Jackson Johanna, Jambrina Enrique, Li Jennifer, Marston Hugh, Menzies Fiona, Phillips Keith, Gilmour Gary
Lilly Research Centre, Eli Lilly and Company, Windlesham, United Kingdom.
Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Alcobendas, Spain.
Front Neurosci. 2019 Jul 23;13:735. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00735. eCollection 2019.
Dynamic gain and loss of synapses is fundamental to healthy brain function. While Alzheimer's Disease (AD) treatment strategies have largely focussed on beta-amyloid and tau protein pathologies, the synapse itself may also be a critical endpoint to consider regarding disease modification. Disruption of mechanisms of neuronal plasticity, eventually resulting in a net loss of synapses, is implicated as an early pathological event in AD. Synaptic dysfunction therefore may be a final common biological mechanism linking protein pathologies to disease symptoms. This review summarizes evidence supporting the idea of early neuroplastic deficits being prevalent in AD. Changes in synaptic density can occur before overt neurodegeneration and should not be considered to uniformly decrease over the course of the disease. Instead, synaptic levels are influenced by an interplay between processes of degeneration and atrophy, and those of maintenance and compensation at regional and network levels. How these neuroplastic changes are driven by amyloid and tau pathology are varied. A mixture of direct effects of amyloid and tau on synaptic integrity, as well as indirect effects on processes such as inflammation and neuronal energetics are likely to be at play here. Focussing on the synapse and mechanisms of neuroplasticity as therapeutic opportunities in AD raises some important conceptual and strategic issues regarding translational research, and how preclinical research can inform clinical studies. Nevertheless, substrates of neuroplasticity represent an emerging complementary class of drug target that would aim to normalize synapse dynamics and restore cognitive function in the AD brain and in other neurodegenerative diseases.
突触的动态增减对健康的脑功能至关重要。虽然阿尔茨海默病(AD)的治疗策略主要集中在β-淀粉样蛋白和tau蛋白病变上,但突触本身也可能是疾病修饰方面需要考虑的关键终点。神经元可塑性机制的破坏最终导致突触净损失,这被认为是AD的早期病理事件。因此,突触功能障碍可能是将蛋白质病变与疾病症状联系起来的最终共同生物学机制。本综述总结了支持AD中普遍存在早期神经可塑性缺陷这一观点的证据。突触密度的变化可在明显的神经退行性变之前发生,且不应被认为在疾病过程中会一致地降低。相反,突触水平受区域和网络层面的退化与萎缩过程以及维持与补偿过程之间相互作用的影响。淀粉样蛋白和tau病理如何驱动这些神经可塑性变化是多样的。淀粉样蛋白和tau对突触完整性的直接影响,以及对炎症和神经元能量代谢等过程的间接影响可能都在起作用。将突触和神经可塑性机制作为AD的治疗靶点会引发一些关于转化研究以及临床前研究如何为临床研究提供信息的重要概念和战略问题。然而,神经可塑性底物代表了一类新兴的互补性药物靶点,其旨在使AD大脑及其他神经退行性疾病中的突触动态正常化并恢复认知功能。