Optentia Research Unit, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa.
Department of Work and Organization Studies, Faculty of Economics and Business, KU Leuven, Brussels, Belgium.
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 29;10:870073. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.870073. eCollection 2022.
In general, being unemployed has negative implications for the individual and the mental health of the public as a collective. One way to escape this situation is to search for a job. However, following self-determination theory (SDT), unemployed people's different reasons (i.e., their motivation) for engaging in a job search influence their well-being, attitudes, and behaviors for better or worse. Some research has already supported the associations between different types of motivation and these outcomes, but less is known about how these types of motivation simultaneously associate with these outcomes. The current study addressed this issue by studying how different motivational profiles had different implications for the affective experiences, commitment to employment, and job search behavior of the unemployed. Latent profile analysis, among 865 unemployed individuals from previously disadvantaged communities in South Africa, highlighted four distinct motivational profiles: motivated, ambivalent, amotivated, and unmotivated. The motivated reported some good well-being (i.e., positive experiences) and economic outcomes (i.e., employment commitment and job search), but these came at a cost (i.e., more negative experiences). The same went for the ambivalent, but to a lesser extent. Being unmotivated seemed to have the opposite effect in that it came with psychological benefits, but with economic costs, as these individuals might withdraw from the labor market. This also applied to the amotivated, although they experienced less psychological benefit than their unmotivated counterparts. The findings made several contributions to SDT and unemployment research and could help tailor interventions and policies for particular types of unemployed people.
一般来说,失业对个人和公众的心理健康都有负面影响。摆脱这种情况的一种方法是找工作。然而,根据自我决定理论(SDT),失业者寻找工作的不同原因(即他们的动机)会对他们的幸福感、态度和行为产生好坏不同的影响。一些研究已经支持了不同类型的动机与这些结果之间的关联,但对于这些类型的动机如何同时与这些结果相关联,了解得较少。本研究通过研究不同的动机特征如何对失业者的情感体验、就业承诺和求职行为产生不同的影响来解决这个问题。在南非以前处于不利地位的社区的 865 名失业者中进行的潜在特征分析,突出了四种不同的动机特征:有动机的、矛盾的、无动机的和无动力的。有动机的人报告了一些良好的幸福感(即积极的体验)和经济结果(即就业承诺和求职),但这是有代价的(即更多的负面体验)。矛盾的情况也是如此,但程度较轻。无动机似乎有相反的效果,因为它带来了心理上的好处,但也有经济上的代价,因为这些人可能会退出劳动力市场。这同样适用于无动机的人,尽管他们的心理收益比无动力的人少。这些发现为 SDT 和失业研究做出了一些贡献,并可以帮助针对特定类型的失业者量身定制干预措施和政策。