Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London (UCL) Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Sep;18(9):834-844. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30200-5.
Inclusion body myositis is an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy and the most common myopathy affecting people older than 50 years. To date, there are no effective drug treatments. We aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of bimagrumab-a fully human monoclonal antibody-in individuals with inclusion body myositis.
We did a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (RESILIENT) at 38 academic clinical sites in Australia, Europe, Japan, and the USA. Individuals (aged 36-85 years) were eligible for the study if they met modified 2010 Medical Research Council criteria for inclusion body myositis. We randomly assigned participants (1:1:1:1) using a blocked randomisation schedule (block size of four) to either bimagrumab (10 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, or 1 mg/kg) or placebo matched in appearance to bimagrumab, administered as intravenous infusions every 4 weeks for at least 48 weeks. All study participants, the funder, investigators, site personnel, and people doing assessments were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome measure was 6-min walking distance (6MWD), which was assessed at week 52 in the primary analysis population and analysed by intention-to-treat principles. We used a multivariate normal repeated measures model to analyse data for 6MWD. Safety was assessed by recording adverse events and by electrocardiography, echocardiography, haematological testing, urinalysis, and blood chemistry. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01925209; this report represents the final analysis.
Between Sept 26, 2013, and Jan 6, 2016, 251 participants were enrolled to the study, of whom 63 were assigned to each bimagrumab group and 62 were allocated to the placebo group. At week 52, 6MWD change from baseline did not differ between any bimagrumab dose and placebo (least squares mean treatment difference for bimagrumab 10 mg/kg group, 17·6 m, SE 14·3, 99% CI -19·6 to 54·8; p=0·22; for 3 mg/kg group, 18·6 m, 14·2, -18·2 to 55·4; p=0·19; and for 1 mg/kg group, -1·3 m, 14·1, -38·0 to 35·4; p=0·93). 63 (100%) participants in each bimagrumab group and 61 (98%) of 62 in the placebo group had at least one adverse event. Falls were the most frequent adverse event (48 [76%] in the bimagrumab 10 mg/kg group, 55 [87%] in the 3 mg/kg group, 54 [86%] in the 1 mg/kg group, and 52 [84%] in the placebo group). The most frequently reported adverse events with bimagrumab were muscle spasms (32 [51%] in the bimagrumab 10 mg/kg group, 43 [68%] in the 3 mg/kg group, 25 [40%] in the 1 mg/kg group, and 13 [21%] in the placebo group) and diarrhoea (33 [52%], 28 [44%], 20 [32%], and 11 [18%], respectively). Adverse events leading to discontinuation were reported in four (6%) participants in each bimagrumab group compared with one (2%) participant in the placebo group. At least one serious adverse event was reported by 21 (33%) participants in the 10 mg/kg group, 11 (17%) in the 3 mg/kg group, 20 (32%) in the 1 mg/kg group, and 20 (32%) in the placebo group. No significant adverse cardiac effects were recorded on electrocardiography or echocardiography. Two deaths were reported during the study, one attributable to subendocardial myocardial infarction (secondary to gastrointestinal bleeding after an intentional overdose of concomitant sedatives and antidepressants) and one attributable to lung adenocarcinoma. Neither death was considered by the investigator to be related to bimagrumab.
Bimagrumab showed a good safety profile, relative to placebo, in individuals with inclusion body myositis but did not improve 6MWD. The strengths of our study are that, to the best of our knowledge, it is the largest randomised controlled trial done in people with inclusion body myositis, and it provides important natural history data over 12 months.
Novartis Pharma.
包涵体肌炎是一种特发性炎症性肌病,也是最常见的影响 50 岁以上人群的肌病。迄今为止,尚无有效的药物治疗方法。我们旨在评估双免疫球蛋白单克隆抗体(bimagrumab)在包涵体肌炎患者中的安全性、疗效和耐受性。
我们在澳大利亚、欧洲、日本和美国的 38 个学术临床中心进行了一项多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照研究(RESILIENT)。如果符合改良 2010 年肌炎研究委员会包涵体肌炎的标准,年龄在 36-85 岁之间的个体有资格参加该研究。我们采用随机分组(分组大小为 4),将参与者(1:1:1:1)随机分配至 bimagrumab(10 mg/kg、3 mg/kg 或 1 mg/kg)或与 bimagrumab 外观匹配的安慰剂,每 4 周静脉输注一次,至少 48 周。所有研究参与者、资助者、研究者、现场工作人员和进行评估的人员都对治疗分配情况进行了盲法处理。主要结局测量指标为 6 分钟步行距离(6MWD),在主要分析人群中,于第 52 周进行评估,并按照意向治疗原则进行分析。我们使用多变量正态重复测量模型来分析 6MWD 数据。通过记录不良事件和心电图、超声心动图、血液学检查、尿液分析和血液化学检查来评估安全性。本试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT01925209;本报告代表最终分析。
2013 年 9 月 26 日至 2016 年 1 月 6 日期间,共招募了 251 名参与者参加研究,其中每组 63 名参与者接受 bimagrumab 治疗,62 名参与者接受安慰剂治疗。在第 52 周时,bimagrumab 各剂量组与安慰剂组之间的 6MWD 从基线的变化无差异(bimagrumab 10 mg/kg 组的最小二乘均数治疗差异为 17.6 m,标准误 14.3,99%置信区间为-19.6 至 54.8;p=0.22;bimagrumab 3 mg/kg 组为 18.6 m,14.2,-18.2 至 55.4;p=0.19;bimagrumab 1 mg/kg 组为-1.3 m,14.1,-38.0 至 35.4;p=0.93)。bimagrumab 各剂量组和安慰剂组中均有 63 名(100%)和 61 名(98%)参与者至少发生了一次不良事件。跌倒最常见的不良事件(bimagrumab 10 mg/kg 组 48 例[76%],bimagrumab 3 mg/kg 组 55 例[87%],bimagrumab 1 mg/kg 组 54 例[86%],安慰剂组 52 例[84%])。bimagrumab 最常报告的不良事件为肌肉痉挛(bimagrumab 10 mg/kg 组 32 例[51%],bimagrumab 3 mg/kg 组 43 例[68%],bimagrumab 1 mg/kg 组 25 例[40%],安慰剂组 13 例[21%])和腹泻(bimagrumab 10 mg/kg 组 33 例[52%],bimagrumab 3 mg/kg 组 28 例[44%],bimagrumab 1 mg/kg 组 20 例[32%],安慰剂组 11 例[18%])。与安慰剂组(1 例[2%])相比,bimagrumab 各剂量组(6 例[6%])中有 4 例(6%)参与者因不良事件而停止治疗。在 10 mg/kg 组、3 mg/kg 组、1 mg/kg 组和安慰剂组中,分别有 21 名(33%)、11 名(17%)、20 名(32%)和 20 名(32%)参与者报告了至少一次严重不良事件。心电图或超声心动图未记录到任何显著的心脏不良事件。在研究期间,有 2 例死亡报告,1 例归因于心内膜下心肌梗死(继发于同时服用镇静剂和抗抑郁药后的胃肠道出血),另 1 例归因于肺腺癌。这两起死亡事件均被研究者认为与 bimagrumab 无关。
与安慰剂相比,bimagrumab 具有良好的安全性,在包涵体肌炎患者中,但并未改善 6MWD。我们研究的优势在于,据我们所知,这是在包涵体肌炎患者中进行的最大规模的随机对照试验,并提供了超过 12 个月的重要自然病史数据。
诺华制药。