• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声测量股四头肌最大压缩厚度在评估不同容量状态危重症患者营养风险中的作用

The role of maximum compressed thickness of the quadriceps femoris muscle measured by ultrasonography in assessing nutritional risk in critically-ill patients with different volume statuses.

作者信息

Özdemir Uğur, Özdemir Merve, Aygencel Gulbin, Kaya Burcu, Türkoğlu Melda

机构信息

Internal Medicine specialist, Fellow of Critical Care Medicine. Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Başkent University Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2019 Aug 5;65(7):952-958. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.7.952.

DOI:10.1590/1806-9282.65.7.952
PMID:31389504
Abstract

PURPOSE

In this prospective observational study, we aimed to investigate the role of the maximum compressed (MC) and uncompressed (UC) thickness of the quadriceps femoris muscle (QFMT) measured by ultrasonography (USG) in the detection of nutritional risk in intensive care patients (ICPs) with different volume status.

METHODS

55 patients were included. Right, left, and total ucQFMT and mcQFMT measurements were obtained by a standard USG device within the first 48 hours after ICU admission. Clinical examination and the USG device were used to determine the volume status of the patients. SOFA, APACHE II, modified NUTRIC scores, and demographic data were collected.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between the nutritional risk of patients in terms of left, right, and total mcQFMT measurements (p=0.025, p=0.039; p=0.028, respectively), mechanical ventilation requirement (p=0.014), presence of infection (p=0.019), and sepsis (p=0.006). There was no significant difference between different volume statuses in terms of mcQFMT measurements. In the multi-variance analysis, mcQFMT measurements were found to be independently associated with high nutritional risk (p=0.019, Exp(B)=0.256, 95%CI=0.082-0.800 for modified NUTRIC score ≥ 5), and higher nutritional risk (p=0.009, Exp(B)=0.144, 95%CI=0.033-0.620 for modified NUTRIC score ≥ 6). a Total mcQFMT value below 1.36 cm was a predictor for higher nutritional risk with 79% sensitivity and 70% specificity (AUC=0.749, p=0.002, likelihood ratio=2.04).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonographic measurement of total mcQFMT can be used as a novel nutritional risk assessment parameter in medical ICPs with different volume statuses. Thus, patients who could benefit from aggressive nutritional therapy can be easily identified in these patient groups.

摘要

目的

在这项前瞻性观察性研究中,我们旨在探讨通过超声检查(USG)测量的股四头肌最大压缩厚度(MC)和未压缩厚度(UC)在检测不同容量状态的重症监护患者(ICP)营养风险中的作用。

方法

纳入55例患者。在入住ICU后的头48小时内,使用标准USG设备测量右、左以及双侧的未压缩股四头肌厚度(ucQFMT)和最大压缩股四头肌厚度(mcQFMT)。通过临床检查和USG设备确定患者的容量状态。收集序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、改良营养风险评分(NUTRIC)以及人口统计学数据。

结果

在左侧、右侧以及双侧mcQFMT测量方面,患者的营养风险存在显著差异(分别为p = 0.025、p = 0.039;p = 0.028),机械通气需求(p = 0.014)、感染存在情况(p = 0.019)以及脓毒症(p = 0.006)方面也存在显著差异。在mcQFMT测量方面,不同容量状态之间无显著差异。在多变量分析中,发现mcQFMT测量与高营养风险独立相关(改良NUTRIC评分≥5时,p = 0.019,Exp(B)=0.256,95%CI = 0.082 - 0.800),以及更高的营养风险(改良NUTRIC评分≥6时,p = 0.009,Exp(B)=0.144,95%CI = 0.033 - 0.620)。总mcQFMT值低于1.36 cm是更高营养风险的预测指标,灵敏度为79%,特异度为70%(AUC = 0.749,p = 0.002,似然比 = 2.04)。

结论

超声测量双侧mcQFMT可作为不同容量状态的重症监护医学患者新的营养风险评估参数。因此,在这些患者群体中,可以轻松识别出可能从积极营养治疗中获益的患者。

相似文献

1
The role of maximum compressed thickness of the quadriceps femoris muscle measured by ultrasonography in assessing nutritional risk in critically-ill patients with different volume statuses.超声测量股四头肌最大压缩厚度在评估不同容量状态危重症患者营养风险中的作用
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2019 Aug 5;65(7):952-958. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.7.952.
2
Identifying critically-ill patients who will benefit most from nutritional therapy: Further validation of the "modified NUTRIC" nutritional risk assessment tool.识别最能从营养治疗中获益的重症患者:“改良NUTRIC”营养风险评估工具的进一步验证
Clin Nutr. 2016 Feb;35(1):158-162. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
3
Association between ultrasound quadriceps muscle status with premorbid functional status and 60-day mortality in mechanically ventilated critically ill patient: A single-center prospective observational study.超声股四头肌状态与机械通气危重症患者发病前功能状态和 60 天死亡率的关系:一项单中心前瞻性观察研究。
Clin Nutr. 2021 Mar;40(3):1338-1347. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.08.022. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
4
Nutritional risk assessment and cultural validation of the modified NUTRIC score in critically ill patients-A multicenter prospective cohort study.危重症患者改良NUTRIC评分的营养风险评估及文化验证——一项多中心前瞻性队列研究
J Crit Care. 2017 Feb;37:45-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
5
Rectus abdominis and rectus femoris muscle thickness in determining nutritional risk in critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study in Turkey.在土耳其进行的一项前瞻性队列研究:腹直肌和股直肌厚度与危重症患者营养风险的关系。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 30;13(3):e071796. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071796.
6
[Comparative study on nutritional status of patients in intensive care unit with different assessment tools].[不同评估工具对重症监护病房患者营养状况的比较研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Jan;32(1):72-77. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20190923-00013.
7
Prognostic Performance of NUTRIC Score in Quantifying Malnutrition Risk in the Critically Ill in Congruence With the Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis.NUTRIC 评分在与生物电阻抗分析相结合量化危重症患者营养风险方面的预后性能。
Nutr Clin Pract. 2020 Jun;35(3):559-566. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10440. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
8
Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill Versus the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002: Are They Comparable for Assessing Risk of Malnutrition in Critically Ill Patients?危重症患者的营养风险与营养风险筛查 2002:它们在评估危重症患者营养风险方面是否具有可比性?
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2019 Jan;43(1):81-87. doi: 10.1002/jpen.1181. Epub 2018 May 30.
9
Thigh ultrasound monitoring identifies muscle atrophy in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients.大腿超声监测可识别机械通气的儿科患者的肌肉萎缩。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Dec;182(12):5543-5551. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05233-4. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
10
Ultrasonographic assessment of muscle layer thickness and its relation to patient outcome in a medical intensive care unit.超声评估肌肉层厚度及其与重症监护病房患者转归的关系。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2023 Jun;55:128-135. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.02.023. Epub 2023 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Recognizing malnutrition in adults with critical illness: Guidance statements from the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition.识别危重症成年患者的营养不良:全球营养不良领导倡议组织的指导声明
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2025 May;49(4):405-413. doi: 10.1002/jpen.2748. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
2
Methodologies and clinical applications of lower limb muscle ultrasound in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.危重症患者下肢肌肉超声的方法学及临床应用:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Oct 24;14(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01395-y.
3
Clinical practice guidelines for nutritional assessment and monitoring of adult ICU patients in China.
《中国成人重症监护病房患者营养评估与监测临床实践指南》
J Intensive Med. 2024 Feb 2;4(2):137-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2023.12.002. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
An Observational Study of Nutritional Assessment, Prescription, Practices, and Its Outcome among Critically Ill Patients Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit.对入住重症监护病房的危重症患者进行营养评估、处方、实践及其结果的观察性研究。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Apr;28(4):364-368. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24676.
5
The thickness of erector spinae muscles can be easily measured by computed tomography for the assessment of physical activity: An observational study.通过计算断层扫描可以轻松测量竖脊肌的厚度,用于评估身体活动:一项观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 23;101(38):e30704. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030704.
6
Usefulness of Muscle Ultrasonography in the Nutritional Assessment of Adult Patients with Cystic Fibrosis.肌肉超声检查在成人囊性纤维化患者营养评估中的应用。
Nutrients. 2022 Aug 17;14(16):3377. doi: 10.3390/nu14163377.
7
Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in the Field of Diabetology.糖尿病学领域的即时超声检查(POCUS)
Int J Chronic Dis. 2021 Mar 8;2021:8857016. doi: 10.1155/2021/8857016. eCollection 2021.