Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚东南部山桉人工林疏伐和烧除燃料削减处理对森林碳和丛林火燃料危害的影响。

Effect of thinning and burning fuel reduction treatments on forest carbon and bushfire fuel hazard in Eucalyptus sieberi forests of South-Eastern Australia.

机构信息

School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Creswick, Victoria 3363, Australia.

School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Creswick, Victoria 3363, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2019 Dec 1;694:133708. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133708. Epub 2019 Aug 1.

Abstract

More frequent hot and windy weather in fire prone forested landscapes requires that a full suite of fuel reduction measures be investigated for effectiveness in fuel hazard reduction, environmental impact and carbon (C) outcomes. Although prescribed fire and thinning are routinely applied in forests of North America to reduce fuel loads, there are few detailed studies from Australia. We report the impacts of fuel reduction treatments including burning, mechanical thinning and the combination of both on forest C and fuel hazard in open forests dominated by Eucalyptus sieberi in south-eastern Australia. Carbon losses to the atmosphere and redistribution within the forest were calculated from stocks within each fuel category before and after treatment. Mechanical thinning + burning was the most effective treatment for reducing aboveground C and fuel hazard, with major reductions in dead trees, stumps and understorey, as well as stems removed for sale as pulpwood. However forest floor fuel loads increased in thinned treatments relative to control forests. The overall fuel hazard rating in the burn only treatment was significantly reduced from extreme to low immediately following burning. In thinned only stands, the overall fuel hazard rating did not change from the pre-treatment rating of extreme, due to high surface and forest floor fuel loads and loose and flammable bark on the retained overstorey trees. This result suggests the current fuel hazard guide in use in Australia should be revised to enable it to better describe the benefits of thinning for fuel reduction - in this case the removal of about 50% of aboveground C mostly as overstorey trees, and a significant reduction in understorey, dead trees and stumps.

摘要

在易发生火灾的森林景观中,炎热多风的天气更加频繁,这就要求全面调查一系列减少燃料的措施,以评估其在减少燃料危险、环境影响和碳(C)方面的效果。虽然在北美的森林中常规采用了控制性火烧和疏伐措施来减少燃料负荷,但澳大利亚的相关详细研究较少。我们报告了减少燃料处理的影响,包括火烧、机械疏伐以及两者的结合,这些处理对澳大利亚东南部以桉树为主的开阔森林的森林 C 和燃料危险的影响。从每个燃料类别在处理前后的存量中计算了向大气释放碳的损失以及在森林内的重新分布。机械疏伐+火烧是减少地上 C 和燃料危险最有效的处理方法,大量减少了枯树、树桩和林下植被,以及被砍伐作为纸浆木材出售的茎干。然而,与对照林相比,疏伐林的林下燃料负荷增加了。仅火烧处理的整体燃料危险等级从极端立即显著降低到低。在仅疏伐的林分中,由于林下和地表燃料负荷高,以及保留的上层树木的树皮疏松易燃,整体燃料危险等级没有从处理前的极端等级发生变化。这一结果表明,澳大利亚目前使用的燃料危险指南应进行修订,以更好地描述疏伐在减少燃料方面的好处——在这种情况下,大约 50%的地上 C 主要作为上层树木被去除,林下植被、枯树和树桩的数量也显著减少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验