School of Criminal Justice & Criminalistics, California State University, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA.
New York City Department of Youth and Community Development, 2 Lafayette Street, 20th Floor, New York, NY, 10007, USA.
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Dec;48(12):2432-2450. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01090-3. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
Insight into the characteristics and system experiences for youth who touch both the child welfare and juvenile justice systems has increased over the last decade. These youth are typically studied as one population and referred to as "crossover youth." While this literature contributes valuable insight into who crossover youth are, studies are virtually silent on distinguishing characteristics and experiences across different pathways leading to dual system contact. This study reviews what is currently known about dual system youth generally (i.e., youth who have contact with both the juvenile justice and child welfare systems) and introduces a framework for consistently defining dual system youth and their pathways. The utility of the framework is then explored using linked administrative data for cohorts of youth aged 10 to 18 years old with a first petition to delinquency court in three sites: Cook County, Illinois between 2010 and 2014 (N = 14,170); Cuyahoga County, Ohio between 2010 and 2014 (N = 11,441); and New York City between 2013 and 2014 (N = 1272). The findings show a high prevalence of dual system contact overall, ranging from 44.8 to 70.3%, as well as wide variation in the ways in which youth touched both systems. Specifically, non-concurrent system contact is more prevalent than concurrent system contact in all sites, and individual characteristics and system experiences vary within and across these different pathway groups. Based on study findings, implications for future research on dual system youth and for developing collaborative practices and policies across the systems are discussed.
过去十年中,人们对同时接触儿童福利和少年司法系统的青年的特征和系统经验有了更多的了解。这些青年通常作为一个群体进行研究,并被称为“交叉青年”。虽然这些文献对交叉青年是谁提供了有价值的见解,但研究几乎没有说明导致双重系统接触的不同途径的特征和经验。本研究回顾了关于双重系统青年(即与少年司法和儿童福利系统都有接触的青年)的一般情况,介绍了一个一致定义双重系统青年及其途径的框架。然后,使用来自三个地点的 10 至 18 岁青年首次向少年法庭提出申诉的队列的链接行政数据,探讨了该框架的实用性:伊利诺伊州库克县(2010 年至 2014 年)(N=14170);俄亥俄州凯霍加县(2010 年至 2014 年)(N=11441);以及纽约市(2013 年至 2014 年)(N=1272)。研究结果表明,总体上双重系统接触的发生率很高,从 44.8%到 70.3%不等,而且青年接触两个系统的方式也存在很大差异。具体而言,非同时系统接触比所有地点的同时系统接触更为普遍,个体特征和系统经验在这些不同途径群体中存在差异。基于研究结果,讨论了未来关于双重系统青年的研究以及在系统之间发展协作实践和政策的意义。