问卷,分数与治疗失败风险相关联。
术后中位 28 周(标准差,42 周)时有 28 例(5.6%)治疗失败。申请工伤赔偿的患者治疗失败的可能性高 3.21 倍(比值比;P =.018)。后方间隙撕裂(包括冈下肌的撕裂)治疗失败的可能性比前方间隙撕裂高 3.14 倍(P =.01)。撕裂大小与治疗失败相关;2 肌腱撕裂治疗失败的几率为 3.24,3 肌腱撕裂为 5.83(P =.03)。涉及非优势手臂的撕裂治疗失败风险增加 3.04 倍(95%可信区间,1.01 - 9.11;P =.047)。WORC 评分≥80 与 1 年时治疗成功的概率为 95%相关。
关节镜下肩袖修复术后,1 年时 WORC 评分≥80 的患者治疗成功的概率为 95%,可能无需继续随访。此外,确定了几个可能影响肩袖修复术后结果的风险因素,包括工伤赔偿情况、撕裂位置、撕裂大小和手的优势。