Arous Edward J, Judelson Dejah R, Malka Kimberly T, Wyman Allison S, Simons Jessica P, Aiello Francesco A, Arous Elias J, Schanzer Andres
Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA.
Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Nov;61:227-232. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.05.051. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
Carotid duplex is the first-line imaging modality for characterizing degree of carotid stenosis. The Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC), in published guideline documents, has endorsed use of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) criteria to characterize ≥70% stenosis: peak systolic velocity (PSV) ≥230 cm/s. We sought to perform a validation of the SRU criteria using computed tomography (CT) angiography as a gold standard imaging modality and to perform a sensitivity analysis to determine optimal velocity criteria for identifying ≥80% stenosis.
We queried all carotid duplex examinations performed at our institution between 2008 and 2017. Patients with ≥70% carotid stenosis, based on previous criteria, were identified. Of these patients, those who also had a CT angiogram of the neck within one year formed the study cohort. Patients who underwent carotid revascularization between the 2 imaging dates were excluded. Degree of stenosis, as reported from the CT angiogram, was considered the true degree of stenosis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to evaluate the SRU criteria and to identify the optimal discrimination threshold for high-grade carotid stenosis.
Of 37,204 carotid duplex examinations, 3,478 arteries met criteria for ≥70% stenosis. Of these, 344 patients had a CT angiogram within 1 year of the carotid duplex (mean time between studies, 55 days, SD 6.5) and 240 (69.8%) were consistent with ≥80% carotid stenosis. The predictive ability of the SRU criteria to identify ≥70% stenosis was poor, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.51. A sensitivity analysis to identify ≥80% stenosis demonstrated the optimal discrimination threshold to be PSV ≥450 cm/s or end diastolic velocity (EDV) ≥120 cm/s, with an AUC of 0.66.
In this validation study, the SRU criteria, endorsed by the IAC, to identify ≥70% carotid stenosis had no predictive value. For detection of ≥80% stenosis, the optimal criteria are a PSV ≥450 cm/s or EDV ≥120 cm/s. This study demonstrates the critical importance of carotid duplex examination validation.
颈动脉双功超声是用于评估颈动脉狭窄程度的一线成像方式。跨学会认证委员会(IAC)在已发布的指南文件中,认可使用超声放射学会(SRU)的标准来评估≥70%的狭窄:收缩期峰值流速(PSV)≥230 cm/s。我们试图以计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影作为金标准成像方式,对SRU标准进行验证,并进行敏感性分析以确定识别≥80%狭窄的最佳流速标准。
我们查询了2008年至2017年在我们机构进行的所有颈动脉双功超声检查。根据先前标准,确定颈动脉狭窄≥70%的患者。在这些患者中,那些在一年内也进行了颈部CT血管造影的患者组成了研究队列。排除在两次成像日期之间接受颈动脉血运重建的患者。CT血管造影报告的狭窄程度被视为真正的狭窄程度。生成受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线以评估SRU标准,并确定重度颈动脉狭窄的最佳鉴别阈值。
在37204次颈动脉双功超声检查中,3478条动脉符合≥70%狭窄的标准。其中,344例患者在颈动脉双功超声检查后1年内进行了CT血管造影(两次检查之间的平均时间为55天,标准差6.5),240例(69.8%)符合≥80%的颈动脉狭窄。SRU标准识别≥70%狭窄的预测能力较差,ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.51。识别≥80%狭窄的敏感性分析表明最佳鉴别阈值为PSV≥450 cm/s或舒张末期流速(EDV)≥120 cm/s,AUC为0.66。
在这项验证研究中,IAC认可的SRU标准识别≥70%颈动脉狭窄没有预测价值。对于检测≥80%的狭窄,最佳标准是PSV≥450 cm/s或EDV≥120 cm/s。本研究证明了颈动脉双功超声检查验证的至关重要性。