• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进结直肠癌筛查的经济激励措施:一项纵向随机对照试验。

Financial Incentives to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Longitudinal Randomized Control Trial.

机构信息

Rady School of Management, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Moncrief Cancer Institute, Fort Worth, Texas.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Nov;28(11):1902-1908. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0039. Epub 2019 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0039
PMID:31387970
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7008465/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Financial incentives may improve health behaviors. We tested the impact of offering financial incentives for mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) completion annually for 3 years.

METHODS

Patients, ages 50 to 64 years, not up-to-date with screening were randomized to receive either a mailed FIT outreach ( = 6,565), outreach plus $5 ( = 1,000), or $10 ( = 1,000) incentive for completion. Patients who completed the test were reinvited using the same incentive the following year, for 3 years. In year 4, patients who returned the kit in all preceding 3 years were reinvited without incentives. Primary outcome was FIT completion among patients offered any incentive versus outreach alone each year. Secondary outcomes were FIT completion for groups offered $5 versus outreach alone, $10 versus outreach alone, and $5 versus $10.

RESULTS

Year 1 FIT completion was 36.9% with incentives versus 36.2% outreach alone ( = 0.59) and was not statistically different for $10 (34.6%; = 0.31) or $5 (39.2%; = 0.070) versus outreach alone. Year 2 completion was 61.6% with incentives versus 60.8% outreach alone ( = 0.75) and not statistically different for $10 or $5 versus outreach alone. Year 3 completion was 79.4% with incentives versus 74.8% outreach alone ( = 0.080), and was higher for $10 (82.4%) versus outreach alone ( = 0.033), but not for $5 versus outreach alone. Completion was similar across conditions in year 4 (no incentives).

CONCLUSIONS

Offering small incentives did not increase FIT completion relative to standard outreach.

IMPACT

This was the first longitudinal study testing the impact of repeated financial incentives, and their withdrawal, on FIT completion.

摘要

背景

经济激励可能改善健康行为。我们测试了提供经济激励以促进邮寄粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)完成的效果,连续 3 年每年提供一次。

方法

年龄在 50 至 64 岁之间、未及时进行筛查的患者被随机分配到接受邮寄 FIT 外展(=6565)、外展加 5 美元(=1000)或 10 美元(=1000)激励以完成测试。完成测试的患者在次年使用相同的激励措施再次受邀,为期 3 年。在第 4 年,在前 3 年返回试剂盒的患者没有激励措施再次受邀。主要结果是每年提供任何激励措施的患者与单独外展相比完成 FIT 的情况。次要结果是与单独外展相比,提供 5 美元、10 美元的组完成 FIT 的情况,以及提供 5 美元与 10 美元的组完成 FIT 的情况。

结果

第 1 年的 FIT 完成率为 36.9%,有激励措施的患者与单独外展的患者相比(=0.59),差异无统计学意义,而 10 美元(34.6%;=0.31)或 5 美元(39.2%;=0.070)与单独外展的患者相比,差异也无统计学意义。第 2 年的完成率为 61.6%,有激励措施的患者与单独外展的患者相比(=0.75),差异也无统计学意义,而 10 美元或 5 美元与单独外展的患者相比,差异也无统计学意义。第 3 年的完成率为 79.4%,有激励措施的患者与单独外展的患者相比(=0.080),差异有统计学意义,而 10 美元(82.4%)与单独外展的患者相比(=0.033),差异有统计学意义,但 5 美元与单独外展的患者相比,差异无统计学意义。第 4 年(无激励措施)各条件下的完成情况相似。

结论

与标准外展相比,提供小额激励并不能提高 FIT 完成率。

影响

这是第一项测试重复经济激励及其撤销对 FIT 完成影响的纵向研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f3b/7008465/6eb644ac0485/nihms-1536806-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f3b/7008465/d37624a7e2c2/nihms-1536806-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f3b/7008465/6eb644ac0485/nihms-1536806-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f3b/7008465/d37624a7e2c2/nihms-1536806-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f3b/7008465/6eb644ac0485/nihms-1536806-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Financial Incentives to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Longitudinal Randomized Control Trial.促进结直肠癌筛查的经济激励措施:一项纵向随机对照试验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Nov;28(11):1902-1908. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0039. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
2
Effect of Financial Incentives on Patient Use of Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests: A Randomized Clinical Trial.经济激励对邮寄结直肠癌筛查试验患者使用的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e191156. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1156.
3
Financial Incentives for Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial.促进结直肠癌筛查的经济激励措施:一项随机对照有效性试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov;111(11):1630-1636. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.286. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
4
Effect of Colonoscopy Outreach vs Fecal Immunochemical Test Outreach on Colorectal Cancer Screening Completion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.结肠镜检查外展与粪便免疫化学检测外展对结直肠癌筛查完成率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2017 Sep 5;318(9):806-815. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11389.
5
Addition of Financial Incentives to Mailed Outreach for Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.邮寄外展促进结直肠癌筛查中加入经济激励措施的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2122581. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.22581.
6
Effectiveness and Cost of Organized Outreach for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.有组织的大肠癌筛查外展服务的效果和成本:一项随机对照试验。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Mar 1;112(3):305-313. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz110.
7
Financial Incentives to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake and Decrease Disparities: A Randomized Clinical Trial.经济激励措施对提高结直肠癌筛查参与度和减少差异的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jul 3;2(7):e196570. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6570.
8
Direct-to-member mailed colorectal cancer screening outreach for Medicaid and Medicare enrollees: Implementation and effectiveness outcomes from the BeneFIT study.针对医疗补助计划和医疗保险参保人的直接向成员邮寄的结直肠癌筛查外展活动:BeneFIT 研究的实施和效果结果。
Cancer. 2020 Feb 1;126(3):540-548. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32567. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
9
Outreach invitations for FIT and colonoscopy improve colorectal cancer screening rates: A randomized controlled trial in a safety-net health system.粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)和结肠镜检查的外展邀请可提高结直肠癌筛查率:一项在安全网医疗系统中的随机对照试验。
Cancer. 2016 Feb 1;122(3):456-63. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29770. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
10
The effect of mailed outreach on FIT completion among patients aged 45-50 in a safety net healthcare system.在一个医疗保障体系中,邮寄外展对 45-50 岁患者完成粪便免疫化学检测的影响。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Oct;35(10):1311-1317. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01889-x. Epub 2024 Jun 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating digital nudge interventions for the promotion of cancer screening behavior: a systematic review and meta-analysis.评估促进癌症筛查行为的数字助推干预措施:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2025 Apr 14;23(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04028-8.
2
Evaluating colonoscopy quality by performing provider type.通过执行提供者类型来评估结肠镜检查质量。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Aug 1;116(8):1264-1269. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae080.
3
Are behavioral economics interventions effective in increasing colorectal cancer screening uptake: A systematic review of evidence and meta-analysis?行为经济学干预措施在提高结直肠癌筛查参与度方面是否有效:系统评价和荟萃分析证据?
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 5;19(2):e0290424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290424. eCollection 2024.
4
Effectiveness of behavioural economics-based interventions to improve colorectal cancer screening participation: A rapid systematic review of randomised controlled trials.基于行为经济学的干预措施对提高结直肠癌筛查参与率的有效性:随机对照试验的快速系统评价
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Mar 3;26:101747. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101747. eCollection 2022 Apr.
5
Addition of Financial Incentives to Mailed Outreach for Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.邮寄外展促进结直肠癌筛查中加入经济激励措施的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2122581. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.22581.
6
The effect of deadlines on cancer screening completion: a randomized controlled trial.截止日期对癌症筛查完成情况的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 6;11(1):13876. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93334-1.
7
Mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach for colorectal cancer screening: Summary of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored Summit.邮寄粪便免疫化学试验进行结直肠癌筛查:疾病预防控制中心主办的峰会总结。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jul;70(4):283-298. doi: 10.3322/caac.21615. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
8
What Multilevel Interventions Do We Need to Increase the Colorectal Cancer Screening Rate to 80%?我们需要采取哪些多层次干预措施才能将结直肠癌筛查率提高到 80%?
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Apr;19(4):633-645. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.12.016. Epub 2019 Dec 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Engaging Beneficiaries In Medicaid Programs That Incentivize Health-Promoting Behaviors.让参保人参与鼓励促进健康行为的医疗补助计划。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Mar;38(3):431-439. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05427.
2
Cancer statistics, 2019.癌症统计数据,2019 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
3
Effects of Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening on Cancer Incidence and Mortality in a Large Community-Based Population.基于大型社区人群的结直肠癌筛查对癌症发病率和死亡率的影响。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Nov;155(5):1383-1391.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.017. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
4
Effect of Financial Incentives on Glucose Monitoring Adherence and Glycemic Control Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.经济激励对1型糖尿病青少年及青年成人血糖监测依从性和血糖控制的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Dec 1;171(12):1176-1183. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3233.
5
Active Choice and Financial Incentives to Increase Rates of Screening Colonoscopy-A Randomized Controlled Trial.增加结肠镜筛查率的主动选择和经济激励措施——一项随机对照试验
Gastroenterology. 2017 Nov;153(5):1227-1229.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.015. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
6
Financial Incentives for Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial.促进结直肠癌筛查的经济激励措施:一项随机对照有效性试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov;111(11):1630-1636. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.286. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
7
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5989.
8
Fecal Immunochemical Test Program Performance Over 4 Rounds of Annual Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study.四轮年度筛查中粪便免疫化学检测项目的表现:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Apr 5;164(7):456-63. doi: 10.7326/M15-0983. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
9
Outreach invitations for FIT and colonoscopy improve colorectal cancer screening rates: A randomized controlled trial in a safety-net health system.粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)和结肠镜检查的外展邀请可提高结直肠癌筛查率:一项在安全网医疗系统中的随机对照试验。
Cancer. 2016 Feb 1;122(3):456-63. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29770. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
10
Randomized trial of four financial-incentive programs for smoking cessation.四项戒烟经济激励方案的随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 28;372(22):2108-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414293. Epub 2015 May 13.