Aging & Cognition Research Group, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany.
Institute of Psychology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Neuroimage. 2019 Nov 15;202:116074. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116074. Epub 2019 Aug 3.
Landmarks and path integration cues are two important sources of spatial information for navigation. For example, both can be used to compute positional information, which, in rodents, has been related to computations in the entorhinal cortex. In humans, however, if and how the entorhinal cortex supports landmark-based navigation and path integration is poorly understood. To address this important question, we developed a novel spatial navigation task in which participants learned a target location and judged relative positions of test locations in relation to the target. Landmarks and path integration cues were dissociated, and their reliability levels were manipulated. Using fMRI adaptation, we investigated whether spatial distances among the test locations were encoded in the BOLD responses, separately for landmarks and self-motion cues. The results showed that the anterior-lateral entorhinal cortex adapted to the distance between successively visited test locations when landmarks were used for localization, meaning that its activation decreased as the distance between the currently occupied location and the preceding location decreased. In contrast, the posterior-medial entorhinal cortex adapted to between-location distance when path integration cues were used for localization. In addition, along with the hippocampus and the precuneus, both entorhinal subregions showed stronger activation in correct trials than incorrect trials, regardless of cue type and reliability level. Together, these findings suggest that subdivisions of entorhinal cortex encode fine-grained spatial information for different spatial cues, which provides important insights into how the entorhinal cortex supports different modes of spatial navigation.
地标和路径整合线索是导航的两个重要空间信息来源。例如,两者都可用于计算位置信息,而在啮齿动物中,这些位置信息与内嗅皮层的计算有关。然而,在人类中,内嗅皮层是否以及如何支持基于地标和路径整合的导航仍然知之甚少。为了解决这个重要的问题,我们开发了一种新的空间导航任务,参与者在该任务中学习目标位置,并判断测试位置相对于目标的相对位置。我们分离了地标和路径整合线索,并操纵了它们的可靠性水平。使用 fMRI 适应,我们研究了在使用地标进行定位时,测试位置之间的空间距离是否在 BOLD 反应中单独编码,以及在使用自身运动线索进行定位时是否也如此。结果表明,当使用地标进行定位时,前外侧内嗅皮层适应了连续访问的测试位置之间的距离,这意味着随着当前位置与前一个位置之间的距离减小,其激活程度降低。相比之下,当使用路径整合线索进行定位时,后内侧内嗅皮层适应了位置之间的距离。此外,与海马体和后扣带回一起,两个内嗅皮层亚区在正确试次中的激活强度均强于错误试次,而与线索类型和可靠性水平无关。总之,这些发现表明,内嗅皮层的细分区域为不同的空间线索编码了精细的空间信息,这为内嗅皮层如何支持不同的空间导航模式提供了重要的见解。