• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建模在癌症筛查政策决策过程中的作用:以前列腺特异性抗原筛查为例。

The role of modelling in the policy decision making process for cancer screening: example of prostate specific antigen screening.

作者信息

Getaneh Abraham M, Heijnsdijk Eveline Am, de Koning Harry J

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands,

Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Public Health Res Pract. 2019 Jul 31;29(2):2921912. doi: 10.17061/phrp2921912.

DOI:10.17061/phrp2921912
PMID:31384885
Abstract

Although randomised controlled trials are the preferred basis for policy decisions on cancer screening, it remains difficult to assess all downstream effects of screening, particularly when screening options other than those in the specific trial design are being considered. Simulation models of the natural history of disease can play a role in quantifying harms and benefits of cancer screening scenarios. Recently, the US Preventive Services Task Force issued a C-recommendation on screening for prostate cancer for men aged 55-69 years, implying at least moderate certainty that the benefit is small. However, modelling based on data from the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, which included quality-of-life estimates, showed that the ratio between benefits and harms is better, and likely to be reasonable, for men screened between the ages of 55 and 63 years (i.e. by using an earlier stopping age than applied in the trial setting). This commentary article considers the importance of simulation modelling in the decision-making process for (prostate) cancer screening. The paper also explores whether the recently published Cluster Randomized Trial of PSA Testing for Prostate Cancer, a trial of a single prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing intervention in the UK, changes the evidence for regular PSA testing for men aged 55-63 years by replicating the trial using a simulation model.

摘要

尽管随机对照试验是癌症筛查政策决策的首选依据,但评估筛查的所有下游影响仍然困难,尤其是在考虑特定试验设计之外的筛查选项时。疾病自然史的模拟模型可在量化癌症筛查方案的危害和益处方面发挥作用。最近,美国预防服务工作组对55至69岁男性的前列腺癌筛查发布了C级推荐,这意味着至少有中等程度的确定性认为益处很小。然而,基于前列腺癌筛查欧洲随机研究的数据进行的建模(其中包括生活质量评估)表明,对于55至63岁接受筛查的男性(即使用比试验设定更早的停止年龄),利弊比更好,且可能是合理的。这篇评论文章探讨了模拟建模在(前列腺)癌筛查决策过程中的重要性。本文还探讨了最近发表的英国一项针对前列腺癌的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测整群随机试验,通过使用模拟模型复制该试验,是否改变了55至63岁男性定期进行PSA检测的证据。

相似文献

1
The role of modelling in the policy decision making process for cancer screening: example of prostate specific antigen screening.建模在癌症筛查政策决策过程中的作用:以前列腺特异性抗原筛查为例。
Public Health Res Pract. 2019 Jul 31;29(2):2921912. doi: 10.17061/phrp2921912.
2
Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.前列腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3710.
3
Screening for prostate cancer: a guidance statement from the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.前列腺癌筛查:美国医师学院临床指南委员会的指导声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 May 21;158(10):761-769. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-10-201305210-00633.
4
American Urological Association (AUA) guideline on prostate cancer detection: process and rationale.美国泌尿外科学会 (AUA) 前列腺癌检测指南:流程和原理。
BJU Int. 2013 Sep;112(5):543-7. doi: 10.1111/bju.12318.
5
PSA testing for men at average risk of prostate cancer.对前列腺癌平均风险男性进行前列腺特异性抗原检测。
Public Health Res Pract. 2017 Jul 26;27(3):2731721. doi: 10.17061/phrp2731721.
6
Impact of the United States Preventive Services Task Force 'D' recommendation on prostate cancer screening and staging.美国预防服务工作组“D”级推荐对前列腺癌筛查及分期的影响
Curr Opin Urol. 2017 May;27(3):205-209. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000383.
7
Impact of Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Screening Trials and Revised PSA Screening Guidelines on Rates of Prostate Biopsy and Postbiopsy Complications.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查试验和修订的 PSA 筛查指南对前列腺活检率和活检后并发症的影响。
Eur Urol. 2017 Jan;71(1):55-65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
8
Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA Guideline.早期前列腺癌检测:AUA 指南。
J Urol. 2013 Aug;190(2):419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.119. Epub 2013 May 6.
9
Screening for Prostate Cancer Starting at Age 50-54 Years. A Population-based Cohort Study.50 - 54岁开始的前列腺癌筛查。一项基于人群的队列研究。
Eur Urol. 2017 Jan;71(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.026. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
10
Prostate cancer screening practices in a large, integrated health system: 2007-2014.大型综合医疗系统中的前列腺癌筛查实践:2007 - 2014年
BJU Int. 2017 Aug;120(2):257-264. doi: 10.1111/bju.13793. Epub 2017 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Burdens and SES in Alabama: Using Geographic Information System to Examine Prostate Cancer Health Disparity.阿拉巴马州的健康负担与社会经济地位:利用地理信息系统研究前列腺癌健康差异。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 2;14(19):4824. doi: 10.3390/cancers14194824.
2
Assessment of harms, benefits, and cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer screening: A micro-simulation study of 230 scenarios.前列腺癌筛查的危害、益处和成本效益评估:230 种情景的微观模拟研究。
Cancer Med. 2020 Oct;9(20):7742-7750. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3395. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
3
Personalized early detection and prevention of breast cancer: ENVISION consensus statement.
乳腺癌个体化早期检测和预防:ENVISION 共识声明。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov;17(11):687-705. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-0388-9. Epub 2020 Jun 18.