Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2020 Jan;48(1):16-31. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00958-w.
Cognitive control, which allows for the selection and monitoring of goal-relevant behavior, is dynamically upregulated on the basis of moment-to-moment cognitive demands. One route by which these demands are registered by cognitive control systems is via the detection of response conflict. Yet working memory (WM) demands may similarly signal dynamic adjustments in cognitive control. In a delayed-recognition WM task, Jha and Kiyonaga (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 36(4), 1036-1042, 2010) demonstrated dynamic adjustments in cognitive control via manipulations of mnemonic load and delay-spanning cognitive interference. In the present study, we aimed to extend prior work by investigating whether affective interference may similarly upregulate cognitive control. In Experiment 1, participants (N = 89) completed a delayed-recognition WM task in which mnemonic load (memory load of one vs. two items) and delay-spanning affective interference (neutral vs. negative distractors) were manipulated in a factorial design. Consistent with Jha and Kiyonaga, the present results revealed that mnemonic load led to dynamic adjustments in cognitive control, as reflected by greater performance on trials preceded by high than by low load. In addition, we observed that affective interference could trigger dynamic adjustments in cognitive control, as evinced by higher performance on trials preceded by negative than by neutral distractors. These findings were subsequently confirmed in Experiment 2, which was a pre-registered replication study (N = 100). Thus, these results suggest that in addition to dynamic adjustments as a function of mnemonic load, affective interference, similar to cognitive interference (Jha & Kiyonaga Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 36(4), 1036-1042, 2010), may trigger dynamic adjustments in cognitive control during a WM task.
认知控制允许对目标相关行为进行选择和监控,它是根据即时的认知需求进行动态调节的。认知控制系统检测到反应冲突是一种登记这些需求的途径。然而,工作记忆 (WM) 需求也可能类似地发出认知控制的动态调整信号。在延迟识别 WM 任务中,Jha 和 Kiyonaga(《实验心理学杂志:学习、记忆与认知》,36(4),1036-1042,2010)通过操纵记忆负荷和延迟跨越认知干扰来证明认知控制的动态调整。在本研究中,我们旨在通过研究情感干扰是否也可以类似地增强认知控制来扩展先前的工作。在实验 1 中,参与者(N=89)完成了一个延迟识别 WM 任务,该任务以因子设计操纵了记忆负荷(记忆一个或两个项目的负荷)和延迟跨越的情感干扰(中性或负面干扰)。与 Jha 和 Kiyonaga 的结果一致,本研究结果表明,记忆负荷导致认知控制的动态调整,表现在高负荷试验之前的表现优于低负荷试验。此外,我们观察到情感干扰可以触发认知控制的动态调整,表现在负面干扰之前的试验的表现高于中性干扰。这些发现随后在实验 2 中得到了确认,这是一项预先注册的复制研究(N=100)。因此,这些结果表明,除了作为记忆负荷函数的动态调整外,情感干扰,类似于认知干扰(Jha 和 Kiyonaga《实验心理学杂志:学习、记忆与认知》,36(4),1036-1042,2010),可能在 WM 任务中触发认知控制的动态调整。