• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痴呆症患者的安乐死及其他临终问题

Euthanasia and other end of life in patients suffering from dementia.

作者信息

Cipriani Gabriele, Di Fiorino Mario

机构信息

Neurology Unit, Versilia Hospital, via Aurelia, 55043 Lido di Camaiore, Lucca (Lu), Italy; Psychiatry Unit, Versilia Hospital, via Aurelia, 55043 Lido di Camaiore, Lucca (Lu), Italy.

Psychiatry Unit, Versilia Hospital, via Aurelia, 55043 Lido di Camaiore, Lucca (Lu), Italy.

出版信息

Leg Med (Tokyo). 2019 Sep;40:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.legalmed.2019.07.007
PMID:31387014
Abstract

Medicine aims to relieve patient suffering and cure illness. To relieve suffering is the heart of what doctors do. However, respect for individual autonomy and self-determination are fundamental principles in Western medical ethics and decision-making, often expressed as a desire for control over the timing and manner of death. Patients who become demented often formulate advance euthanasia and assisted suicide directives. Dealing with such request is quite complex because of the specific medical and conflicting ethical questions they raise. Some specific medical and ethical issues arise regarding these substantive requirements when evaluating the euthanasia request of a person suffering from dementia. In jurisdictions that allow euthanasia, the most fundamental prerequisite for a person to make autonomous decisions is capacity. Whether anyone with moderate or severe dementia, and even some with mild dementia, could be deemed to be competent by these criteria is debatable, but during the course of their disease people with dementia sooner or later lose their capacity to make self-determined decisions.

摘要

医学旨在减轻患者痛苦并治愈疾病。减轻痛苦是医生工作的核心。然而,尊重个人自主权和自决权是西方医学伦理和决策中的基本原则,这通常表现为对掌控死亡时间和方式的渴望。患痴呆症的患者常常会制定预先的安乐死和协助自杀指令。处理这类请求相当复杂,因为它们引发了特定的医学问题和相互冲突的伦理问题。在评估痴呆症患者的安乐死请求时,就这些实质性要求会出现一些特定的医学和伦理问题。在允许安乐死的司法管辖区,一个人做出自主决定的最基本前提是有行为能力。按照这些标准,是否任何患有中度或重度痴呆症的人,甚至一些轻度痴呆症患者都能被视为有行为能力是有争议的,但在患病过程中,痴呆症患者迟早会失去做出自主决定的能力。

相似文献

1
Euthanasia and other end of life in patients suffering from dementia.痴呆症患者的安乐死及其他临终问题
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2019 Sep;40:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
2
The role of advance euthanasia directives as an aid to communication and shared decision-making in dementia.预先安乐死指令在痴呆症患者沟通与共同决策中的作用。
J Med Ethics. 2009 Feb;35(2):100-3. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.024109.
3
Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide of Persons With Dementia in the Netherlands.荷兰痴呆症患者的安乐死和协助自杀。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;28(4):466-477. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.08.015. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
4
Advance directives, dementia, and physician-assisted death.预先指示、痴呆症和医师协助死亡。
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Summer;41(2):484-500. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12057.
5
[Physician-assisted suicide and advance care planning--ethical considerations on the autonomy of dementia patients at their end of life].[医生协助自杀与预先护理计划——关于痴呆症患者临终时自主权的伦理考量]
Psychiatr Prax. 2014 Oct;41(7):385-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1370206. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
6
Public opinion regarding end-of-life decisions: influence of prognosis, practice and process.公众对临终决策的看法:预后、实践与过程的影响
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Dec;41(11):1517-21. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00057-e.
7
The ethics of euthanasia in dementia: A qualitative content analysis of case summaries (2012-2020).痴呆患者安乐死的伦理问题:案例摘要的定性内容分析(2012-2020 年)。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Jun;70(6):1704-1716. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17707. Epub 2022 Feb 20.
8
Ethics of end-of-life decisions in cases of dementia: views of the Royal Dutch Medical Association with some critical comments.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1999 Apr-Jun;13(2):91-5. doi: 10.1097/00002093-199904000-00006.
9
End-of-life, euthanasia, and assisted suicide: An update on the situation in France.临终关怀、安乐死与协助自杀:法国现状更新
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2016 Dec;172(12):719-724. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
10
Bioethical implications of end-of-life decision-making in patients with dementia: a tale of two societies.痴呆患者临终决策的生物伦理影响:两个社会的故事
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2020 May;38(1):49-67. doi: 10.1007/s40592-020-00112-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Management in severe dementia: recommendations of the Scientific Department of Cognitive Neurology and Aging of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology.重度痴呆的管理:巴西神经科学院认知神经学与衰老科学部的建议
Dement Neuropsychol. 2022 Nov 28;16(3 Suppl 1):101-120. doi: 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2022-S107PT. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Finished with Life Anyway and Then Stigmatized for Attempting Suicide-An Overview.无论如何结束生命,然后因自杀未遂而被污名化——概述
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 17;10(11):2303. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112303.
3
Euthanasia in Dementia: A Narrative Review of Legislation and Practices in the Netherlands and Belgium.
痴呆症中的安乐死:荷兰和比利时立法与实践的叙述性综述
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 2;13:857131. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.857131. eCollection 2022.
4
The ethics of euthanasia in dementia: A qualitative content analysis of case summaries (2012-2020).痴呆患者安乐死的伦理问题:案例摘要的定性内容分析(2012-2020 年)。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Jun;70(6):1704-1716. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17707. Epub 2022 Feb 20.
5
Physician-Assisted Suicide in Dementia: Paradoxes, Pitfalls and the Need for Prudence.痴呆症中的医生协助自杀:悖论、陷阱与审慎之需
Front Sociol. 2021 Dec 22;6:815233. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.815233. eCollection 2021.
6
European Countries' Different Legal Orientation About End-of-Life Issues in Patients Affected With Neurological/Psychiatric Diseases: Does Italian Law n.219/2017 Provide Adequate Options for This Fragile Category of Patients?欧洲国家对神经/精神疾病患者临终问题的不同法律倾向:意大利第219/2017号法律是否为这类脆弱的患者提供了充分的选择?
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 24;12:675706. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.675706. eCollection 2021.
7
What passive euthanasia is.什么是被动安乐死。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 May 14;21(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00481-7.