• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大医学生的处方能力评估:一项试点评估。

Prescribing competency assessment for Canadian medical students: a pilot evaluation.

作者信息

Holbrook Anne, Liu J Tiger, Rieder Michael, Gibson Michelle, Levine Mitchell, Foster Gary, Perri Dan, Maxwell Simon

机构信息

Division of Clinical Pharmacology, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Can Med Educ J. 2019 Mar 13;10(1):e103-e110. eCollection 2019 Mar.

PMID:30949264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6445319/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The knowledge and ability to prescribe safely and effectively is a core competency for every graduating medical student. Our previous research suggested concerns about medical student prescribing abilities, and interest in a standardized assessment process.

METHODS

A multi-year cross-sectional study evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and discriminative ability of an online prescribing competency assessment for final year Canadian medical students was conducted. Students at nine sites of four Ontario medical schools were invited to participate in an online one-hour exam of eight domains related to prescribing safely. Student feedback on perceived fairness, clarity, and ease of use formed the primary outcome. Exam performance and parity between schools were the secondary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 714 students completed the assessment during spring final review courses between 2016 and 2018. Student feedback was more favourable than not for appropriateness of content (53.5% agreement vs 18.3% disagreement), clarity of questions (65.5% agreement vs 11.6% disagreement), question layout and presentation (70.8% agreement vs 12.2% disagreement), and ease of use of online interface (67.1% agreement vs 13.6% disagreement). Few (23.6% believed their course work had prepared them for the assessment. Mean total exam score was 70.0% overall (SD 10.4%), with 47.6% scoring at or above the pass threshold of 70%. Our prescribing competency assessment proved feasible, acceptable, and discriminative, and indicated a need for better medical school training to improve prescribing competency. Further evaluation in a larger sample of medical schools is warranted.

摘要

背景

安全有效地开具处方的知识和能力是每一位即将毕业的医学生的核心能力。我们之前的研究表明对医学生开具处方能力存在担忧,并且对标准化评估过程有兴趣。

方法

开展了一项多年的横断面研究,评估针对加拿大最后一年医学生的在线处方能力评估的可行性、可接受性和区分能力。邀请了安大略省四所医学院九个地点的学生参加一场与安全开具处方相关的八个领域的在线一小时考试。学生对感知到的公平性、清晰度和易用性的反馈构成主要结果。考试成绩和学校之间的均等性是次要结果。

结果

在2016年至2018年春季期末考试复习课程期间,共有714名学生完成了评估。学生对内容适当性(53.5%表示同意,18.3%表示不同意)、问题清晰度(65.5%表示同意,11.6%表示不同意)、问题布局和呈现方式(70.8%表示同意,12.2%表示不同意)以及在线界面易用性(67.1%表示同意,13.6%表示不同意)的反馈大多是积极的。很少有学生(23.6%)认为他们的课程作业使他们为评估做好了准备。总体平均考试成绩为70.0%(标准差10.4%),47.6%的学生得分达到或高于70%的及格线。我们的处方能力评估被证明是可行的、可接受的且具有区分能力,并表明需要更好的医学院培训来提高处方能力。有必要在更多医学院样本中进行进一步评估。

相似文献

1
Prescribing competency assessment for Canadian medical students: a pilot evaluation.加拿大医学生的处方能力评估:一项试点评估。
Can Med Educ J. 2019 Mar 13;10(1):e103-e110. eCollection 2019 Mar.
2
Prescribing Competency of Medical Students: National Survey of Medical Education Leaders.医学生的处方能力:医学教育领导者全国调查
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Feb 2;25(1):e18-e24. doi: 10.22374/1710-6222.25.1.2.
3
Piloting the United Kingdom 'Prescribing Safety Assessment' with pharmacist prescribers in Scotland.在苏格兰,与药剂师处方者一起试行英国“处方安全评估”。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Jan;14(1):62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.12.009. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
4
Development and Validation of the McMaster Prescribing Competency Assessment for Medical Trainees (MacPCA).医学生麦克马斯特处方能力评估(MacPCA)的开发与验证
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2015;22(2):e173-8. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
5
Student and pre-registration pharmacist performance in a UK Prescribing Assessment.英国处方评估中,学生和预注册药剂师的表现。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Feb;44(1):100-109. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01317-z. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
6
Moving toward Mastery: Changes in Student Perceptions of Clerkship Assessment with Pass/Fail Grading and Enhanced Feedback.迈向精通:学生对采用及格/不及格评分及强化反馈的临床实习评估看法的变化
Teach Learn Med. 2022 Apr-May;34(2):198-208. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2021.1922285. Epub 2021 May 20.
7
[Prescribing knowledge in final-year medical students attending a curriculum without a summative prescribing exam].[参加无总结性处方考试课程的医学专业最后一年学生的处方知识]
Lakartidningen. 2020 Oct 20;117:19255.
8
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
9
Implementation and assessment of a module to enhance prescribing competency in undergraduate medical students.一个提高本科医学生处方能力模块的实施与评估
Med J Armed Forces India. 2021 Feb;77(Suppl 1):S122-S128. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.12.025. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
10
Do final-year medical students have sufficient prescribing competencies? A systematic literature review.应届医学专业毕业生是否具备足够的处方能力?一项系统文献回顾。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Apr;84(4):615-635. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13491. Epub 2018 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Confidence in Prescribing Practices: Perspectives of Senior Medical Students and Recent Graduates at Qatar University.对处方实践的信心:卡塔尔大学高年级医学生和应届毕业生的观点
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024 Dec 28;15:1325-1337. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S476352. eCollection 2024.
2
Assessment and evaluation of prescribing competences: A systematic review and recommendations.处方能力的评估与评价:一项系统综述及建议
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Aug;91(8):2119-2137. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16033. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
3
A pharmacist-led interprofessional learning experience for family practice medical residents specializing in HIV care.药剂师主导的家庭医学住院医师艾滋病护理专业的跨专业学习体验。
Can Med Educ J. 2023 Nov 8;14(5):110-112. doi: 10.36834/cmej.75940. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Comparability of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) and Written Tests for Assessing Medical School Students' Competencies: A Scoping Review.客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)与笔试评估医学生能力的可比性:范围综述。
Eval Health Prof. 2023 Sep;46(3):213-224. doi: 10.1177/01632787231165797. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
5
Online assessment in two consequent semesters during COVID-19 pandemic: K-means clustering using data mining approach.新冠疫情期间两个连续学期的在线评估:使用数据挖掘方法的K均值聚类
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Sep 28;11:307. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1466_21. eCollection 2022.
6
Evaluation of Eight-Item Vancomycin Prescribing Confidence Questionnaire Among Junior Doctors.初级医生中八项万古霉素处方信心问卷的评估
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 May 28;8:677818. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.677818. eCollection 2021.
7
Evaluation of online clinical pharmacology curriculum resources for medical students.医学生在线临床药理学课程资源评价。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Nov;85(11):2599-2604. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14085. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
8
From origins to legacy: the fruits of Canadian medical education scholarship.从起源到传承:加拿大医学教育学术成果
Can Med Educ J. 2019 Mar 13;10(1):e1-e4. eCollection 2019 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Prescribing Competency of Medical Students: National Survey of Medical Education Leaders.医学生的处方能力:医学教育领导者全国调查
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Feb 2;25(1):e18-e24. doi: 10.22374/1710-6222.25.1.2.
2
Key Learning Outcomes for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Education in Europe: A Modified Delphi Study.欧洲临床药理学与治疗学教育的关键学习成果:一项改良 Delphi 研究。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Aug;104(2):317-325. doi: 10.1002/cpt.962. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
3
Prescribing Safety Assessment 2016: Delivery of a national prescribing assessment to 7343 UK final-year medical students.2016 年处方安全评估:向 7343 名英国医学应届毕业生提供全国性处方评估。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;83(10):2249-2258. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13319. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
4
Development and Validation of the McMaster Prescribing Competency Assessment for Medical Trainees (MacPCA).医学生麦克马斯特处方能力评估(MacPCA)的开发与验证
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2015;22(2):e173-8. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
5
Prescribing safety: ensuring that new graduates are prepared.处方安全:确保新毕业生做好准备。
Lancet. 2015 Feb 14;385(9968):579-581. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62339-4.
6
Assessing prescribing competence.评估处方能力。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Oct;74(4):632-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04151.x.
7
Prevention of medication errors: teaching and training.预防用药差错:教学与培训。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Jun;67(6):656-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03423.x.
8
Lack of pharmacological training causes overuse and misuse of drugs.缺乏药理学培训导致药物的过度使用和滥用。
CMAJ. 2008 Jan 29;178(3):276. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.071819.
9
Physician scores on a national clinical skills examination as predictors of complaints to medical regulatory authorities.医生在全国临床技能考试中的成绩作为向医疗监管机构投诉的预测指标。
JAMA. 2007 Sep 5;298(9):993-1001. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.9.993.
10
The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada.加拿大不良事件研究:加拿大医院患者中不良事件的发生率。
CMAJ. 2004 May 25;170(11):1678-86. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040498.