Department of Psychology and York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, UK.
Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, UK.
Cortex. 2019 Nov;120:308-325. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
How does the brain represent and process different types of knowledge? The Dual Hub account postulates that anterior temporal lobes (ATL) support taxonomic relationships based on shared physical features (mole - cat), while temporoparietal regions, including posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG), support thematic associations (mole - earth). Conversely, the Controlled Semantic Cognition account proposes that ATL supports both aspects of knowledge, while left pMTG contributes to controlled retrieval. This study used magnetoencephalography to test these contrasting predictions of functional dissociations within the temporal lobe. ATL and pMTG responded more strongly to taxonomic and thematic trials respectively, matched for behavioural performance, in line with predictions of the Dual Hub account. In addition, ATL showed a greater response to strong than weak thematic associations, while pMTG showed the opposite pattern, supporting a key prediction of the Controlled Semantic Cognition account. ATL showed a stronger response for word pairs that were more semantically coherent, either because they shared physical features (in taxonomic trials) or a strong thematic association. These effects largely coincided in time and frequency (although an early oscillatory response in ATL was specific to taxonomic trials). In contrast, pMTG showed non-overlapping effects of semantic control demands and thematic judgements: this site showed a larger oscillatory response to weak associations, when ongoing retrieval needed to be shaped to suit the task demands, and also a larger response to thematic judgements contrasted with taxonomic trials (which was reduced but not eliminated when the thematic trials were easier). Consequently, time-sensitive neuroimaging supports a complex pattern of functional dissociations within the left temporal lobe, which reflects both coherence versus control and distinctive oscillatory responses for taxonomic overlap (in ATL) and thematic relations (in pMTG).
大脑如何表示和处理不同类型的知识?双枢纽假说认为,颞叶前部(ATL)支持基于共享物理特征(鼹鼠-猫)的分类关系,而颞顶叶区域,包括后颞中回(pMTG),支持主题关联(鼹鼠-地球)。相反,控制语义认知假说认为 ATL 支持知识的这两个方面,而左 pMTG 则有助于控制检索。本研究使用脑磁图来测试颞叶内功能分离的这些对比预测。ATL 和 pMTG 对分类和主题试验的反应分别更强,与双枢纽假说的预测一致,这些试验在行为表现上是匹配的。此外,ATL 对强主题关联的反应大于弱主题关联,而 pMTG 则表现出相反的模式,支持控制语义认知假说的一个关键预测。ATL 对语义连贯性更强的词对反应更强,无论是因为它们共享物理特征(在分类试验中)还是强烈的主题关联。这些效应在时间和频率上基本一致(尽管 ATL 中的早期振荡反应是特定于分类试验的)。相比之下,pMTG 显示出语义控制需求和主题判断的非重叠效应:该部位在需要根据任务需求调整进行中的检索时,对弱关联表现出更大的振荡反应,并且对主题判断的反应也大于分类试验(当主题试验更容易时,这种反应会减少但不会消除)。因此,时间敏感的神经影像学支持左颞叶内复杂的功能分离模式,这反映了连贯性与控制之间的复杂关系,以及分类重叠(在 ATL 中)和主题关系(在 pMTG 中)的独特振荡反应。