• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用三方动态博弈模型,从政府异质性视角研究中国雾霾污染的区域协同治理。

Using three-sided dynamic game model to study regional cooperative governance of haze pollution in China from a government heterogeneity perspective.

机构信息

School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.

School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China; School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100875, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2019 Dec 1;694:133559. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.365. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.365
PMID:31398649
Abstract

This paper constructs a three-sided dynamic game model of the regional cooperative governance of haze pollution in China from a government heterogeneity perspective. By analysing the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium from game theory, this study explores the feasible mechanisms and the necessary conditions to establish a cooperative model, as well as effective ways for Superior Government to improve administrative efficiency. As evidenced in the results, due to the heterogeneity of governments and "free-riding" behaviours, a stable cooperative model cannot be spontaneously generated between two heterogeneous local governments, so the Superior Government is compelled to supervise the two parties and punish the non-cooperative ones. At the same time, the Superior Government can improve the efficiency of the supervision mechanism by increasing the penalty for non-cooperative parties and reducing the conflict cost when local governments are non-cooperative. The biggest innovation of this paper is to describe efficiency from the perspective of probability. The probability is calculated by the ratio of input to output. If the output-stable cooperation between local governments-is constant, then the less input-the cost of supervision, the higher the efficiency of the mechanism.

摘要

本文从政府异质性的角度构建了中国雾霾污染区域协同治理的三方动态博弈模型。通过博弈论的混合策略纳什均衡分析,探讨了建立合作模型的可行机制和必要条件,以及上级政府提高行政效率的有效途径。研究结果表明,由于政府之间的异质性和“搭便车”行为,两个异质的地方政府之间不能自发产生稳定的合作模型,因此上级政府必须对双方进行监督,并对不合作的一方进行惩罚。同时,上级政府可以通过增加对不合作方的惩罚和减少地方政府不合作时的冲突成本,提高监督机制的效率。本文的最大创新之处在于从概率的角度来描述效率。概率是通过投入与产出的比率来计算的。如果地方政府之间的输出——稳定合作——是恒定的,那么投入越少——监督成本越低,机制的效率就越高。

相似文献

1
Using three-sided dynamic game model to study regional cooperative governance of haze pollution in China from a government heterogeneity perspective.运用三方动态博弈模型,从政府异质性视角研究中国雾霾污染的区域协同治理。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Dec 1;694:133559. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.365. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
2
Study on the heterogeneous government synergistic governance game of haze in China.中国雾霾的异质政府协同治理博弈研究。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Oct 15;248:109318. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109318. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
3
Using cooperative game model of air pollution governance to study the cost sharing in Yangtze River Delta region.运用大气污染治理合作博弈模型研究长三角地区成本分担。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 1;301:113896. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113896. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
4
Evolutionary game analysis on industrial pollution control of local government in China.中国地方政府工业污染控制的演化博弈分析。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Nov 15;298:113499. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113499. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
5
An Evolutionary Game Model for the Multi-agent Co-Governance of Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution Control under Intensive Management Pattern in China.中国集约化管理模式下农业面源污染控制的多主体共同治理的演化博弈模型
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 4;17(7):2472. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072472.
6
Factors Influencing Intergovernmental Cooperation on Emission Reduction in Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration: An Evolutionary Game Theory Perspective.影响成渝城市群减排的政府间合作因素:基于演化博弈论的视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 11;19(22):14848. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214848.
7
Transboundary watershed pollution control analysis for pollution abatement and ecological compensation.跨界流域水污染控制分析用于污染减排和生态补偿。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(15):44025-44042. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25177-4. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
8
Evolutionary game of inland shipping pollution control under government co-supervision.政府共同监管下的内河航运污染控制演化博弈
Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 Oct;171:112730. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112730. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
9
The Relationship among Government, Enterprise, and Public in Environmental Governance from the Perspective of Multi-Player Evolutionary Game.从多方进化博弈的角度看环境治理中的政府、企业与公众关系
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 11;16(18):3351. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183351.
10
The Impact of Haze Pollution on Regional Eco-Economic Treatment Efficiency in China: An Environmental Regulation Perspective.雾霾污染对中国区域生态经济处理效率的影响:环境规制视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 23;16(21):4059. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214059.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolution analysis of low-carbon cooperation of service providers based on Moran process in cloud manufacturing.基于 Moran 过程的云制造服务提供商低碳合作演化分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 21;19(3):e0299952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299952. eCollection 2024.
2
China's Jinshan Yinshan sustainability evolutionary game equilibrium research under government and enterprises resource constraint dilemma.中国的金山银山可持续发展演化博弈均衡研究——在政府和企业资源约束困境下。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(27):41012-41036. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18786-y. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
3
Impact of rating and praise campaigns on local government environmental governance efficiency: Evidence from the campaign of establishment of national sanitary cities in China.
评价和表扬活动对地方政府环境治理效率的影响:来自中国创建国家卫生城市活动的证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 24;16(6):e0253703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253703. eCollection 2021.
4
Public Voice via Social Media: Role in Cooperative Governance during Public Health Emergency.公众通过社交媒体发声:公共卫生突发事件下合作治理中的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 18;17(18):6840. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186840.