Maurya Rajkumar, Jayan B, Mitra Rajat, Nakra Oonit, Kamat Uday
Assistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Army Dental Centre (R & R), Delhi, India.
Commandant & Dental Adviser (Air), Army Dental Centre (R & R), Delhi, India.
Med J Armed Forces India. 2019 Jul;75(3):318-324. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
The objective of the study was to analyze the quality control of the treatment within the orthodontic department by determining the workload, type of treatment, and quality of outcome.
Two hundred eighty patients were selected from departmental archives, who underwent orthodontic treatment since January 2010 and assessed using index of complexity, outcome and treatment need. Descriptive statistics was performed by SPSS, version 21 (IBM, USA). Mann-Whitney U test was applied to assess the difference between complexity and improvement grade.
Orthodontic treatment was provided to 56.43% of female and 43.57% male patients with a mean age of 16.91 years. Angle's class I type malocclusion was the highest with 35.71%. Preadjusted edgewise metal appliance with 95% dominated the mechanics. About 12.14% and 3.57% patients got benefited with myofunctional and orthopedic treatment, respectively. Ten percent of patients were treated with orthognathic surgery. The mean duration of treatment was 31.19 months with a range of minimum of 17 months to a maximum of 46 months. Among 87.14% patients treated by faculty, 47.95% had difficult complexity grading and 22.95% had very difficult complexity grading. Residents had provided treatment with 63.88% difficult and 19.44% very difficult grade. Mann-Whitney U test of overall complexity and improvement grade showed Z score of -9.25715 which was highly significant.
The present study concludes that fair quality control is being maintained by the department considering the number of patients, its severity, and excellent outcomes. However, being the premier institute of Indian Armed Forces, regular clinical audit should be conducted to fulfill demand and supply ratio in appropriation.
本研究的目的是通过确定工作量、治疗类型和治疗效果质量来分析正畸科内治疗的质量控制。
从科室档案中选取280例自2010年1月起接受正畸治疗的患者,并使用复杂性、结果和治疗需求指数进行评估。使用SPSS 21版软件(美国IBM公司)进行描述性统计。应用曼-惠特尼U检验评估复杂性与改善等级之间的差异。
正畸治疗的女性患者占56.43%,男性患者占43.57%,平均年龄为16.91岁。安氏I类错牙合畸形最为常见,占35.71%。预成方丝弓金属矫治器占主导地位,使用率为95%。分别有12.14%和3.57%的患者从肌功能治疗和矫形治疗中获益。10%的患者接受了正颌手术。治疗的平均持续时间为31.19个月,最短17个月,最长46个月。在由教员治疗的87.14%的患者中,47.95%的患者复杂性分级困难,22.95%的患者复杂性分级非常困难。住院医师治疗的患者中,63.88%的患者分级困难,19.44%的患者分级非常困难。总体复杂性和改善等级的曼-惠特尼U检验显示Z值为-9.25715,具有高度显著性。
本研究得出结论,考虑到患者数量、病情严重程度和良好的治疗效果,该科室保持了合理的质量控制。然而,作为印度武装部队的首要机构,应定期进行临床审计,以实现资源分配中的供需平衡。