• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学生在线临床药理学课程资源评价。

Evaluation of online clinical pharmacology curriculum resources for medical students.

机构信息

Bachelor of Integrated Sciences Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Division of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Nov;85(11):2599-2604. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14085. Epub 2019 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1111/bcp.14085
PMID:31385322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6848894/
Abstract

AIMS

To identify and evaluate clinical pharmacology (CP) online curricular (e-Learning) resources that are internationally available for medical students.

METHODS

Literature searches of Medline, EMBASE and ERIC databases and an online survey of faculty members of international English language medical schools, were used to identify CP e-Learning resources. Resources that were accessible online in English and aimed to improve the quality of prescribing specific medications were then evaluated using a summary percentage score for comprehensiveness, usability and quality, and for content suitability.

RESULTS

Our literature searches and survey of 252 faculty (40.7% response rate) in 219 medical schools identified 22 and 59 resources respectively. After screening and removing duplicates, 8 eligible resources remained for evaluation. Mean total score was 53% (standard deviation = 13). The Australian National Prescribing Curriculum, ranked highest with a score of 77%, based primarily on very good ratings for usability, quality and suitable content.

CONCLUSION

Using a novel method and evaluation metric to identify, classify, and rate English language CP e-Learning resources, the National Prescribing Curriculum was the highest ranked open access resource. Future work is required to implement and evaluate its effectiveness on prescribing competence.

摘要

目的

确定和评估国际上可供医学生使用的临床医学(CP)在线课程(电子学习)资源。

方法

使用 Medline、EMBASE 和 ERIC 数据库的文献检索以及对国际英语医学学校的教师进行在线调查,以确定 CP 电子学习资源。然后,使用综合全面性、可用性和质量以及内容适宜性的总结百分比评分,对可在线获取且旨在提高特定药物处方质量的在线资源进行评估。

结果

我们的文献检索和对 219 所医学院 252 名教师(40.7%的回复率)的调查分别确定了 22 种和 59 种资源。经过筛选和删除重复项,有 8 种符合条件的资源可供评估。总平均得分为 53%(标准差=13)。澳大利亚国家处方课程的得分最高,为 77%,主要基于良好的可用性、质量和适宜内容的评分。

结论

使用一种新颖的方法和评估指标来识别、分类和评估英语 CP 电子学习资源,国家处方课程是排名最高的开放获取资源。需要进一步开展工作,以实施并评估其对处方能力的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3afb/6848894/dd05ac87e44c/BCP-85-2599-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3afb/6848894/dd05ac87e44c/BCP-85-2599-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3afb/6848894/dd05ac87e44c/BCP-85-2599-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of online clinical pharmacology curriculum resources for medical students.医学生在线临床药理学课程资源评价。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Nov;85(11):2599-2604. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14085. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
2
Teaching of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics in UK medical schools: current status in 2009.英国医学院临床药理学与治疗学教学:2009 年现状。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Jul;70(1):143-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03665.x.
3
Switching from a traditional undergraduate programme in (clinical) pharmacology and therapeutics to a problem-based learning programme.从传统的(临床)药理学和治疗学本科课程转向以问题为基础的学习课程。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Mar;77(3):421-429. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-03027-3. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
4
Gross Anatomy Education in China during the Covid-19 Pandemic: A National Survey.中国新冠疫情期间大体解剖学教育的全国性调查
Anat Sci Educ. 2021 Jan;14(1):8-18. doi: 10.1002/ase.2036. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
5
Developing confidence in basic prescribing skills during medical school: a longitudinal questionnaire study investigating the effects of a modified clinical pharmacology course.医学院校期间培养基本处方技能的信心:一项调查改良临床药理学课程效果的纵向问卷调查研究
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Oct;74(10):1343-1349. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2508-3. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
6
The role of undergraduate teaching, learning and a national prescribing safety assessment in preparation for practical prescribing: UK medical students' perspective.本科教学、学习和国家处方安全评估在实践处方准备中的作用:英国医学生的观点。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Oct;85(10):2390-2398. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14058. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
7
How curricular changes influence medical students' perceptions of basic science: A pilot study.课程改革如何影响医学生对基础科学的认知:一项试点研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 22;15(7):e0236365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236365. eCollection 2020.
8
Improving the Pharmacology Curriculum at a German Medical School: A Structured Plan Based on a Student-Guided Large-Scale Study.改进德国医学院药理学课程:基于学生主导的大规模研究的结构化计划。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Aug;59(8):1151-1157. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1410. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
9
Pre-clinical remote undergraduate medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey study.COVID-19 大流行期间的临床前远程本科医学教育:一项调查研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02445-2.
10
Efforts to cope with CBME in COVID-19 era to teach biochemistry in medical college.在新冠疫情时代应对基于能力的医学教育以在医学院教授生物化学的努力。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2020 Nov;48(6):670-674. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21469. Epub 2020 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparability of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) and Written Tests for Assessing Medical School Students' Competencies: A Scoping Review.客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)与笔试评估医学生能力的可比性:范围综述。
Eval Health Prof. 2023 Sep;46(3):213-224. doi: 10.1177/01632787231165797. Epub 2023 Mar 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Prescribing competency assessment for Canadian medical students: a pilot evaluation.加拿大医学生的处方能力评估:一项试点评估。
Can Med Educ J. 2019 Mar 13;10(1):e103-e110. eCollection 2019 Mar.
2
Prescribing Competency of Medical Students: National Survey of Medical Education Leaders.医学生的处方能力:医学教育领导者全国调查
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Feb 2;25(1):e18-e24. doi: 10.22374/1710-6222.25.1.2.
3
Pharmacology and Therapeutics Education in the European Union Needs Harmonization and Modernization: A Cross-sectional Survey Among 185 Medical Schools in 27 Countries.
欧盟的药理学与治疗学教育需要协调与现代化:对27个国家185所医学院校的横断面调查
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Nov;102(5):815-822. doi: 10.1002/cpt.682. Epub 2017 May 30.
4
Quality specifications in postgraduate medical e-learning: an integrative literature review leading to a postgraduate medical e-learning model.研究生医学电子学习中的质量规范:一项综合文献综述,形成研究生医学电子学习模型。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 8;16:168. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0700-7.
5
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
6
Development and Validation of the McMaster Prescribing Competency Assessment for Medical Trainees (MacPCA).医学生麦克马斯特处方能力评估(MacPCA)的开发与验证
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2015;22(2):e173-8. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
7
Prescribing and the core curriculum for tomorrow's doctors: BPS curriculum in clinical pharmacology and prescribing for medical students.为明天的医生制定处方和核心课程:医学生临床药理学和处方的 BPS 课程。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Oct;74(4):644-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04186.x.
8
Improved junior paediatric prescribing skills after a short e-learning intervention: a randomised controlled trial.短期电子学习干预后,儿童初级处方技能提高:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Dis Child. 2011 Dec;96(12):1191-4. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-300577.
9
Defining quality criteria for online continuing medical education modules using modified nominal group technique.使用改良的名义小组技术定义在线继续医学教育模块的质量标准。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2010 Fall;30(4):246-50. doi: 10.1002/chp.20089.
10
Teaching of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics in UK medical schools: current status in 2009.英国医学院临床药理学与治疗学教学:2009 年现状。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Jul;70(1):143-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03665.x.