• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮电神经刺激治疗镰状细胞疼痛危象

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation treatment of sickle cell pain crises.

作者信息

Wang W C, George S L, Wilimas J A

机构信息

Department of Hematology-Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tenn.

出版信息

Acta Haematol. 1988;80(2):99-102. doi: 10.1159/000205612.

DOI:10.1159/000205612
PMID:3138879
Abstract

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) has been used in a variety of acute and chronic painful conditions, but has not been studied in sickle cell pain crises. We compared TENS versus placebo in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study involving 60 trials in 4 crisis severity categories. TENS electrodes were applied to the area of severest pain and patients' pain ratings and medication usage were evaluated over a 4-hour period. Pain ratings and analgesic requirements at 1 and 4 h from onset of study were similar in the TENS and placebo groups. Patients assessments of overall treatment efficacy indicated that TENS was more frequently helpful, but there was a substantial placebo effect. Although the value of TENS in this condition was not established in this study, further trials, using varied stimulation parameters, are warranted.

摘要

经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)已被用于多种急慢性疼痛病症,但尚未在镰状细胞疼痛危象中进行研究。我们在一项随机、双盲、交叉研究中比较了TENS与安慰剂,该研究涉及4种危机严重程度类别中的60次试验。将TENS电极置于最疼痛区域,并在4小时内评估患者的疼痛评分和药物使用情况。TENS组和安慰剂组在研究开始后1小时和4小时的疼痛评分及镇痛需求相似。患者对总体治疗效果的评估表明,TENS更常有效,但存在显著的安慰剂效应。尽管本研究未确定TENS在这种病症中的价值,但有必要使用不同的刺激参数进行进一步试验。

相似文献

1
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation treatment of sickle cell pain crises.经皮电神经刺激治疗镰状细胞疼痛危象
Acta Haematol. 1988;80(2):99-102. doi: 10.1159/000205612.
2
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus oral analgesic: a randomized double-blind controlled study in acute traumatic pain.
Am J Emerg Med. 1987 Jan;5(1):6-10. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(87)90281-6.
3
Effect of Unmodulated 5-kHz Alternating Currents Versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Mechanical and Thermal Pain, Tactile Threshold, and Peripheral Nerve Conduction: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial.未调制的5千赫兹交流电与经皮电刺激神经疗法对机械性和热性疼痛、触觉阈值及周围神经传导的影响:一项双盲、安慰剂对照的交叉试验
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 May;98(5):888-895. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.11.020. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
4
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation following appendicectomy: the placebo effect.阑尾切除术后的经皮电神经刺激:安慰剂效应。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1986 Jul;68(4):191-2.
5
Pain relief by applying transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) during unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.经皮神经电刺激(TENS)在无镇静结肠镜检查期间缓解疼痛:一项随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。
Eur J Pain. 2011 Jan;15(1):29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.05.006. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
6
Hypoalgesic effect of the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation following inguinal herniorrhaphy: a randomized, controlled trial.腹股沟疝修补术后经皮电刺激神经的镇痛效果:一项随机对照试验。
J Pain. 2008 Jul;9(7):623-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.01.337. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
7
Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain perception threshold of human teeth: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.经皮电神经刺激对人牙齿疼痛感知阈值的影响:一项双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2000 Jun;4(2):81-6. doi: 10.1007/s007840050120.
8
Hypoalgesia in response to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) depends on stimulation intensity.经皮电神经刺激(TENS)的镇痛作用取决于刺激强度。
J Pain. 2011 Aug;12(8):929-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.02.352. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
9
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Reduces Resting Pain in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Randomized and Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Pilot Study.经皮神经电刺激可减轻头颈部癌症患者的静息痛:一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲的初步研究。
Cancer Nurs. 2019 May/Jun;42(3):218-228. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000594.
10
Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the effects of low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on central pain modulation: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.低频经皮电神经刺激对中枢疼痛调制影响的功能磁共振成像:一项双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Clin J Pain. 2012 Sep;28(7):581-8. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31823c2bd7.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidelines for the management of emergencies and critical illness in pediatric and adult patients with sickle cell disease.镰状细胞病儿童及成人患者的急诊与危重症管理指南
Ann Intensive Care. 2025 May 29;15(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01479-3.
2
Characterising the Features of 381 Clinical Studies Evaluating Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Pain Relief: A Secondary Analysis of the Meta-TENS Study to Improve Future Research.对 381 项评估经皮神经电刺激(TENS)缓解疼痛的临床研究特征进行描述:改善未来研究的 Meta-TENS 研究的二次分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jun 14;58(6):803. doi: 10.3390/medicina58060803.
3
Mechanisms of pain in sickle cell disease.
镰状细胞病的疼痛机制。
Br J Pain. 2021 May;15(2):213-220. doi: 10.1177/2049463720920682. Epub 2020 May 22.
4
American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for sickle cell disease: management of acute and chronic pain.美国血液学会2020年镰状细胞病指南:急性和慢性疼痛的管理
Blood Adv. 2020 Jun 23;4(12):2656-2701. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001851.
5
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain management in sickle cell disease.经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)用于镰状细胞病的疼痛管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 3;3(3):CD012762. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012762.pub2.
6
Interventions for treating neuropathic pain in people with sickle cell disease.镰状细胞病患者神经性疼痛的治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 5;7(7):CD012943. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012943.pub2.
7
Daily functioning and quality of life in children with sickle cell disease pain: relationship with family and neighborhood socioeconomic distress.镰状细胞病疼痛患儿的日常功能和生活质量:与家庭及邻里社会经济困境的关系
J Pain. 2008 Sep;9(9):833-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.04.002. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
8
Pain management in children with sickle cell disease.镰状细胞病患儿的疼痛管理
Paediatr Drugs. 2003;5(4):229-41. doi: 10.2165/00128072-200305040-00003.