• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2019 年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会系统性红斑狼疮分类标准。

2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

机构信息

University Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;71(9):1400-1412. doi: 10.1002/art.40930. Epub 2019 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1002/art.40930
PMID:31385462
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6827566/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop new classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) jointly supported by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR).

METHODS

This international initiative had four phases. 1) Evaluation of antinuclear antibody (ANA) as an entry criterion through systematic review and meta-regression of the literature and criteria generation through an international Delphi exercise, an early patient cohort, and a patient survey. 2) Criteria reduction by Delphi and nominal group technique exercises. 3) Criteria definition and weighting based on criterion performance and on results of a multi-criteria decision analysis. 4) Refinement of weights and threshold scores in a new derivation cohort of 1,001 subjects and validation compared with previous criteria in a new validation cohort of 1,270 subjects.

RESULTS

The 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SLE include positive ANA at least once as obligatory entry criterion; followed by additive weighted criteria grouped in 7 clinical (constitutional, hematologic, neuropsychiatric, mucocutaneous, serosal, musculoskeletal, renal) and 3 immunologic (antiphospholipid antibodies, complement proteins, SLE-specific antibodies) domains, and weighted from 2 to 10. Patients accumulating ≥10 points are classified. In the validation cohort, the new criteria had a sensitivity of 96.1% and specificity of 93.4%, compared with 82.8% sensitivity and 93.4% specificity of the ACR 1997 and 96.7% sensitivity and 83.7% specificity of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics 2012 criteria.

CONCLUSION

These new classification criteria were developed using rigorous methodology with multidisciplinary and international input, and have excellent sensitivity and specificity. Use of ANA entry criterion, hierarchically clustered, and weighted criteria reflects current thinking about SLE and provides an improved foundation for SLE research.

摘要

目的

由欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)和美国风湿病学会(ACR)共同制定新的系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)分类标准。

方法

这项国际倡议分为四个阶段。1)通过系统评价和文献荟萃分析以及国际德尔菲专家咨询、早期患者队列和患者调查,评估抗核抗体(ANA)作为纳入标准的作用,并生成分类标准。2)通过德尔菲法和名义群体技术进行标准简化。3)根据标准性能和多准则决策分析的结果,定义和加权标准。4)在 1001 例新推导队列中进一步完善权重和阈值评分,并与 1270 例新验证队列中的以前标准进行验证比较。

结果

2019 年 EULAR/ACR SLE 分类标准包括至少一次阳性 ANA 作为强制性纳入标准;随后是附加加权标准,分为 7 个临床(全身、血液、神经精神、黏膜皮肤、浆膜、肌肉骨骼、肾脏)和 3 个免疫学(抗磷脂抗体、补体蛋白、SLE 特异性抗体)域,权重为 2 到 10。累积≥10 分的患者可被分类。在验证队列中,新的标准具有 96.1%的敏感性和 93.4%的特异性,而 ACR 1997 标准的敏感性为 82.8%,特异性为 93.4%,SLE 国际协作临床 2012 标准的敏感性为 96.7%,特异性为 83.7%。

结论

这些新的分类标准是使用多学科和国际投入的严格方法制定的,具有优异的敏感性和特异性。使用 ANA 纳入标准、分层聚类和加权标准反映了目前对 SLE 的认识,为 SLE 研究提供了更好的基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6fb/6827566/5d67c8787f1f/nihms-1029532-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6fb/6827566/ce841e2b03ae/nihms-1029532-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6fb/6827566/5d67c8787f1f/nihms-1029532-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6fb/6827566/ce841e2b03ae/nihms-1029532-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6fb/6827566/5d67c8787f1f/nihms-1029532-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.2019 年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会系统性红斑狼疮分类标准。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;71(9):1400-1412. doi: 10.1002/art.40930. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
2
2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus.2019 年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会系统性红斑狼疮分类标准。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Sep;78(9):1151-1159. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214819. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
3
A comparison of the performance of the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology criteria and the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics criteria with the 1997 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematous in new-onset Chinese patients.2019年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会标准与2012年系统性红斑狼疮国际协作临床组标准在初发中国患者中与1997年美国风湿病学会系统性红斑狼疮分类标准的性能比较。
Lupus. 2020 May;29(6):617-624. doi: 10.1177/0961203320914356. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
4
New classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus.系统性红斑狼疮的新分类标准。
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2020 Nov;32(6):590-596. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000740.
5
Evaluation of the European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology-2019 classification criteria in patients with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a single-center retrospective study.评估欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会 2019 年儿童发病系统性红斑狼疮分类标准:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Aug;41(8):2483-2489. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06138-7. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
6
Developing and Refining New Candidate Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Classification: An International Collaboration.制定和完善系统性红斑狼疮分类的新候选标准:国际协作。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Apr;70(4):571-581. doi: 10.1002/acr.23317. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
7
European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) SLE classification criteria item performance.欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)/美国风湿病学会(ACR)SLE 分类标准项目表现。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jun;80(6):775-781. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219373. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
8
Comparison of systemic lupus international collaborating clinics 2012 classification criteria and European league against rheumatism/American college of rheumatology 2019 classification criteria for early detection of childhood onset systemic lupus erythematosus (multi-center study).比较系统性红斑狼疮国际协作组 2012 分类标准与欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会 2019 年儿童发病系统性红斑狼疮早期检测分类标准(多中心研究)。
Lupus. 2024 May;33(6):629-637. doi: 10.1177/09612033241240830. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
9
Application of the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology systemic lupus erythematosus classification criteria in clinical practice: a single center experience.2019 年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会系统性红斑狼疮分类标准在临床实践中的应用:单中心经验。
Lupus. 2020 Apr;29(4):421-425. doi: 10.1177/0961203320908939. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
10
EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SLE.EULAR/ACR 系统性红斑狼疮分类标准。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Dec;49(3S):S14-S17. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.09.009.

引用本文的文献

1
PTPN22-CD45 dual phosphatase retrograde feedback enhances TCR signaling and autoimmunity.PTPN22-CD45双磷酸酶逆行反馈增强TCR信号传导和自身免疫。
Sci Adv. 2025 Sep 5;11(36):eadw2568. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adw2568.
2
Clinical spectrum of rhupus syndrome: a series of eight cases.类风湿性狼疮综合征的临床谱:八例系列报道
Rheumatol Int. 2025 Sep 4;45(9):218. doi: 10.1007/s00296-025-05979-0.
3
Pericardial tamponade in pregnancy due to undiagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus: a case report.妊娠期间因未确诊的系统性红斑狼疮导致的心包填塞:一例病例报告

本文引用的文献

1
Associations Between Classification Criteria Items in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.红斑狼疮分类标准项目之间的关联。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Dec;72(12):1820-1826. doi: 10.1002/acr.24078. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
2
Cytokine Profiles in Autoantibody Defined Subgroups of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.自身抗体定义的系统性红斑狼疮亚群中的细胞因子谱。
J Proteome Res. 2019 Mar 1;18(3):1208-1217. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00811. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
3
Multicriteria decision analysis process to develop new classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus.
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2025 Aug 13;9(9):ytaf388. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytaf388. eCollection 2025 Sep.
4
[Lupus erythematosus].[红斑狼疮]
Dermatologie (Heidelb). 2025 Sep 1. doi: 10.1007/s00105-025-05554-5.
5
Anti-PS IgG Immune Complexes Impair Macrophage Phagocytosis in SLE via LOX-Dependent Oxidative Stress.抗磷脂酰丝氨酸IgG免疫复合物通过赖氨氧化酶依赖性氧化应激损害系统性红斑狼疮患者巨噬细胞的吞噬作用。
J Inflamm Res. 2025 Aug 22;18:11521-11538. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S527859. eCollection 2025.
6
Autoantibodies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Diagnostic and Pathogenic Insights.系统性红斑狼疮中的自身抗体:诊断与发病机制见解
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 12;14(16):5714. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165714.
7
Anifrolumab for Nonsystemic Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: Clinical Experience, Immunologic Insights, and Review of the Literature.阿尼鲁单抗治疗非系统性皮肤红斑狼疮:临床经验、免疫学见解及文献综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 11;14(16):5683. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165683.
8
Risk factors in systemic lupus erythematosus-associated Sjögren's syndrome: multicenter case-control studies and systematic review.系统性红斑狼疮相关干燥综合征的危险因素:多中心病例对照研究及系统评价
Clin Rheumatol. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1007/s10067-025-07611-9.
9
Investigating cytotoxic and inflammatory human IL-7 receptor low effector memory CD8 T cells in lupus.研究狼疮中具有细胞毒性和炎症性的人类白细胞介素-7受体低表达效应记忆性CD8 T细胞。
EBioMedicine. 2025 Aug 25;119:105898. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105898.
10
Development of a Theory-Based mHealth App for Fatigue Management in Lupus: Human-Centered Design Approach.基于理论的狼疮疲劳管理移动健康应用程序的开发:以人为本的设计方法。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 26;9:e75399. doi: 10.2196/75399.
多准则决策分析过程制定系统性红斑狼疮的新分类标准。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 May;78(5):634-640. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214685. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
4
Use of Consensus Methodology to Determine Candidate Items for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Classification Criteria.应用共识方法确定系统性红斑狼疮分类标准的候选条目。
J Rheumatol. 2019 Jul;46(7):721-726. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.180478. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
5
Brief Report: How Do Patients With Newly Diagnosed Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Present? A Multicenter Cohort of Early Systemic Lupus Erythematosus to Inform the Development of New Classification Criteria.简要报告:新诊断的系统性红斑狼疮患者的表现如何?一个多中心的早期系统性红斑狼疮队列研究为新的分类标准的制定提供信息。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Jan;71(1):91-98. doi: 10.1002/art.40674. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
6
Early symptoms of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) recalled by 339 SLE patients.339名系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者回忆起的系统性红斑狼疮早期症状。
Lupus. 2018 Aug;27(9):1431-1436. doi: 10.1177/0961203318776093. Epub 2018 May 17.
7
The ratio of erythrocyte sedimentation rate to C-reactive protein is useful in distinguishing infection from flare in systemic lupus erythematosus patients presenting with fever.红细胞沉降率与C反应蛋白的比值,对于鉴别出现发热症状的系统性红斑狼疮患者的感染与病情复发很有用。
Lupus. 2018 Jun;27(7):1123-1129. doi: 10.1177/0961203318763732. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
8
Multicenter Delphi Exercise to Identify Important Key Items for Classifying Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.多中心德尔菲法确定红斑狼疮分类的重要关键项目
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Oct;70(10):1488-1494. doi: 10.1002/acr.23503. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
9
Developing and Refining New Candidate Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Classification: An International Collaboration.制定和完善系统性红斑狼疮分类的新候选标准:国际协作。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Apr;70(4):571-581. doi: 10.1002/acr.23317. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
10
Performance of Antinuclear Antibodies for Classifying Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Regression of Diagnostic Data.抗核抗体对系统性红斑狼疮分类的性能:系统文献回顾和诊断数据的荟萃回归分析。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Mar;70(3):428-438. doi: 10.1002/acr.23292. Epub 2018 Jan 30.