Camarata Michelle A, Ala Aftab, Schilsky Michael L
Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Division of Digestive Diseases and Transplantation and Immunology Yale University Medical Center New Haven CT.
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine University of Surrey Guildford United Kingdom.
Hepatol Commun. 2019 Jul 23;3(8):1151-1158. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1384. eCollection 2019 Aug.
We evaluate Wilson disease (WD) treatment with zinc acetate (U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved) and alternative zinc salts. Studies examining zinc therapy in WD are few, and data on alternative zinc salts are limited. We describe one of the largest recent studies of zinc therapy in WD. First, we conducted a single-center retrospective review of 59 patients with WD (age 6-88 years, 32 female patients) treated with zinc (50-150 mg) for 0.8 to 52 years (median, 26 years); most were on prior chelation therapy (n = 39). Second, we developed a survey to explore patients' zinc therapy experience. Primary endpoints were alamine aminotransferase (ALT) and urine copper excretion (µg/24 hours). Urine copper was categorized as low <25 μg (possible overtreatment), target 25-100 μg, or elevated >100 μg (possible noncompliance or treatment failure). The target range was reached in 81% of patients on zinc acetate, 73% on zinc gluconate, and 57% on alternative zinc. Low urine copper was not associated with a high ALT. ALT was normal in 77% of patients with target urine copper but only in 16% with urine copper >100 µg. ALT elevations were not significantly different between zinc salts (Kruskal-Wallis, = 0.26). Our survey demonstrated the mean age of starting zinc was 26.8 years (3.5-65 years); most were treated with zinc acetate (45%) and zinc gluconate (42%). Before zinc treatment, 45% of patients were symptomatic; the majority of patients (80%) were asymptomatic on zinc. Gastrointestinal side effects were the predominant reason for changing zinc salts (38%), but most reported no side effects on current zinc therapy (67%). : Effective treatment with zinc is possible in many patients with WD. The potential for treatment failure suggests close monitoring and consideration of alternative treatments are paramount for those without both a normal serum ALT and appropriate urine copper excretion.
我们评估了醋酸锌(美国食品药品监督管理局批准)及其他锌盐对肝豆状核变性(WD)的治疗效果。关于WD锌疗法的研究较少,且其他锌盐的数据有限。我们描述了近期规模最大的WD锌疗法研究之一。首先,我们对59例接受锌(50 - 150毫克)治疗0.8至52年(中位数为26年)的WD患者(年龄6 - 88岁,32例女性患者)进行了单中心回顾性研究;大多数患者曾接受过螯合治疗(n = 39)。其次,我们开展了一项调查以探究患者的锌疗法体验。主要终点指标为丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)和尿铜排泄量(微克/24小时)。尿铜被分为低水平<25微克(可能过度治疗)、目标水平25 - 100微克或高水平>100微克(可能治疗依从性差或治疗失败)。接受醋酸锌治疗的患者中81%达到了目标范围,接受葡萄糖酸锌治疗的患者中73%达到了目标范围,接受其他锌盐治疗的患者中57%达到了目标范围。低尿铜与高ALT无关。尿铜达到目标水平的患者中77%的ALT正常,但尿铜>100微克的患者中只有16%的ALT正常。不同锌盐之间ALT升高情况无显著差异(Kruskal - Wallis检验,P = 0.26)。我们的调查显示开始使用锌的平均年龄为26.8岁(3.5 - 65岁);大多数患者接受醋酸锌(45%)和葡萄糖酸锌(42%)治疗。在使用锌治疗前,45%的患者有症状;大多数患者(80%)在使用锌治疗时无症状。胃肠道副作用是更换锌盐的主要原因(38%),但大多数患者报告目前使用锌治疗时无副作用(67%)。:许多WD患者使用锌治疗可能有效。对于血清ALT未正常且尿铜排泄量不合适的患者,治疗失败的可能性表明密切监测和考虑替代治疗至关重要。