• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有社会风险因素的女性如何体验英国的产妇护理?一个现实主义的综合。

How do women with social risk factors experience United Kingdom maternity care? A realist synthesis.

机构信息

Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Science, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, North Wing St. Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, UK.

Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Birth. 2019 Sep;46(3):461-474. doi: 10.1111/birt.12446. Epub 2019 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1111/birt.12446
PMID:31385354
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6771833/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Echoing international trends, the most recent United Kingdom reports of infant and maternal mortality found that pregnancies to women with social risk factors are over 50% more likely to end in stillbirth or neonatal death and carry an increased risk of premature birth and maternal death. The aim of this realist synthesis was to uncover the mechanisms that affect women's experiences of maternity care.

METHODS

Using realist methodology, 22 papers exploring how women with a wide range of social risk factors experience maternity care in the United Kingdom were included. The data extraction process identified contexts (C), mechanisms (M), and outcomes (0).

RESULTS

Three themes, Resources, Relationships, and Candidacy, overarched eight CMO configurations. Access to services, appropriate education, interpreters, practical support, and continuity of care were particularly relevant for women who are unfamiliar with the United Kingdom system and those living chaotic lives. For women with experience of trauma, or those who lack a sense of control, a trusting relationship with a health care professional was key to regaining trust. Many women who have social care involvement during their pregnancy perceive health care services as a system of surveillance rather than support, impacting on their engagement. This, as well as experiences of paternalistic care and discrimination, could be mitigated through the ability to develop trusting relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings provide underlying theory and practical guidance on how to develop safe services that aim to reduce inequalities in women's experiences and birth outcomes.

摘要

背景

呼应国际趋势,英国最近关于婴儿和产妇死亡率的报告发现,社会风险因素较高的孕妇出现死产或新生儿死亡的可能性高出 50%,早产和产妇死亡的风险也增加。本真实主义综合研究旨在揭示影响女性分娩体验的机制。

方法

使用真实主义方法,纳入了 22 篇探讨英国各种社会风险因素的女性体验分娩护理的研究。数据提取过程确定了背景(C)、机制(M)和结果(0)。

结果

三个主题,资源、关系和资格,涵盖了八个 CMO 配置。对于不熟悉英国系统和生活混乱的女性,获得服务、适当的教育、翻译、实际支持和护理连续性尤为重要。对于有创伤经历或缺乏控制感的女性来说,与医疗保健专业人员建立信任关系是重新获得信任的关键。许多在怀孕期间有社会关怀介入的女性将医疗保健服务视为一种监控系统,而不是支持系统,这影响了她们的参与度。这一点,以及家长式护理和歧视的经历,可以通过建立信任关系来缓解。

结论

研究结果为如何开发旨在减少女性体验和分娩结果不平等的安全服务提供了基础理论和实际指导。

相似文献

1
How do women with social risk factors experience United Kingdom maternity care? A realist synthesis.具有社会风险因素的女性如何体验英国的产妇护理?一个现实主义的综合。
Birth. 2019 Sep;46(3):461-474. doi: 10.1111/birt.12446. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
2
Marvellous to mediocre: findings of national survey of UK practice and provision of care in pregnancies after stillbirth or neonatal death.从出色到平庸:英国死胎或新生儿死亡后妊娠护理实践与服务的全国性调查结果
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 May 6;16:101. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0891-2.
3
Preliminary findings on the experiences of care for parents who suffered perinatal bereavement during the COVID-19 pandemic.COVID-19 大流行期间,围产期丧亲父母的护理体验初步研究结果。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Dec 22;21(1):840. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04292-5.
4
A realist review to explore how midwifery continuity of care may influence preterm birth in pregnant women.一项实证性综述,旨在探究连续性助产护理如何影响孕妇早产。
Birth. 2021 Sep;48(3):375-388. doi: 10.1111/birt.12547. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
5
Strengthening open disclosure in maternity services in the English NHS: the DISCERN realist evaluation study.加强英国国民保健制度产科服务中的公开披露:DISCERN 现实主义评价研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(22):1-159. doi: 10.3310/YTDF8015.
6
The perinatal bereavement project: development and evaluation of supportive guidelines for families experiencing stillbirth and neonatal death in Southeast Brazil-a quasi-experimental before-and-after study.围产期丧亲项目:为巴西东南部经历死产和新生儿死亡的家庭制定和评估支持性指南-一项准实验性前后研究。
Reprod Health. 2021 Jan 6;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-01040-4.
7
Black, Asian and minority ethnic women's experiences of maternity services in the UK: A qualitative evidence synthesis.英国黑人和少数族裔女性在孕产服务方面的体验:定性证据综合分析。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Jul;78(7):2175-2190. doi: 10.1111/jan.15233. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
8
Better maternity care pathways in pregnancies after stillbirth or neonatal death: a feasibility study.死胎或新生儿死亡后妊娠的更好孕产照护路径:一项可行性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Aug 10;22(1):634. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04925-3.
9
Understanding for whom, under what conditions and how smoking cessation services for pregnant women in the United Kingdom work-a rapid realist review.了解在英国,为哪些孕妇、在什么条件下以及如何提供戒烟服务——一项快速的现实审查。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 12;23(1):2488. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17378-w.
10
Midwifery continuity of care versus standard maternity care for women at increased risk of preterm birth: A hybrid implementation-effectiveness, randomised controlled pilot trial in the UK.助产连续性护理与标准产科护理对早产风险增加的妇女:英国混合实施效果随机对照试点试验。
PLoS Med. 2020 Oct 6;17(10):e1003350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003350. eCollection 2020 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Diversity in Recruitment: Lessons Learned During the REACH Pregnancy Circles Pilot Trial.提高招募的多样性:REACH孕期交流圈试点试验中的经验教训
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70300. doi: 10.1111/hex.70300.
2
Supporting safe disclosure of sexual violence in healthcare settings: findings from a realist evaluation applying candidacy theory through a trauma-focused lens.支持在医疗环境中安全披露性暴力:通过以创伤为重点的视角应用候选资格理论的现实主义评价结果
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 17;15(4):e097940. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097940.
3
What Do Antenatal Women Want From Their Antenatal Education? A National Survey.

本文引用的文献

1
Testing the effectiveness of REACH Pregnancy Circles group antenatal care: protocol for a randomised controlled pilot trial.测试“孕期关爱圈”小组产前护理的有效性:一项随机对照试验性研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Nov 10;4:169. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0361-x. eCollection 2018.
2
Asking different questions: A call to action for research to improve the quality of care for every woman, every child.提出不同问题:呼吁开展研究以提高对每位妇女、每个儿童的护理质量。
Birth. 2018 Sep;45(3):222-231. doi: 10.1111/birt.12361. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
3
Maternity experiences of mothers with multiple disadvantages in England: A qualitative study.
产前女性对她们的产前教育有何期望?一项全国性调查。
Matern Child Health J. 2025 Mar;29(3):324-337. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04048-z. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
4
Optimising digital clinical consultations in maternity care: a realist review and implementation principles.优化产科医疗中的数字临床咨询:一个现实主义的回顾和实施原则。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 1;14(10):e079153. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079153.
5
Participatory Surveillance and Candidacy: A Discourse Analysis of Views on Self-Testing for Proteinuria in Pregnancy.参与式监测与候选资格:关于孕期蛋白尿自我检测观点的话语分析
Qual Health Res. 2025 Jul;35(8):863-875. doi: 10.1177/10497323241274270. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
6
Healthcare experiences of pregnant and postnatal women and healthcare professionals when facing child protection in the perinatal period: A systematic review and Critical Interpretative Synthesis.围产期儿童保护背景下孕妇和产后女性及其医护人员的医疗体验:系统评价与关键解释性综合。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 3;19(7):e0305738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305738. eCollection 2024.
7
Understanding access to general practice through the lens of candidacy: a critical review of the literature.从候选视角理解全科医生的可及性:文献的批判性回顾。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Sep 26;74(747):e683-e694. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0033. Print 2024 Oct.
8
Impact of maternal risk factors on ethnic disparities in maternal mortality: a national population-based cohort study.孕产妇风险因素对孕产妇死亡率种族差异的影响:一项基于全国人口的队列研究。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Mar 29;40:100893. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100893. eCollection 2024 May.
9
Initial programme theory development: The first step in a realist evaluation of a cross-sectoral intervention for expectant Danish parents living with psychosocial risks.初始方案理论发展:对丹麦有心理社会风险的孕妇父母进行跨部门干预的现实主义评估的第一步。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 20;18(12):e0295378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295378. eCollection 2023.
10
Targeted health and social care interventions for women and infants who are disproportionately impacted by health inequalities in high-income countries: a systematic review.针对在高收入国家中受到健康不平等不成比例影响的妇女和婴儿的有针对性的卫生和社会保健干预措施:系统评价。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Jul 11;22(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01948-w.
英格兰多劣势母亲的孕产经历:一项定性研究。
Women Birth. 2019 Apr;32(2):178-184. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
4
Building capacity and wellbeing in vulnerable/marginalised mothers: A qualitative study.建设弱势/边缘母亲的能力和幸福感:一项定性研究。
Women Birth. 2018 Oct;31(5):e341-e347. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.12.010. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
5
Maternity care for trafficked women: Survivor experiences and clinicians' perspectives in the United Kingdom's National Health Service.被拐卖妇女的孕产护理:英国国民医疗服务体系中幸存者的经历及临床医生的观点
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 22;12(11):e0187856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187856. eCollection 2017.
6
The midwife-woman relationship in a South Wales community: Experiences of midwives and migrant Pakistani women in early pregnancy.南威尔士社区的助产士-产妇关系:初产妇中的助产士和移民巴基斯坦妇女的经历。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):347-357. doi: 10.1111/hex.12629. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
7
Do cardiometabolic, behavioural and socioeconomic factors explain the 'healthy migrant effect' in the UK? Linked mortality follow-up of South Asians compared with white Europeans in the Newcastle Heart Project.心血管代谢、行为和社会经济因素能否解释英国的“健康移民效应”?纽卡斯尔心脏项目中南亚人与欧洲白人的关联死亡率随访研究
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Jul 25. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209348.
8
'The Healthy Migrant Effect' for Mental Health in England: Propensity-score Matched Analysis Using the EMPIRIC Survey.英国心理健康领域的“健康移民效应”:基于经验调查的倾向得分匹配分析
J Immigr Minor Health. 2018 Aug;20(4):799-808. doi: 10.1007/s10903-017-0570-z.
9
'We both just wanted to be normal parents': a qualitative study of the experience of maternity care for women with learning disability.“我们都只想做普通父母”:一项关于学习障碍女性孕产护理经历的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 24;7(3):e015526. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015526.
10
Midwifery continuity of carer in an area of high socio-economic disadvantage in London: A retrospective analysis of Albany Midwifery Practice outcomes using routine data (1997-2009).伦敦社会经济高度不利地区的助产士连续性照护:利用常规数据对奥尔巴尼助产实践结果进行的回顾性分析(1997 - 2009年)
Midwifery. 2017 May;48:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Feb 27.