• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利伐沙班 15 或 20 毫克与维生素 K 拮抗剂在非瓣膜性心房颤动中的疗效和安全性。

Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban 15 or 20 mg Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.

机构信息

From the Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, CHU de Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux, France (P.B., C.D.-P., M.-A.B., R.L., C.D.-P., N.M.).

Hôpital Trousseau-CHU de Tours, Service de cardiologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université François Rabelais, France (L.F.).

出版信息

Stroke. 2019 Sep;50(9):2469-2476. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025824. Epub 2019 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025824
PMID:31390972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6727926/
Abstract

Background and Purpose- We compared the 1-year safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban 15 mg (R15) or rivaroxaban 20 mg (R20) to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Methods- New user cohort study of patients dispensed R15 or R20 versus VKA in 2013 or 2014 for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, followed 1 year in the French Système National des Données de Santé (66 million people). R15 and R20 users were matched 1:1 with VKA users on sex, age, date of first drug dispensing, and high-dimensional propensity score. Hazard ratios (95% CIs) for stroke and systemic embolism, major bleeding, and death were computed using Cox proportional hazards or models by Fine and Gray during exposure. Results- In 31 171 matched R20 and VKA, mean age, 71; 62% men; 76% with CHADS-VASc ≥2; 5% HAS-BLED >3 (hypertension, abnormal renal and liver function, stroke, bleeding, labile INR, elderly, drugs or alcohol); incidence rates for stroke and systemic embolism were 1.5% and 1.9% (hazard ratio, 0.79 [0.69-0.90]); major bleeding, 1.5% and 2.2% (0.67 [0.59-0.77]); death, 3.9% and 5.8% (0.67 [0.61-0.73]). In 23 314 matched R15 and VKA patients, mean age, 80; 47% men; 93% with CHADS-VASc ≥2 and 9% with HAS-BLED >3; incidence rates of stroke and systemic embolism were 2.3% and 2.1% (1.05 [0.92-1.21]); major bleeding, 2.4% and 2.9% (0.84 [0.74-0.96]); death, 9.1% and 10.8% (0.85 [0.79-0.90]). Numbers needed to treat to observe one fewer death (NNT) were 46 for R15 and 61 for R20. Conclusions- In real life in France over 2013 to 2015, R15 and R20 were at least as effective and safer than VKA. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.encepp.eu. Unique identifier: EUPAS14567.

摘要

背景和目的-我们比较了利伐沙班 15 毫克(R15)或利伐沙班 20 毫克(R20)与维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKA)在非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中的 1 年安全性和有效性。方法-2013 年或 2014 年,对新使用 R15 或 R20 或 VKA 治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动的患者进行新用户队列研究,在法国国家健康数据系统(6600 万人)中随访 1 年。R15 和 R20 使用者按性别、年龄、首次药物分配日期和高维倾向评分与 VKA 使用者 1:1 匹配。使用 Cox 比例风险或 Fine 和 Gray 模型在暴露期间计算中风和全身性栓塞、大出血和死亡的风险比(95%CI)。结果-在 31171 例匹配的 R20 和 VKA 中,平均年龄为 71 岁;62%为男性;76%的 CHADS-VASc≥2;5%的 HAS-BLED>3(高血压、肾功能和肝功能异常、中风、出血、不稳定 INR、老年、药物或酒精);中风和全身性栓塞的发生率分别为 1.5%和 1.9%(风险比,0.79[0.69-0.90]);大出血发生率分别为 1.5%和 2.2%(0.67[0.59-0.77]);死亡率分别为 3.9%和 5.8%(0.67[0.61-0.73])。在 23314 例匹配的 R15 和 VKA 患者中,平均年龄为 80 岁;47%为男性;93%的 CHADS-VASc≥2,9%的 HAS-BLED>3;中风和全身性栓塞的发生率分别为 2.3%和 2.1%(1.05[0.92-1.21]);大出血发生率分别为 2.4%和 2.9%(0.84[0.74-0.96]);死亡率分别为 9.1%和 10.8%(0.85[0.79-0.90])。观察到死亡人数减少 1 例所需的治疗人数(NNT)分别为 R15 的 46 例和 R20 的 61 例。结论-在 2013 年至 2015 年法国的真实生活中,R15 和 R20 的疗效至少与 VKA 一样有效且更安全。临床试验注册-网址:http://www.encepp.eu。唯一标识符:EUPAS14567。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f5f/6727926/5d32788e84cb/str-50-2469-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f5f/6727926/42047dfa8431/str-50-2469-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f5f/6727926/1ba29a38be8a/str-50-2469-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f5f/6727926/5d32788e84cb/str-50-2469-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f5f/6727926/42047dfa8431/str-50-2469-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f5f/6727926/1ba29a38be8a/str-50-2469-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f5f/6727926/5d32788e84cb/str-50-2469-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban 15 or 20 mg Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.利伐沙班 15 或 20 毫克与维生素 K 拮抗剂在非瓣膜性心房颤动中的疗效和安全性。
Stroke. 2019 Sep;50(9):2469-2476. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025824. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
2
Effectiveness and safety of 110 or 150 mg dabigatran vs. vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.110 或 150mg 达比加群与维生素 K 拮抗剂在非瓣膜性心房颤动中的疗效和安全性。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Feb;85(2):432-441. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13815. Epub 2018 Dec 16.
3
Comparison of the short-term risk of bleeding and arterial thromboembolic events in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients newly treated with dabigatran or rivaroxaban versus vitamin K antagonists: a French nationwide propensity-matched cohort study.达比加群或利伐沙班与维生素K拮抗剂新治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者出血和动脉血栓栓塞事件短期风险的比较:一项法国全国性倾向匹配队列研究。
Circulation. 2015 Sep 29;132(13):1252-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.015710. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
4
Comparative Real-Life Effectiveness and Safety of Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban vs. Vitamin K Antagonists: A High-Dimensional Propensity Score Matched New Users Cohort Study in the French National Healthcare Data System SNDS.达比加群或利伐沙班与维生素 K 拮抗剂的真实世界疗效和安全性比较:法国国家医疗保健数据系统 SNDS 中高维倾向评分匹配新使用者队列研究。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2020 Feb;20(1):81-103. doi: 10.1007/s40256-019-00359-z.
5
Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Oral Anticoagulants in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: The NAXOS Study.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者口服抗凝药的安全性和有效性比较:NAXOS 研究。
Stroke. 2020 Jul;51(7):2066-2075. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.028825. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
6
Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin among elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the Rivaroxaban Once Daily, Oral, Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared With Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation (ROCKET AF).在每日口服一次利伐沙班、直接 Xa 因子抑制剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂预防心房颤动卒中及栓塞试验(ROCKET AF)中,与华法林相比,利伐沙班在老年非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中的疗效和安全性。
Circulation. 2014 Jul 8;130(2):138-46. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005008. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
7
Optimal Rivaroxaban Dose in Asian Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Normal or Mildly Impaired Renal Function.亚洲房颤且肾功能正常或轻度受损患者的最佳利伐沙班剂量。
Stroke. 2019 May;50(5):1140-1148. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024210.
8
Number needed to treat based on real-world evidence for non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.基于真实世界证据的非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝药与维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝药用于非瓣膜性心房颤动患者卒中预防的治疗需要人数。
J Med Econ. 2019 Aug;22(8):760-765. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1606001. Epub 2019 May 3.
9
Rivaroxaban versus warfarin and dabigatran in atrial fibrillation: comparative effectiveness and safety in Danish routine care.利伐沙班与华法林及达比加群用于房颤治疗:丹麦常规医疗中的比较有效性与安全性
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Nov;25(11):1236-1244. doi: 10.1002/pds.4034. Epub 2016 May 27.
10
Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Severe Kidney Disease or Undergoing Hemodialysis.利伐沙班与华法林用于非瓣膜性心房颤动且伴有严重肾脏疾病或正在接受血液透析的患者。
Am J Med. 2019 Sep;132(9):1078-1083. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.04.013. Epub 2019 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of ABCB1, CYP3A4/5 and ABCG2 gene polymorphisms on rivaroxaban trough concentrations and bleeding events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.ABCB1、CYP3A4/5 和 ABCG2 基因多态性对非瓣膜性心房颤动患者利伐沙班谷浓度和出血事件的影响。
Hum Genomics. 2023 Jul 7;17(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s40246-023-00506-3.
2
A retrospective study of real-world effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯非瓣膜性心房颤动和静脉血栓栓塞症患者利伐沙班真实世界疗效和安全性的回顾性研究。
PeerJ. 2022 Sep 9;10:e13974. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13974. eCollection 2022.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Standard or Reduced Dose Dabigatran vs. Rivaroxaban in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.标准剂量或降低剂量达比加群与利伐沙班用于非瓣膜性心房颤动的比较有效性和安全性。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jun;105(6):1439-1455. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1318. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
2
Effectiveness and safety of 110 or 150 mg dabigatran vs. vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.110 或 150mg 达比加群与维生素 K 拮抗剂在非瓣膜性心房颤动中的疗效和安全性。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Feb;85(2):432-441. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13815. Epub 2018 Dec 16.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, codes of heart failure in an administrative database.
Concurrent use of statins decreases major bleeding and intracerebral hemorrhage in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients taking direct oral anticoagulants-A nationwide cohort study.
在服用直接口服抗凝剂的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中,他汀类药物的联合使用可减少大出血和脑出血——一项全国性队列研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 8;9:969259. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.969259. eCollection 2022.
4
Utility of automated data-adaptive propensity score method for confounding by indication in comparative effectiveness study in real world Medicare and registry data.自动化数据自适应倾向评分法在真实世界 Medicare 和注册研究中用于指示性混杂的比较有效性研究中的效用。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 15;17(8):e0272975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272975. eCollection 2022.
5
Current Therapeutic Approach to Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Congenital Hemophilia.先天性血友病患者心房颤动的当前治疗方法
J Pers Med. 2022 Mar 23;12(4):519. doi: 10.3390/jpm12040519.
6
A Comparative Study of the Clinical Benefits of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin in Patients With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation With High Bleeding Risk.利伐沙班与华法林对高出血风险非瓣膜性心房颤动患者临床获益的比较研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 16;9:803233. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.803233. eCollection 2022.
7
Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Warfarin in Octogenarians with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林用于老年非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 12;10(22):5268. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225268.
8
Patients with stable coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes but without prior myocardial infarction or stroke and THEMIS-like patients: real-world prevalence and risk of major outcomes from the SNDS French nationwide claims database.稳定性冠心病合并 2 型糖尿病但无心肌梗死或卒史且类似 THEMIS 患者:来自法国全国索赔数据库的 SNDS 的真实世界主要结局的患病率和风险。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Nov 25;20(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01416-1.
9
Real-life data of major and minor bleeding events with direct oral anticoagulants in the one-year follow-up period: The NOAC-TURK study.直接口服抗凝剂在一年随访期间的大出血和轻微出血事件的真实数据:NOAC-TURK 研究。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2021 Mar;25(3):196-204. doi: 10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2021.57635.
10
The Multifaceted Interplay between Atrial Fibrillation and Myocardial Infarction: A Review.心房颤动与心肌梗死之间的多方面相互作用:综述
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 7;10(2):198. doi: 10.3390/jcm10020198.
国际疾病分类第十版心力衰竭编码在行政数据库中的诊断准确性。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Feb;28(2):194-200. doi: 10.1002/pds.4690. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
4
Effectiveness and Safety of Standard- and Low-Dose Rivaroxaban in Asians With Atrial Fibrillation.亚洲人群心房颤动患者应用标准剂量及低剂量利伐沙班的有效性及安全性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 31;72(5):477-485. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.084.
5
Comparative effectiveness and safety of apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班的疗效和安全性比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 1;268:113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.047. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
6
Dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban vs. high TTR warfarin in atrial fibrillation.达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班与房颤中高 TTR 的华法林比较。
Thromb Res. 2018 Jul;167:113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 May 17.
7
Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Frail Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.非瓣膜性心房颤动虚弱患者中阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班与华法林的有效性和安全性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 13;7(8):e008643. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008643.
8
Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Warfarin in Asians With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.亚洲非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中阿哌沙班、达比加群、利伐沙班和华法林的疗效和安全性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 5;7(8):e008150. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008150.
9
The effectiveness and safety of low-dose rivaroxaban in Asians with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.亚洲非瓣膜性心房颤动患者应用低剂量利伐沙班的有效性和安全性。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Jun 15;261:78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.063. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
10
Comparison of Treatment Persistence with Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban versus Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Competing Risk Analysis in the French National Health Care Databases.比较达比加群或利伐沙班与维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂在房颤患者中的治疗持久性:法国国家卫生保健数据库中的竞争风险分析。
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Jan;38(1):6-18. doi: 10.1002/phar.2046. Epub 2017 Dec 11.