Department of Didactics of the Musical, Plastic and Corporal Expression, Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 22001 Huesca, Spain.
Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 8;16(16):2839. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162839.
Grounded in self-determination theory (SDT), prior research has demonstrated that physical education (PE) teachers may have different reasons to engage in teaching. Although some person-centered studies have identified varied motivational profiles in PE teachers, none of these studies have included the three forms of motivation (i.e., autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, and amotivation). This study aims to identify teachers' motivational profiles, using the three forms of motivation. Moreover, differences between the obtained profiles in terms of job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion were examined. A sample of 107 primary school PE teachers participated. Four distinct motivational profiles were identified: "relatively amotivated," "somewhat motivated," "autonomous-controlled motivated," and "relatively autonomously motivated." Results showed that the predominantly autonomously motivated PE teachers reported the most adaptive pattern of outcomes. Although PE teachers from the "relatively autonomously motivated" group did not differ in terms of job satisfaction when compared to those in the "autonomous-controlled motivated" group, the former displayed lower values of emotional exhaustion. These findings support SDT in that more motivation is not necessarily better if this additional motivation comes from controlled reasons. These results could raise awareness among school stakeholders about the importance of increasing PE teachers' autonomous motivation.
扎根于自我决定理论(SDT),先前的研究表明,体育教师可能有不同的教学动机。虽然一些以人为中心的研究已经确定了体育教师的不同动机特征,但这些研究都没有包含三种动机形式(即自主动机、控制动机和无动机)。本研究旨在利用三种动机形式来确定教师的动机特征。此外,还研究了不同动机特征在工作满意度和情绪耗竭方面的差异。研究对象为 107 名小学体育教师。确定了四种不同的动机特征:“相对无动机”、“有些动机”、“自主-控制动机”和“相对自主动机”。研究结果表明,主要是自主动机的体育教师报告了适应性最强的结果模式。尽管与“自主-控制动机”组相比,“相对自主动机”组的体育教师在工作满意度方面没有差异,但前者的情绪耗竭程度较低。这些发现支持了自我决定理论,即如果这种额外的动机来自于控制原因,那么更多的动机不一定更好。这些结果可以引起学校利益相关者对提高体育教师自主动机重要性的关注。