• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与鞭打伤相关的测量仪器的性能特征:系统综述方案。

Performance properties of health-related measurement instruments in whiplash: systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1450 San Pablo St, HC4 - #5400A, Mail Code: 9224, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 9;8(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1119-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-019-1119-0
PMID:31399055
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6688369/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whiplash is a common traumatic cervical injury which is most often a consequence of rear-end motor vehicle accidents. It has been estimated that up to 50% of the whiplash patients suffer from chronic symptoms, resulting in extensive individual and societal burden. Several measurement instruments are used for initial assessment of whiplash and evaluation of response to treatment. However, a comprehensive assessment of the performance of these measures is lacking. Furthermore, there is no consensus on the most relevant outcome domains and their corresponding measurement instruments of choice. This systematic review aims to identify, describe, and critically appraise the performance properties of health-related measurement instruments in whiplash population.

METHODS

The following literature databases will be searched from their date of establishment: PubMed, Embase®, MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, PsycINFO, and HAPI. All original articles evaluating the reliability, validity, responsiveness, and feasibility of health-related measurement instruments in whiplash will be included, without additional restriction on their intended use, source of data, and structure. Risk of bias will be assessed using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. Findings of the studies will be judged against the criteria for good measurement properties, and results from all studies will be qualitatively summarized to generate an overall quality of findings. Overall quality of evidence will be determined using a modified GRADE approach, which will be used in conjunction with the overall quality of results for generation of recommendations. Two reviewers will perform all steps of the review independently. Discrepancies will be discussed between the reviewers, and in case of remaining disagreement, the senior reviewer will make the final decision.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review will summarize the body of literature on health-related measurement instruments in whiplash, aiming to facilitate the selection of high-quality measurement instrument for researchers and physicians. Findings of this study will guide the ongoing efforts for development of a core outcome set.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO reference number CRD42018070901.

摘要

背景

挥鞭伤是一种常见的创伤性颈椎损伤,通常是汽车追尾事故的后果。据估计,多达 50%的挥鞭伤患者患有慢性症状,给个人和社会带来了巨大的负担。有几种测量工具用于初步评估挥鞭伤和评估治疗反应。然而,这些措施的性能综合评估却缺乏。此外,对于最相关的结果领域及其相应的首选测量工具,尚无共识。本系统评价旨在确定、描述和批判性地评估与健康相关的测量工具在挥鞭伤人群中的性能。

方法

将从建立日期起搜索以下文献数据库:PubMed、Embase®、MEDLINE、CINAHL Complete、PsycINFO 和 HAPI。所有评估健康相关测量工具可靠性、有效性、反应性和可行性的原始文章,无论其预期用途、数据来源和结构如何,都将被包括在内。将使用 COSMIN 偏倚风险检查表评估偏倚风险。研究结果将根据良好测量特性的标准进行判断,所有研究的结果将进行定性总结,以产生总体发现质量。使用改良的 GRADE 方法确定证据的总体质量,该方法将与结果的总体质量结合使用,以生成建议。两名审查员将独立执行审查的所有步骤。审查员之间的差异将进行讨论,如果仍然存在分歧,资深审查员将做出最终决定。

讨论

本系统评价将总结挥鞭伤相关健康测量工具的文献,旨在为研究人员和医生选择高质量的测量工具提供便利。该研究的结果将指导正在进行的核心结局集开发工作。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO 参考编号 CRD42018070901。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a77/6688369/4ca447d51cad/13643_2019_1119_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a77/6688369/4ca447d51cad/13643_2019_1119_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a77/6688369/4ca447d51cad/13643_2019_1119_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance properties of health-related measurement instruments in whiplash: systematic review protocol.与鞭打伤相关的测量仪器的性能特征:系统综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 9;8(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1119-0.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Measurement properties of quality of life measurement instruments for infants, children and adolescents with eczema: protocol for a systematic review.湿疹婴幼儿及青少年生活质量测量工具的测量属性:系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 9;5:25. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0202-z.
4
PROTOCOL: Psychometric properties of instruments for measuring elder abuse and neglect in community and institutional settings: A systematic review.方案:社区和机构环境中测量虐待和忽视老年人工具的心理测量特性:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 27;19(3):e1342. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1342. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Measurement properties of adult quality-of-life measurement instruments for eczema: protocol for a systematic review.成人湿疹生活质量测量工具的测量属性:一项系统评价的方案
Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 16;4:48. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0041-3.
6
Outcomes evaluating quality of life and their measurement properties in early-onset scoliosis: protocol for a systematic review.评价早发性脊柱侧凸生活质量及其测量特性的结局指标:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 6;11(9):e048956. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048956.
7
The application of health literacy measurement tools (collective or individual domains) in assessing chronic disease management: a systematic review protocol.健康素养测量工具(集体或个体领域)在慢性病管理评估中的应用:一项系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 7;5:97. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0267-8.
8
Measurement properties of self-report pedestrians' road crossing behavior questionnaires constructed based on the theory of planned behavior: protocol for a systematic review.基于计划行为理论构建的自我报告行人心目中的道路穿越行为问卷的测量特性:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 3;8(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1121-6.
9
The measurement properties of assessment tools for chronic wounds: A systematic review.评估慢性伤口的工具的测量特性:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Sep;121:103998. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103998. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
10
Implementation outcome assessment instruments used in physical healthcare settings and their measurement properties: a systematic review protocol.用于物理医疗保健环境的实施结果评估工具及其测量特性:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 8;7(10):e017972. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017972.

引用本文的文献

1
Global trends and hotspots related to whiplash injury: A visualization study.全球与挥鞭样损伤相关的趋势和热点:一项可视化研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jul 19;103(29):e38777. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038777.
2
The Definition, Assessment, and Prevalence of (Human Assumed) Central Sensitisation in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.慢性下腰痛患者中(人为假定的)中枢敏化的定义、评估及患病率:一项系统综述
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 17;10(24):5931. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245931.
3
Reliability Statistics: A "Weight-Bearing" View.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability and Validity of the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System: A Systematic Review.AOSpine胸腰椎损伤分类系统的可靠性与有效性:一项系统评价
Global Spine J. 2019 Apr;9(2):231-242. doi: 10.1177/2192568218806847. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
2
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价指南。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1147-1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
3
COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.
可靠性统计:一种“负重”视角。
Global Spine J. 2020 Oct;10(7):943-950. doi: 10.1177/2192568220935826.
4
Patient Reported Outcome Measures of Sleep Quality in Fibromyalgia: A COSMIN Systematic Review.纤维肌痛患者睡眠质量的患者报告结局测量指标:COSMIN 系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 26;17(9):2992. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17092992.
5
A Systematic Review Evaluating Psychometric Properties of Parent or Caregiver Report Instruments on Child Maltreatment: Part 2: Internal Consistency, Reliability, Measurement Error, Structural Validity, Hypothesis Testing, Cross-Cultural Validity, and Criterion Validity.系统评价评估儿童虐待的父母或照顾者报告工具的心理测量特性:第 2 部分:内部一致性、可靠性、测量误差、结构效度、假设检验、跨文化效度和效标效度。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2021 Dec;22(5):1296-1315. doi: 10.1177/1524838020915591. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价偏倚风险清单。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1171-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
4
Feasibility and Data Quality of the National Spinal Cord Injury Registry of Iran (NSCIR-IR): A Pilot Study.伊朗国家脊髓损伤登记处(NSCIR-IR)的可行性与数据质量:一项试点研究
Arch Iran Med. 2017 Aug;20(8):494-502.
5
The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.《COMET手册:第1.0版》
Trials. 2017 Jun 20;18(Suppl 3):280. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4.
6
The Treatment of Neck Pain-Associated Disorders and Whiplash-Associated Disorders: A Clinical Practice Guideline.颈部疼痛相关疾病和挥鞭样损伤相关疾病的治疗:临床实践指南。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 Oct;39(8):523-564.e27. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.08.007.
7
How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a "Core Outcome Set" - a practical guideline.如何为“核心结局集”中包含的结局选择结局测量工具——实用指南
Trials. 2016 Sep 13;17(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1555-2.
8
Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information.国际功能、残疾和健康分类链接规则的细化,以加强其建立健康信息可比性的潜力。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Mar;41(5):574-583. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1145258. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
9
The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument.基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)以及如何选择结果测量仪器。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2016 Jan 19;20(2):105-13. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143.
10
The quality of systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments.与健康相关的结局测量工具的系统评价质量
Qual Life Res. 2016 Apr;25(4):767-79. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1122-4. Epub 2015 Sep 7.