Department Experimental Pain Research, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department Physiology I, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Eur J Pain. 2020 Jan;24(1):122-133. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1467. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
Sinusoidal current stimuli preferentially activate C-nociceptors. Sodium channel isoforms NaV1.7 and NaV1.8 have been implicated in this. Sympathetic efferent neurons lack NaV1.8 and were explored upon sinusoidal activation.
Quantitative Sudomotor Axon Reflex Test (QSART) was performed in hairy (n = 16) and glabrous (n = 12) skin. Responses of sympathetic efferents (n = 10) and nociceptive afferents (n = 21) to sinusoidal current stimulation (4 Hz, 0.05-0.15 mA) were recorded in humans by microneurography (n = 11). Activation of sympathetic units upon supra-threshold sinusoidal currents (>0.8 mA) was recorded in pigs (n = 8).
Sinusoidal stimuli (4 Hz, 0.4 mA) evoked weak sweat output (30 ml/h/m ) in hairy skin compared to rectangular pulses (4 Hz, 5 mA, 53 ml/h/m , p < .00001, ANOVA). No change in sweat output was recorded from glabrous skin to sine wave stimuli. Sinusoidal current at intensities ranging from 0.05 to 0.15 mA activated almost all (85%) nociceptors but only 40% of sympathetic units in human. Stimuli lead to a significantly lower activation in sympathetic versus nociceptive fibres as measured by activity-dependent slowing (ADS) of conduction (sympathetic efferents average ADS 100 ± 0.2% vs. C-nociceptors average ADS 113 ± 4%, p < .003, ANOVA).
Sympathetic efferent neurons are less apt to convert slow depolarizations into action potentials as compared to nociceptors. Distinctive sodium channel expression patterns between nociceptors and sympathetic efferent neurons may account for this difference. Sinusoidal stimulation therefore provokes weak sweat responses and provides no alternative for clinical assessment of autonomic function.
C-nociceptors in hairy skin are activated by 4 Hz sinusoidal current stimulation at lower intensities than myelinated fibres. Sympathetic efferent neurons-albeit also unmyelinated-are less responsive to sinusoidal activation than nociceptors within the same skin area. Cutaneous sympathetic efferent neurons apparently are less apt than nociceptors to convert slow depolarization into action potentials.
正弦电流刺激优先激活 C 型伤害感受器。钠通道亚型 NaV1.7 和 NaV1.8 与此有关。交感传出神经元缺乏 NaV1.8,并在正弦波激活时进行了探索。
在有毛(n=16)和无毛(n=12)皮肤中进行定量汗腺反射测试(QSART)。通过微神经记录(n=11)在人类中记录了交感传出神经(n=10)和伤害感受器传入神经(n=21)对正弦电流刺激(4 Hz,0.05-0.15 mA)的反应。在猪(n=8)中记录了超过阈限正弦电流(>0.8 mA)对交感单位的激活。
与矩形脉冲(4 Hz,5 mA,53 ml/h/m ,p<.00001,方差分析)相比,正弦刺激(4 Hz,0.4 mA)在有毛皮肤中仅引起较弱的出汗量(30 ml/h/m )。无毛皮肤对正弦波刺激没有记录到出汗量的变化。在 0.05 至 0.15 mA 的强度范围内,正弦电流几乎激活了所有(85%)伤害感受器,但仅激活了人类 40%的交感单位。通过传导的活动依赖性减慢(ADS)测量,刺激导致交感纤维与伤害感受器纤维的激活显著降低(交感传出纤维平均 ADS 100±0.2%与 C 型伤害感受器平均 ADS 113±4%,p<.003,方差分析)。
与伤害感受器相比,交感传出神经元将缓慢去极化转换为动作电位的能力较差。伤害感受器和交感传出神经元之间独特的钠通道表达模式可能解释了这种差异。因此,正弦刺激引起较弱的出汗反应,并且不能替代自主功能的临床评估。
与有髓纤维相比,4 Hz 正弦电流刺激在较低强度下激活有毛皮肤中的 C 型伤害感受器。尽管交感传出神经元也是无髓鞘的,但与同一皮肤区域内的伤害感受器相比,它们对正弦波激活的反应性较低。皮肤交感传出神经元显然不如伤害感受器容易将缓慢去极化转换为动作电位。