Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Québec City, QC, Canada.
Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Nov;33(11):1775-1787. doi: 10.1177/0269215519867998. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
This systematic review documents the content and the quality of the psychometric evidence concerning the utilization of the Community Integration Questionnaire for individuals living with a disability other than a traumatic brain injury.
Medline, Embase, CINAHL, OTseeker and PsycINFO (searched from inception to June 2019).
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used for conducting and reporting this review. Studies that investigated at least one psychometric property of the Community Integration Questionnaire for individuals living with a disability other than traumatic brain injury were included. Data extraction and critical methodological appraisal of the articles (MacDermid checklist, COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist) were independently performed and validated by the first two authors.
Ten studies representing 3000 individuals met the inclusion criteria. Five populations were documented. There are positive and trustable data regarding internal consistency for adults living with multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury or burns and in mixed samples ( = 0.71-0.84). Construct validity is fairly documented for adults living with multiple sclerosis or aphasia and in mixed samples. Test-retest reliably is acceptable for adults living with multiple sclerosis (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.91-0.97) as well as responsiveness (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.81). Other psychometric properties could not be demonstrated sufficiently solid.
Many psychometric properties of the Community Integration Questionnaire are still poorly evaluated for adults living with a disability other than a traumatic brain injury. However, promising data have been documented in each population included in this review.
本系统评价记录了除创伤性脑损伤以外的残疾个体使用社区融合问卷的心理测量证据的内容和质量。
Medline、Embase、CINAHL、OTseeker 和 PsycINFO（从创建到 2019 年 6 月进行检索）。
使用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目来进行和报告本综述。纳入了至少调查了除创伤性脑损伤以外的残疾个体使用社区融合问卷的一个心理测量特性的研究。第一和第二作者独立进行并验证了数据提取和文章的关键方法学评估（MacDermid 清单、共识标准选择健康测量工具清单）。
符合纳入标准的研究有 10 项，代表 3000 人。记录了 5 个人群。有关于多发性硬化症、脊髓损伤或烧伤以及混合样本中成年人的内部一致性的积极和可靠数据（ = 0.71-0.84）。在混合样本中，构建效度在多发性硬化症或失语症的成年人中得到了充分的证明。多发性硬化症成年人的重测信度可接受（组内相关系数 = 0.91-0.97），以及反应性（受试者工作特征曲线下面积 = 0.81）。其他心理测量特性无法得到充分证明。
对于除创伤性脑损伤以外的残疾成年人，社区融合问卷的许多心理测量特性仍然评价不佳。然而，本综述中纳入的每个人群都记录了有希望的数据。
