Suppr超能文献

血管内动脉瘤封堵术及烟囱式血管内动脉瘤封堵术治疗血管内动脉瘤修复术后Ia型和III型内漏

Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing and Chimney Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing in the Treatment of Type Ia and Type III Endoleaks After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

作者信息

Lareyre Fabien, Mialhe Claude, Dommerc Carine, Raffort Juliette

机构信息

Cardiovascular Surgery Unit, Cardio Thoracic Centre of Monaco, Monaco; Université Côte d'Azur, CHU, Inserm, C3M, Nice, France.

Cardiovascular Surgery Unit, Cardio Thoracic Centre of Monaco, Monaco.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Nov;61:317-325. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.05.029. Epub 2019 Aug 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to report the treatment of type Ia and type III endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or chimney EVAR using endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) and chimney EVAS.

METHODS

Ten consecutive patients who underwent the EVAS procedure to treat endoleaks after EVAR were retrospectively included between July 2015 and July 2017. Technical success of EVAS was defined as a successful sealing of the Nellix endograft with visceral vessel patency on intraoperative completion angiography.

RESULTS

The median time between EVAR and EVAS procedure was 41.5 months (29-81.8). Eight patients had an elective procedure, whereas 2 were treated in emergency. Chimney endografts were placed during the EVAS procedure in 4 patients, whereas classic EVAS was performed for the other 6 patients. The median procedural time was 222.5 min (138.8-418.8). The technical success was achieved for all patients. The median length of stay after EVAS was 7 days (6.8-14). No death related to abdominal aortic aneurysms or vascular complications were reported for a median follow-up duration of 13.5 months (6.3-25.5). A reintervention was required for 2 patients who developed persistent type II and type Ia endoleaks, which were successfully treated using an embolization procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

EVAS and chimney EVAS in the treatment of type Ia and type III endoleaks after EVAR and chimney EVAR are technically feasible. Short-term follow-up suggests that the procedure is a safe and efficient therapeutic alternative to manage disabled EVAR.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在报告使用血管腔内动脉瘤封堵术(EVAS)和烟囱式EVAS治疗血管腔内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)或烟囱式EVAR术后Ia型和III型内漏的情况。

方法

回顾性纳入2015年7月至2017年7月期间连续10例行EVAS治疗EVAR术后内漏的患者。EVAS的技术成功定义为术中完成血管造影时Nellix血管内移植物成功封堵且内脏血管通畅。

结果

EVAR与EVAS手术之间的中位时间为41.5个月(29 - 81.8个月)。8例患者接受择期手术,2例为急诊治疗。4例患者在EVAS手术期间放置了烟囱式血管内移植物,另外6例患者进行了经典EVAS手术。中位手术时间为222.5分钟(138.8 - 418.8分钟)。所有患者均取得技术成功。EVAS术后的中位住院时间为7天(6.8 - 14天)。中位随访时间为13.5个月(6.3 - 25.5个月),未报告与腹主动脉瘤或血管并发症相关的死亡病例。2例出现持续性II型和Ia型内漏的患者需要再次干预,通过栓塞手术成功治疗。

结论

EVAS和烟囱式EVAS治疗EVAR和烟囱式EVAR术后Ia型和III型内漏在技术上是可行的。短期随访表明,该手术是管理失败的EVAR的一种安全有效的治疗选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验