• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Developing and Refining New Candidate Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Classification: An International Collaboration.制定和完善系统性红斑狼疮分类的新候选标准:国际协作。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Apr;70(4):571-581. doi: 10.1002/acr.23317. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
2
2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.2019 年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会系统性红斑狼疮分类标准。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;71(9):1400-1412. doi: 10.1002/art.40930. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
3
Use of Consensus Methodology to Determine Candidate Items for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Classification Criteria.应用共识方法确定系统性红斑狼疮分类标准的候选条目。
J Rheumatol. 2019 Jul;46(7):721-726. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.180478. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
4
2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus.2019 年欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会系统性红斑狼疮分类标准。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Sep;78(9):1151-1159. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214819. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
5
Multicriteria decision analysis process to develop new classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus.多准则决策分析过程制定系统性红斑狼疮的新分类标准。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 May;78(5):634-640. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214685. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
6
ANA as an entry criterion for the classification of SLE.抗核抗体作为 SLE 分类的纳入标准。
Autoimmun Rev. 2019 Dec;18(12):102400. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2019.102400. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
7
Performance of Antinuclear Antibodies for Classifying Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Regression of Diagnostic Data.抗核抗体对系统性红斑狼疮分类的性能:系统文献回顾和诊断数据的荟萃回归分析。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Mar;70(3):428-438. doi: 10.1002/acr.23292. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
8
Preliminary criteria for global flares in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.儿童发病系统性红斑狼疮全球 flares 的初步标准。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Sep;63(9):1213-23. doi: 10.1002/acr.20507.
9
Development of a New International Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria Phase I/II Report: Generation and Reduction of Candidate Criteria.新型国际抗磷脂综合征分类标准制定项目第一/二期报告:候选标准的生成与删减
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021 Oct;73(10):1490-1501. doi: 10.1002/acr.24520. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
10
Multicenter Delphi Exercise to Identify Important Key Items for Classifying Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.多中心德尔菲法确定红斑狼疮分类的重要关键项目
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Oct;70(10):1488-1494. doi: 10.1002/acr.23503. Epub 2018 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
IL-4 alters TLR7-induced B cell developmental program in lupus.白细胞介素-4改变狼疮中Toll样受体7诱导的B细胞发育程序。
Clin Immunol. 2025 Jun;275:110472. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2025.110472. Epub 2025 Mar 9.
2
Evaluation of Progression From Preclinical to Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Disease: Novel Use of the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Classification Criteria as an Outcome Measure.从临床前阶段进展至系统性自身免疫性风湿病的评估:欧洲风湿病协会联盟/美国风湿病学会系统性红斑狼疮分类标准作为一项结局指标的新应用
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2024 Dec;6(12):871-877. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11723. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
3
Update and clinical management of anti-DNA auto-antibodies.抗DNA自身抗体的更新与临床管理
Adv Lab Med. 2021 Apr 26;2(3):313-331. doi: 10.1515/almed-2021-0008. eCollection 2021 Aug.
4
Lupus Nephritis: The Significant Contribution of Electron Microscopy.狼疮性肾炎:电子显微镜的重要贡献。
Glomerular Dis. 2021 Jul 15;1(4):180-204. doi: 10.1159/000516790. eCollection 2021 Oct.
5
IL-4-Induced Quiescence of Resting Naive B Cells Is Disrupted in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.IL-4 诱导的静止初始 B 细胞在系统性红斑狼疮中被破坏。
J Immunol. 2022 Oct 15;209(8):1513-1522. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2200409. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
6
Anti-dsDNA antibodies in the classification criteria of systemic lupus erythematosus.系统性红斑狼疮分类标准中的抗双链DNA抗体
J Transl Autoimmun. 2021 Dec 28;5:100139. doi: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2021.100139. eCollection 2022.
7
Retinal thickness and microvascular alterations in the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus: a new approach.视网膜厚度和微血管改变在系统性红斑狼疮诊断中的应用:一种新方法。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Jan;12(1):823-837. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-359.
8
An Epigenetics-Based Hypothesis of Autoantigen Development in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.基于表观遗传学的系统性红斑狼疮自身抗原产生假说。
Epigenomes. 2020 Apr 23;4(2):6. doi: 10.3390/epigenomes4020006.
9
ANA positivity and complement level in pleural fluid are potential diagnostic markers in discriminating lupus pleuritis from pleural effusion of other aetiologies.胸腔积液中的 ANA 阳性和补体水平是鉴别狼疮性胸膜炎与其他病因胸腔积液的潜在诊断标志物。
Lupus Sci Med. 2021 Nov;8(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2021-000562.
10
Evaluation of structured data from electronic health records to identify clinical classification criteria attributes for systemic lupus erythematosus.从电子健康记录中评估结构化数据,以确定红斑狼疮的临床分类标准属性。
Lupus Sci Med. 2021 Apr;8(1). doi: 10.1136/lupus-2021-000488.

本文引用的文献

1
Multicenter Delphi Exercise to Identify Important Key Items for Classifying Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.多中心德尔菲法确定红斑狼疮分类的重要关键项目
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Oct;70(10):1488-1494. doi: 10.1002/acr.23503. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
2
Development of classification criteria for discoid lupus erythematosus: Results of a Delphi exercise.盘状红斑狼疮分类标准的制定:德尔菲法研究结果。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Aug;77(2):261-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.02.030. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
3
Performance of Antinuclear Antibodies for Classifying Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Regression of Diagnostic Data.抗核抗体对系统性红斑狼疮分类的性能:系统文献回顾和诊断数据的荟萃回归分析。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Mar;70(3):428-438. doi: 10.1002/acr.23292. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
4
Clinical and Serologic Features in Patients With Incomplete Lupus Classification Versus Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients and Controls.不完全狼疮分类患者与系统性红斑狼疮患者及对照组的临床和血清学特征
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Dec;69(12):1780-1788. doi: 10.1002/acr.23201. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
5
Discerning Risk of Disease Transition in Relatives of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients Utilizing Soluble Mediators and Clinical Features.利用可溶性介质和临床特征辨别系统性红斑狼疮患者亲属的疾病转归风险。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Mar;69(3):630-642. doi: 10.1002/art.40004.
6
Dysregulation of innate and adaptive serum mediators precedes systemic lupus erythematosus classification and improves prognostic accuracy of autoantibodies.先天性和适应性血清介质失调先于系统性红斑狼疮的分类,并提高自身抗体的预后准确性。
J Autoimmun. 2016 Nov;74:182-193. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
7
Toward new criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus-a standpoint.迈向系统性红斑狼疮的新诊断标准——一种观点。
Lupus. 2016 Jul;25(8):805-11. doi: 10.1177/0961203316644338.
8
2015 Gout Classification Criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative.2015 年痛风分类标准:美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿病联盟合作倡议。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Oct;67(10):2557-68. doi: 10.1002/art.39254.
9
Predictors of long-term renal outcome in lupus nephritis trials: lessons learned from the Euro-Lupus Nephritis cohort.狼疮肾炎试验中长期肾脏结局的预测因素:来自 Euro-Lupus Nephritis 队列的经验教训。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 May;67(5):1305-13. doi: 10.1002/art.39026.
10
Diagnostic value of serum complement C3 and C4 levels in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.血清补体C3和C4水平在中国系统性红斑狼疮患者中的诊断价值
Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Mar;34(3):471-7. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2843-4. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

制定和完善系统性红斑狼疮分类的新候选标准:国际协作。

Developing and Refining New Candidate Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Classification: An International Collaboration.

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Toronto Western Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Apr;70(4):571-581. doi: 10.1002/acr.23317. Epub 2018 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1002/acr.23317
PMID:28692774
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5996759/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To define candidate criteria within multiphase development of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification criteria, jointly supported by the American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism. Prior steps included item generation and reduction by Delphi exercise, further narrowed to 21 items in a nominal group technique exercise. Our objectives were to apply an evidence-based approach to the 21 candidate criteria, and to develop hierarchical organization of criteria within domains.

METHODS

A literature review identified the sensitivity and specificity of the 21 candidate criteria. Data on the performance of antinuclear antibody (ANA) as an entry criterion and operating characteristics of the candidate criteria in early SLE patients were evaluated. Candidate criteria were hierarchically organized into clinical and immunologic domains, and definitions were refined in an iterative process.

RESULTS

Based on the data, consensus was reached to use a positive ANA of ≥1:80 titer (HEp-2 cells immunofluorescence) as an entry criterion and to have 7 clinical and 3 immunologic domains, with hierarchical organization of criteria within domains. Definitions of the candidate criteria were specified.

CONCLUSION

Using a data-driven process, consensus was reached on new, refined criteria definitions and organization based on operating characteristics. This work will be followed by a multicriteria decision analysis exercise to weight criteria and to identify a threshold score for classification on a continuous probability scale.

摘要

目的

为了定义系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)分类标准多阶段开发中的候选标准,该标准得到了美国风湿病学会和欧洲抗风湿病联盟的共同支持。之前的步骤包括德尔菲法练习进行项目生成和简化,进一步在名义群体技术练习中缩小到 21 项。我们的目标是对 21 项候选标准应用循证方法,并在各个领域内对标准进行分层组织。

方法

文献综述确定了 21 项候选标准的敏感性和特异性。评估了抗核抗体(ANA)作为入选标准的性能数据,以及候选标准在早期 SLE 患者中的操作特征。候选标准按照临床和免疫学领域进行分层组织,并在迭代过程中对定义进行细化。

结果

根据这些数据,达成了共识,即使用阳性 ANA 滴度≥1:80(HEp-2 细胞免疫荧光)作为入选标准,并设置 7 个临床和 3 个免疫学领域,在各个领域内对标准进行分层组织。候选标准的定义也进行了明确。

结论

通过数据驱动的过程,根据操作特征,就新的、经过精炼的标准定义和组织达成了共识。接下来将进行多标准决策分析练习,对标准进行加权,并确定连续概率尺度上的分类阈值分数。